Literature DB >> 16011710

Nonparametric estimation of ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard.

Xiao-Hua Zhou1, Pete Castelluccio, Chuan Zhou.   

Abstract

In the evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of tests, a gold standard on the disease status is required. However, in many complex diseases, it is impossible or unethical to obtain such a gold standard. If an imperfect standard is used, the estimated accuracy of the tests would be biased. This type of bias is called imperfect gold standard bias. In this article we develop a nonparametric maximum likelihood method for estimating ROC curves and their areas of ordinal-scale tests in the absence of a gold standard. Our simulation study shows that the proposed estimators for the ROC curve areas have good finite-sample properties in terms of bias and mean squared error. Further simulation studies show that our nonparametric approach is comparable to the binormal parametric method, and is easier to implement. Finally, we illustrate the application of the proposed method in a real clinical study on assessing the accuracy of seven specific pathologists in detecting carcinoma in situ of the uterine cervix.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16011710     DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00324.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  15 in total

1.  Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy in detecting ordered symptom statuses without a gold standard.

Authors:  Zheyu Wang; Xiao-Hua Zhou; Miqu Wang
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 5.899

2.  The meaning of the opposition between the healthy and the pathological and its consequences.

Authors:  Maël Lemoine
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2008-07-30

3.  Bayesian inference of species hybrids using multilocus dominant genetic markers.

Authors:  Eric C Anderson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the diagnosis of melioidosis: better than we thought.

Authors:  Direk Limmathurotsakul; Narisara Chantratita; Nittaya Teerawattanasook; Komson Piriyagitpaiboon; Aunchalee Thanwisai; Vanaporn Wuthiekanun; Nicholas P J Day; Ben Cooper; Sharon J Peacock
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Estimating confidence intervals for the difference in diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic categories without a gold standard.

Authors:  Le Kang; Chengjie Xiong; Lili Tian
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.681

6.  ROC Curve Analysis in the Presence of Imperfect Reference Standards.

Authors:  Peizhou Liao; Hao Wu; Tianwei Yu
Journal:  Stat Biosci       Date:  2016-07-19

7.  A crossed random effects modeling approach for estimating diagnostic accuracy from ordinal ratings without a gold standard.

Authors:  Yunlong Xie; Zhen Chen; Paul S Albert
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-03-26       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard test.

Authors:  Hsin-Neng Hsieh; Hsiu-Yuan Su; Xiao-Hua Zhou
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Bayesian analysis and classification of two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay tests without a gold standard.

Authors:  Jingyang Zhang; Kathryn Chaloner; James H McLinden; Jack T Stapleton
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Exceeding the limits of liver histology markers.

Authors:  Shruti H Mehta; Bryan Lau; Nezam H Afdhal; David L Thomas
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2008-10-18       Impact factor: 25.083

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.