BACKGROUND: Multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) scanners with retrospective ECG-gating permit visualization of the coronary arteries. Limited spatial and temporal resolution as well as breathing artefacts due to the scan time can cause poor distal vessel segment and side branch visualization. The latest MSCT generation with true 16-detector slices (Sensation 16), Siemens, Forchheim, Germany) provides furthermore improved temporal and spatial resolution, as well as significantly reduced scan time. To assess, whether this technical improvement has also an impact on image quality we conducted the following study. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Sixty-two consecutive patients (33 male, 29 female, mean age 63+/-8 [47-79] years, heart rate after beta-blockade 63+/-7 [45-86] bpm) with suspicion of coronary artery disease (CAD) were examined by cardiac MSCT. Parameter settings were: 0.75 mm collimation, 2.8mm table feed/rotation, caudocranial scan direction, 80 cc contrast media biphasic injection protocol, gantry rotation time 375 ms, temporal resolution 188 ms). Thirteen coronary segments (sgts) were evaluated in each patient (total number: 806 sgts). Image quality of each segment was determined as: excellent--free of motion artefacts, good--mild motion artefacts, relevant artefacts--still diagnostic value, severe calcification and insufficient image quality--not visualized segment. RESULTS: 301/806 (37%) sgts showed excellent and 294/806 (36%) sgts good image quality. Relevant artefacts were seen in 107/806 (13%) sgts, calcifications in 41/806 (5%) sgts. 63/806 (8%) sgts could not be visualized (34 of them (54%) either segment 9 or 10). Diagnostic image quality was achieved in 702/806 (87%) sgts. CONCLUSIONS: Due to true 16-slice technology and faster gantry rotation time MSCT image quality could be improved and allows a visualization of the entire coronary tree. Larger, randomized, catheter-controlled studies have to be conducted to determine, whether this improved visualization also translates into better diagnostic accuracy.
BACKGROUND: Multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) scanners with retrospective ECG-gating permit visualization of the coronary arteries. Limited spatial and temporal resolution as well as breathing artefacts due to the scan time can cause poor distal vessel segment and side branch visualization. The latest MSCT generation with true 16-detector slices (Sensation 16), Siemens, Forchheim, Germany) provides furthermore improved temporal and spatial resolution, as well as significantly reduced scan time. To assess, whether this technical improvement has also an impact on image quality we conducted the following study. METHODS AND MATERIAL: Sixty-two consecutive patients (33 male, 29 female, mean age 63+/-8 [47-79] years, heart rate after beta-blockade 63+/-7 [45-86] bpm) with suspicion of coronary artery disease (CAD) were examined by cardiac MSCT. Parameter settings were: 0.75 mm collimation, 2.8mm table feed/rotation, caudocranial scan direction, 80 cc contrast media biphasic injection protocol, gantry rotation time 375 ms, temporal resolution 188 ms). Thirteen coronary segments (sgts) were evaluated in each patient (total number: 806 sgts). Image quality of each segment was determined as: excellent--free of motion artefacts, good--mild motion artefacts, relevant artefacts--still diagnostic value, severe calcification and insufficient image quality--not visualized segment. RESULTS: 301/806 (37%) sgts showed excellent and 294/806 (36%) sgts good image quality. Relevant artefacts were seen in 107/806 (13%) sgts, calcifications in 41/806 (5%) sgts. 63/806 (8%) sgts could not be visualized (34 of them (54%) either segment 9 or 10). Diagnostic image quality was achieved in 702/806 (87%) sgts. CONCLUSIONS: Due to true 16-slice technology and faster gantry rotation time MSCT image quality could be improved and allows a visualization of the entire coronary tree. Larger, randomized, catheter-controlled studies have to be conducted to determine, whether this improved visualization also translates into better diagnostic accuracy.
Authors: S Schroeder; A F Kopp; A Baumbach; A Kuettner; C Georg; B Ohnesorge; C Herdeg; C D Claussen; K R Karsch Journal: Heart Date: 2001-05 Impact factor: 5.994
Authors: S Schroeder; A F Kopp; A Baumbach; A Kuettner; C Herdeg; A Rosenberger; H K Selbmann; C D Claussen; M Oberhoff; K R Karsch Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Koen Nieman; Filippo Cademartiri; Pedro A Lemos; Rolf Raaijmakers; Peter M T Pattynama; Pim J de Feyter Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-10-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: A F Kopp; S Schroeder; A Baumbach; A Kuettner; C Georg; B Ohnesorge; M Heuschmid; R Kuzo; C D Claussen Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2001 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Stephen Schroeder; Andreas F Kopp; Axel Kuettner; Christof Burgstahler; Christian Herdeg; Martin Heuschmid; Andreas Baumbach; Claus D Claussen; Karl R Karsch; Ludger Seipel Journal: Clin Imaging Date: 2002 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 1.605
Authors: Dieter Ropers; Ulrich Baum; Karsten Pohle; Katharina Anders; Stefan Ulzheimer; Bernd Ohnesorge; Christian Schlundt; Werner Bautz; Werner G Daniel; Stephan Achenbach Journal: Circulation Date: 2003-02-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Thomas C Gerber; Ronald S Kuzo; Gary E Lane; Peter C O'Brien; Nolan Karstaedt; Richard L Morin; Robert E Safford; Joseph L Blackshear; Jerald H Pietan Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2003 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Axel Kuettner; Andreas F Kopp; Stephen Schroeder; Thilo Rieger; Juergen Brunn; Christoph Meisner; Martin Heuschmid; Tobias Trabold; Christof Burgstahler; Jens Martensen; Wolfgang Schoebel; Hans-Konrad Selbmann; Claus D Claussen Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-03-03 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Gabija Pundziute; Joanne D Schuijf; Jeroen J Bax; Ernst E van der Wall Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2006-03-15 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Gabija Pundziute; Joanne D Schuijf; J Wouter Jukema; Hildo J Lamb; Albert de Roos; Ernst E van der Wall; Jeroen J Bax Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Matthijs F L Meijs; W Bob Meijboom; Mathias Prokop; Nico R Mollet; Carlos A G van Mieghem; Pieter A Doevendans; Pim J de Feyter; Maarten J Cramer Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2009-08-01 Impact factor: 2.357