BACKGROUND: Most clinical chemistry laboratories measure free thyroxine (FT4) by an analogue (direct) method. Nevertheless, the validity of analogue FT4 immunoassays has been questioned and patient's results using this approach frequently do not fit in with the clinical presentation. Because of these problems we routinely send out all direct free T4's that are < 2.5th percentile and many that are > 97.5th percentile for measurement by equilibrium dialysis, the gold standard method. In approximately half of these cases, the FT4 by equilibrium dialysis was normal. We developed a rapid, reliable free T4 method employing isotope dilution tandem mass spectrometry and compared our results with both the analogue (direct) free T4 and equilibrium dialysis procedures. METHODS: An API-4000 tandem mass spectrometer (Sciex, Toronto, Canada) equipped with TurboIonSpray and Agilent HPLC system was used employing isotope dilution with deuterium labeled internal standard (IS=l-thyroxine-d2). Serum was filtered through the Centrifree YM-30 ultrafiltration device by centrifugation, IS added to the ultrafiltrate, and 400 microL injected onto a C-18 column. After washing, the switch valve is activated and a methanol gradient allows for elution of both T4 and the IS into the LC/MS/MS system. Quantitation was by MRM analysis in the negative mode. Equilibrium dialysis was performed by the Nichols method and analogue free T4 results were obtained on the Dade Dimension RxL. RESULTS: The within-day and between-day CV's were < 7.1% at all concentrations tested. The results correlated well with equilibrium dialysis (Eq Dial=0.971 MS+0.041, n=68, Syx=1.381, r=0.954). A poor correlation was found with the analogue (direct) free T4 method (IA=0.326 MS+6.27, n=154, Syx=1.96, r=0.459). CONCLUSIONS: Samples can be processed in batches of 30. The free T4 tandem MS method has a rapid turn-around-time vs the equilibrium dialysis procedure, with a chromatographic run time of 8 min per sample.
BACKGROUND: Most clinical chemistry laboratories measure free thyroxine (FT4) by an analogue (direct) method. Nevertheless, the validity of analogue FT4 immunoassays has been questioned and patient's results using this approach frequently do not fit in with the clinical presentation. Because of these problems we routinely send out all direct free T4's that are < 2.5th percentile and many that are > 97.5th percentile for measurement by equilibrium dialysis, the gold standard method. In approximately half of these cases, the FT4 by equilibrium dialysis was normal. We developed a rapid, reliable free T4 method employing isotope dilution tandem mass spectrometry and compared our results with both the analogue (direct) free T4 and equilibrium dialysis procedures. METHODS: An API-4000 tandem mass spectrometer (Sciex, Toronto, Canada) equipped with TurboIonSpray and Agilent HPLC system was used employing isotope dilution with deuterium labeled internal standard (IS=l-thyroxine-d2). Serum was filtered through the Centrifree YM-30 ultrafiltration device by centrifugation, IS added to the ultrafiltrate, and 400 microL injected onto a C-18 column. After washing, the switch valve is activated and a methanol gradient allows for elution of both T4 and the IS into the LC/MS/MS system. Quantitation was by MRM analysis in the negative mode. Equilibrium dialysis was performed by the Nichols method and analogue free T4 results were obtained on the Dade Dimension RxL. RESULTS: The within-day and between-day CV's were < 7.1% at all concentrations tested. The results correlated well with equilibrium dialysis (Eq Dial=0.971 MS+0.041, n=68, Syx=1.381, r=0.954). A poor correlation was found with the analogue (direct) free T4 method (IA=0.326 MS+6.27, n=154, Syx=1.96, r=0.459). CONCLUSIONS: Samples can be processed in batches of 30. The free T4 tandem MS method has a rapid turn-around-time vs the equilibrium dialysis procedure, with a chromatographic run time of 8 min per sample.
Authors: Andrea E DeBarber; Travis Geraci; Vincent P Colasurdo; Sarah A Hackenmueller; Thomas S Scanlan Journal: J Chromatogr A Date: 2008-09-12 Impact factor: 4.759
Authors: Connie M Rhee; Gregory A Brent; Csaba P Kovesdy; Offie P Soldin; Danh Nguyen; Matthew J Budoff; Steven M Brunelli; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2014-02-25 Impact factor: 5.992