Literature DB >> 16019928

Mobile phones, mobile phone base stations and cancer: a review.

J E Moulder1, K R Foster, L S Erdreich, J P McNamee.   

Abstract

There have been reports in the media and claims in the courts that radiofrequency (RF) emissions from mobile phones are a cause of cancer, and there have been numerous public objections to the siting of mobile phone base antennas because of a fear of cancer. This review summarizes the current state of evidence concerning whether the RF energy used for wireless communication might be carcinogenic. Relevant studies were identified by searching MedLine with a combination of exposure and endpoint terms. This was supplemented by a review of the over 1700 citations assembled by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE) International Committee on Electromagnetic Safety as part of their updating of the IEEE C95.1 RF energy safety guidelines. Where there were multiple studies, preference was given to recent reports, to positive reports of effects and to attempts to confirm such positive reports. Biophysical considerations indicate that there is little theoretical basis for anticipating that RF energy would have significant biological effects at the power levels used by modern mobile phones and their base station antennas. The epidemiological evidence for a causal association between cancer and RF energy is weak and limited. Animal studies have provided no consistent evidence that exposure to RF energy at non-thermal intensities causes or promotes cancer. Extensive in vitro studies have found no consistent evidence of genotoxic potential, but in vitro studies assessing the epigenetic potential of RF energy are limited. Overall, a weight-of-evidence evaluation shows that the current evidence for a causal association between cancer and exposure to RF energy is weak and unconvincing. However, the existing epidemiology is limited and the possibility of epigenetic effects has not been thoroughly evaluated, so that additional research in those areas will be required for a more thorough assessment of the possibility of a causal connection between cancer and the RF energy from mobile telecommunications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16019928     DOI: 10.1080/09553000500091097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol        ISSN: 0955-3002            Impact factor:   2.694


  22 in total

Review 1.  Brain tumor epidemiology: consensus from the Brain Tumor Epidemiology Consortium.

Authors:  Melissa L Bondy; Michael E Scheurer; Beatrice Malmer; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Faith G Davis; Dora Il'yasova; Carol Kruchko; Bridget J McCarthy; Preetha Rajaraman; Judith A Schwartzbaum; Siegal Sadetzki; Brigitte Schlehofer; Tarik Tihan; Joseph L Wiemels; Margaret Wrensch; Patricia A Buffler
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  Mobile phone radiofrequency exposure has no effect on DNA double strand breaks (DSB) in human lymphocytes.

Authors:  Elisa Danese; Giuseppe Lippi; Ruggero Buonocore; Marco Benati; Chiara Bovo; Chiara Bonaguri; Gian Luca Salvagno; Giorgio Brocco; Dirk Roggenbuck; Martina Montagnana
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-07

3.  The genotoxic effect of radiofrequency waves on mouse brain.

Authors:  Emin Karaca; Burak Durmaz; Huseyin Aktug; Huseyin Altug; Teoman Yildiz; Candan Guducu; Melis Irgi; Mehtap Gulcihan Cinar Koksal; Ferda Ozkinay; Cumhur Gunduz; Ozgur Cogulu
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 4.130

4.  Does chronic exposure to mobile phones affect cognition?

Authors:  Mamta Mohan; Farah Khaliq; Aprajita Panwar; Neelam Vaney
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

5.  The association between problematic cellular phone use and risky behaviors and low self-esteem among Taiwanese adolescents.

Authors:  Yuan-Sheng Yang; Ju-Yu Yen; Chih-Hung Ko; Chung-Ping Cheng; Cheng-Fang Yen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Environmental causes of childhood brain tumours.

Authors:  Olufemi E Idowu; Mopelola A Idowu
Journal:  Afr Health Sci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 0.927

7.  Local exposure of 849 MHz and 1763 MHz radiofrequency radiation to mouse heads does not induce cell death or cell proliferation in brain.

Authors:  Tae-Hyung Kim; Tae-Hyoung Kim; Tai-Qin Huang; Ja-June Jang; Man Ho Kim; Hyun-Jeong Kim; Jae-Seon Lee; Jeong Ki Pack; Jeong-Sun Seo; Woong-Yang Park
Journal:  Exp Mol Med       Date:  2008-06-30       Impact factor: 8.718

8.  Is gene activity in plant cells affected by UMTS-irradiation? A whole genome approach.

Authors:  Julia C Engelmann; Rosalia Deeken; Tobias Müller; Günter Nimtz; M Rob G Roelfsema; Rainer Hedrich
Journal:  Adv Appl Bioinform Chem       Date:  2008-10-08

9.  Awareness of prostate cancer among patients and the general public: results of an international survey.

Authors:  J M Fitzpatrick; R S Kirby; C L Brough; A L Saggerson
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 5.554

10.  Mobile phone use and risk of uveal melanoma: results of the risk factors for uveal melanoma case-control study.

Authors:  Andreas Stang; Andrea Schmidt-Pokrzywniak; Timothy L Lash; Peter Karl Lommatzsch; Gerhard Taubert; Norbert Bornfeld; Karl-Heinz Jöckel
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-01-13       Impact factor: 13.506

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.