Literature DB >> 16010649

Is white blood cell reduction equivalent to antibody screening in preventing transmission of cytomegalovirus by transfusion? A review of the literature and meta-analysis.

Eleftherios C Vamvakas1.   

Abstract

The question whether the use of cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seronegative versus white blood cell (WBC)-reduced blood components is equally efficacious in preventing transfusion-acquired CMV infection remains unresolved. A total of 829 recipients of CMV-seronegative components were followed in 11 studies, and a total of 878 recipients of WBC-reduced components were followed in 12 studies. Twelve (1.45%) of 829 recipients of CMV-seronegative components and 24 (2.73%) of 878 recipients of WBC-reduced components developed CMV infection in these studies. Among bone marrow transplant (BMT) recipients, the risk of CMV infection was, respectively, 1.63% (11/674) and 3.01% (21/697). Four of 7 controlled studies of CMV-seronegative components and 1 of 3 controlled studies of WBC-reduced components indicated benefit from these special components compared with CMV-unscreened/non-WBC-reduced components. One of 3 controlled studies indicated benefit from CMV-seronegative components, as compared with WBC-reduced components. Across a subset of studies whose results were integrated in a meta-analysis, CMV-seronegative or WBC-reduced components were virtually equivalent to each other when they were compared with CMV-unscreened/non-WBC-reduced components. CMV-seronegative components were associated with a 93.1% reduction in the risk of CMV infection; WBC-reduced components were associated with a 92.3% reduction in risk (summary odds ratio [OR] = 0.069; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.037-0.128; P < .05; and summary OR = 0.077; 95% CI, 0.031-0.190; P < .05, respectively). However, across 3 studies that compared CMV-seronegative and WBC-reduced components to each other, CMV-seronegative components were associated with a 58% reduction in risk (summary OR = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.22-0.79; P < .05). Thus, a meta-analysis of the available controlled studies indicates that CMV-seronegative blood components are more efficacious than WBC-reduced blood components in preventing transfusion-acquired CMV infection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16010649     DOI: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2005.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfus Med Rev        ISSN: 0887-7963


  25 in total

Review 1.  Leucoreduction of blood components: an effective way to increase blood safety?

Authors:  Maria Bianchi; Stefania Vaglio; Simonetta Pupella; Giuseppe Marano; Giuseppina Facco; Giancarlo M Liumbruno; Giuliano Grazzini
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  Cytomegalovirus and Epstein-Barr virus reactivation in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  O Coşkun; E Yazici; F Şahiner; A Karakaş; S Kiliç; M Tekin; C Artuk; L Yamanel; B A Beşirbellioğlu
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 0.840

3.  What every physician should know about transfusion reactions.

Authors:  Suzanne Bakdash; Mark H Yazer
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Prevention of Transfusion-Transmitted Cytomegalovirus Infections: Which is the Optimal Strategy?

Authors:  Malte Ziemann; Holger Hennig
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 3.747

Review 5.  [Erythrocyte transfusion: update of the guidelines "therapy with blood components and plasma derivatives"].

Authors:  M Welte
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  11 Adverse Reactions.

Authors: 
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.747

Review 7.  Risk of cytomegalovirus transmission by blood products after solid organ transplantation.

Authors:  Deborah Jebakumar; Patti Bryant; Walter Linz
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2019-04-23

8.  Seroprevalence of Cytomegalovirus among Voluntary Blood Donors.

Authors:  C N Chaudhari; M S Bindra
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2011-07-21

9.  The effects of red cell transfusion donor age on nosocomial infection among trauma patients.

Authors:  Tyler J Loftus; Ryan M Thomas; Travis W Murphy; Linda L Nguyen; Frederick A Moore; Scott C Brakenridge; Philip A Efron; Alicia M Mohr
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Prevention of maternal cytomegalovirus infection: current status and future prospects.

Authors:  Jessica L Nyholm; Mark R Schleiss
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.