Literature DB >> 18508754

Bayesian inference of species hybrids using multilocus dominant genetic markers.

Eric C Anderson1.   

Abstract

Neutral genetic markers are useful for identifying species hybrids in natural populations, especially when used in conjunction with statistical methods like the one implemented in the software NEWHYBRIDS. Here, a short description of the extension of NEWHYBRIDS to dominant markers is given. Subsequently, an extensive series of simulations of amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) data is performed to evaluate the prospects for hybrid identification with (possibly non-diagnostic) dominant markers. Distinguishing between F1's and F2's is shown to be difficult, possibly requiring upwards of 100 AFLP markers to be done accurately. Discriminating between pure-bred and non-pure (hybrid) individuals, however, is shown to be much easier, requiring perhaps as few as 10 dominant markers, even from relatively weakly diverged species.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18508754      PMCID: PMC2606736          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  21 in total

1.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Stephens; P Donnelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Basic principles of ROC analysis.

Authors:  C E Metz
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 4.446

3.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies.

Authors:  Daniel Falush; Matthew Stephens; Jonathan K Pritchard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Nonparametric estimation of ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard.

Authors:  Xiao-Hua Zhou; Pete Castelluccio; Chuan Zhou
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Studies on Hybrid Sterility. II. Localization of Sterility Factors in Drosophila Pseudoobscura Hybrids.

Authors:  T Dobzhansky
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1936-03       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Hybrid zones-natural laboratories for evolutionary studies.

Authors:  G M Hewitt
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 17.712

7.  Genealogy, morphology and fitness of spontaneous hybrids between wild and cultivated chicory (Cichorium intybus).

Authors:  L P Kiaer; M Philipp; R B Jørgensen; T P Hauser
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2007-05-02       Impact factor: 3.821

8.  Genomic evidence for divergence with gene flow in host races of the larch budmoth.

Authors:  Igor Emelianov; Frantisek Marec; James Mallet
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Genome-wide patterns of gene flow across a house mouse hybrid zone.

Authors:  Katherine C Teeter; Bret A Payseur; Leslie W Harris; Margaret A Bakewell; Lisa M Thibodeau; Janelle E O'Brien; James G Krenz; Maria A Sans-Fuentes; Michael W Nachman; Priscilla K Tucker
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: dominant markers and null alleles.

Authors:  Daniel Falush; Matthew Stephens; Jonathan K Pritchard
Journal:  Mol Ecol Notes       Date:  2007-07-01
View more
  26 in total

1.  Conspecific versus heterospecific gene exchange between populations of Darwin's finches.

Authors:  Peter R Grant; B Rosemary Grant
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Evolutionary processes in an undescribed eucalypt: implications for the translocation of a critically endangered species.

Authors:  Susan Rutherford; Trevor C Wilson; Jia-Yee Samantha Yap; Enhua Lee; Graeme Errington; Maurizio Rossetto
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2022-09-26       Impact factor: 5.040

3.  Asymmetric reproductive isolation between terminal forms of the salamander ring species Ensatina eschscholtzii revealed by fine-scale genetic analysis of a hybrid zone.

Authors:  Thomas J Devitt; Stuart J E Baird; Craig Moritz
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2011-08-22       Impact factor: 3.260

4.  Genomic markers reveal introgressive hybridization in the Indo-West Pacific mangroves: a case study.

Authors:  Mei Sun; Eugenia Y Y Lo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Testing Taxon Tenacity of Tortoises: evidence for a geographical selection gradient at a secondary contact zone.

Authors:  Taylor Edwards; Kristin H Berry; Richard D Inman; Todd C Esque; Kenneth E Nussear; Cristina A Jones; Melanie Culver
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2015-04-30       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  Variation in the frequency and extent of hybridization between Leucosceptrum japonicum and L. stellipilum (Lamiaceae) in the Central Japanese Mainland.

Authors:  Yue Li; Masayuki Maki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Successive invasion-mediated interspecific hybridizations and population structure in the endangered cichlid Oreochromis mossambicus.

Authors:  Cyril Firmat; Paul Alibert; Michèle Losseau; Jean-François Baroiller; Ulrich K Schliewen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Non-homogeneous combination of two porous genomes induces complex body shape trajectories in cyprinid hybrids.

Authors:  Melthide Sinama; André Gilles; Caroline Costedoat; Emmanuel Corse; Jean-Michel Olivier; Rémi Chappaz; Nicolas Pech
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.172

9.  Hybridization in natural sympatric populations of Dermacentor ticks in northwestern North America.

Authors:  A Araya-Anchetta; G A Scoles; J Giles; J D Busch; D M Wagner
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-02-14       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Introduction. Extent, processes and evolutionary impact of interspecific hybridization in animals.

Authors:  Klaus Schwenk; Nora Brede; Bruno Streit
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-09-12       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.