Literature DB >> 16019087

Noninvasive assessment of coronary stents in patients by 16-slice computed tomography.

Toshiro Kitagawa1, Takashi Fujii, Yasuyuki Tomohiro, Kouji Maeda, Masakazu Kobayashi, Eiji Kunita, Yoshitaka Sekiguchi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The usefulness of thin-slice multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) has been highly expected to assess the lumens of coronary artery stents. We evaluated the usefulness of 16-slice MDCT to assess the in-stent lumen after coronary artery stenting.
METHODS: In 42 consecutive patients after coronary artery stenting, retrospective ECG-gated CT-angiography using 16-slice MDCT (0.5-s rotation time, 16x0.625-mm detector collimation) was performed. The qualitative assessability of the lumens of 61 coronary stents (14 different types) by MDCT and the reasons for non-assessability were investigated. Furthermore, the evaluation of in-stent restenosis in 21 assessable stents of 16 patients, including quantitative density analysis by MDCT, was performed and the results were compared with those of conventional coronary angiography (CAG).
RESULTS: Of 61 stents, 42 (68.9%) were assessable. The assessability of diameter > or =3.5-mm stents made of stainless steel or cobalt was high (88.6%, 31/35), that of 3.0-mm stents was low (57.9%, 11/19) and all 2.5-mm stents were non-assessable due to partial volume effects and metal artifacts of stents. The lumens of stents made of tantalum were totally obscured and the metal artifacts of Bestent2 (gold markers) and S670 were severer than others. All non-assessable stents due to banding artifact and calcification were implanted in segment #1-3 and #6, respectively. In comparison to CAG, MDCT correctly detected the 5 in-stent restenoses and identified absence of restenoses was influenced strongly by the stent strut.
CONCLUSION: Despite some limitations, 16-slice MSCT is sufficiently useful for assessment of various coronary stents in patients and can detect in-stent restenoses of assessable stents with high accuracy in comparison to CAG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16019087     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.06.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cardiol        ISSN: 0167-5273            Impact factor:   4.164


  14 in total

1.  Comparative analysis between 64- and 320-slice spiral computed tomography in the display of coronary artery stents and diagnosis of in-stent restenosis.

Authors:  Junyan Yue; Jie Chen; Wenguang Dou; Ying Hu; Qiang Li; Fengmei Zhou; Hongkai Cui; Qingwu Wu; Ruimin Yang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Effect of contrast concentration, tube potential and reconstruction kernels on MDCT evaluation of coronary stents: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Gopi Kiran Reddy Sirineni; Mannudeep K Kalra; Krishna Pottala; Sandra Waldrop; Mushabbar Syed; Stefan Tigges
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2006-07-05       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  Comprehensive cardiac CT study: evaluation of coronary arteries, left ventricular function, and myocardial perfusion--is it possible?

Authors:  Ricardo C Cury; Koen Nieman; Michael D Shapiro; Khurram Nasir; Roberto C Cury; Thomas J Brady
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 5.952

4.  Use of high-resolution spiral CT for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Willem B Meijboom; Niels van Pelt; Pim de Feyter
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2007-02

5.  Coronary artery stent geometry and in-stent contrast attenuation with 64-slice computed tomography.

Authors:  Tiziano Schepis; Pascal Koepfli; Sebastian Leschka; Lotus Desbiolles; Lars Husmann; Oliver Gaemperli; Franz R Eberli; Simon Wildermuth; Borut Marincek; Thomas F Lüscher; Hatem Alkadhi; Philipp A Kaufmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  In vitro evaluation of coronary stents and in-stent stenosis using a dynamic cardiac phantom and a 64-detector row CT scanner.

Authors:  T Schlosser; T Scheuermann; S Ulzheimer; O K Mohrs; M Kühling; P E Albrecht; T Voigtländer; J Barkhausen; A Schmermund
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 5.460

7.  In-stent area stenosis on 64-slice multi-detector computed tomography coronary angiography: optimal cutoff value for minimum lumen cross-sectional area of coronary stents compared with intravascular ultrasound.

Authors:  Woocheol Kwon; Jiyoun Choi; Jang-Young Kim; Seong-Yoon Kim; Junghan Yoon; Kyoung-Hoon Choe; Seung Hwan Lee; Sung Gyun Ahn
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-05-06       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 8.  Transitioning from 16-slice to 64-slice multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery disease: are we really making progress?

Authors:  Razi Khan; Sapna Rawal; Mark J Eisenberg
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 5.223

9.  Comparison of 16-slice computed tomography with conventional angiography to evaluate coronary artery stent patency.

Authors:  Irmak Durur-Subasi; Mecit Kantarci; Afak Durur-Karakaya; Adnan Okur
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2009-04

10.  Diagnostic accuracy of in-stent coronary restenosis detection with multislice spiral computed tomography: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michèle Hamon; Laure Champ-Rigot; Rémy Morello; John W Riddell; Martial Hamon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.