AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Insulin autoantibodies (IAA) precede and predict the onset of type 1 diabetes, but not all children with IAA develop the disease. In affected families, IAA affinity can identify IAA-positive children who are more likely to progress to diabetes. The purpose of this study was to determine whether affinity is a useful marker to stratify type 1 diabetes risk in IAA-positive children from the general population. METHODS: IAA affinity was determined by competitive binding to 125I-insulin with increasing concentrations of cold insulin and with cold proinsulin in sera from 46 IAA-positive children identified in the Karlsburg Type 1 Diabetes Risk Study of a Normal Schoolchild Population in north-eastern Germany. RESULTS: IAA affinity ranged between 5 x 10(6) and 1.2 x 10(11) l/mol. IAA affinity was higher in 24 children who developed multiple islet autoantibodies or diabetes (median 3.5 x 10(9) l/mol; interquartile range [IQR] 2.1x10(9) to 2.1 x 10(10) l/mol) than in 22 children who did not develop multiple islet autoantibodies or diabetes (median 1.3 x 10(8) l/mol; IQR 3.8 x 10(7) to 7.2 x 10(8) l/mol; p<0.0001). Using a threshold of > or = 10(9) l/mol, 22 of the 24 children who developed multiple islet autoantibodies or diabetes were correctly identified by high-affinity IAA and 18 of 22 who did not develop multiple islet autoantibodies or diabetes were correctly identified by low-affinity IAA. IAA affinity was significantly higher in samples with proinsulin reactive IAA (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: IAA affinity measurement provides robust identification of IAA associated with high diabetes risk.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Insulin autoantibodies (IAA) precede and predict the onset of type 1 diabetes, but not all children with IAA develop the disease. In affected families, IAA affinity can identify IAA-positive children who are more likely to progress to diabetes. The purpose of this study was to determine whether affinity is a useful marker to stratify type 1 diabetes risk in IAA-positive children from the general population. METHODS:IAA affinity was determined by competitive binding to 125I-insulin with increasing concentrations of cold insulin and with cold proinsulin in sera from 46 IAA-positive children identified in the Karlsburg Type 1 Diabetes Risk Study of a Normal Schoolchild Population in north-eastern Germany. RESULTS:IAA affinity ranged between 5 x 10(6) and 1.2 x 10(11) l/mol. IAA affinity was higher in 24 children who developed multiple islet autoantibodies or diabetes (median 3.5 x 10(9) l/mol; interquartile range [IQR] 2.1x10(9) to 2.1 x 10(10) l/mol) than in 22 children who did not develop multiple islet autoantibodies or diabetes (median 1.3 x 10(8) l/mol; IQR 3.8 x 10(7) to 7.2 x 10(8) l/mol; p<0.0001). Using a threshold of > or = 10(9) l/mol, 22 of the 24 children who developed multiple islet autoantibodies or diabetes were correctly identified by high-affinity IAA and 18 of 22 who did not develop multiple islet autoantibodies or diabetes were correctly identified by low-affinity IAA. IAA affinity was significantly higher in samples with proinsulin reactive IAA (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION:IAA affinity measurement provides robust identification of IAA associated with high diabetes risk.
Authors: L Yu; D T Robles; N Abiru; P Kaur; M Rewers; K Kelemen; G S Eisenbarth Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2000-02-15 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: P G Colman; C Steele; J J Couper; S J Beresford; T Powell; K Kewming; A Pollard; S Gellert; B Tait; M Honeyman; L C Harrison Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Michael Schlosser; Martina Strebelow; Ilona Rjasanowski; Wolfgang Kerner; Ralf Wassmuth; Manfred Ziegler Journal: Ann N Y Acad Sci Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 5.691
Authors: T Kimpimäki; P Kulmala; K Savola; A Kupila; S Korhonen; T Simell; J Ilonen; O Simell; M Knip Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab Date: 2002-10 Impact factor: 5.958
Authors: Jay M Sosenko; Liping Yu; Jay S Skyler; Jeffrey P Krischer; Peter A Gottlieb; David Boulware; Dongmei Miao; Jerry P Palmer; Andrea K Steck Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2017-02-08 Impact factor: 6.118
Authors: Samppa J Ryhänen; Taina Härkönen; Heli Siljander; Kirsti Näntö-Salonen; Tuula Simell; Heikki Hyöty; Jorma Ilonen; Riitta Veijola; Olli Simell; Mikael Knip Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2011-04-22 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Liping Yu; Dongmei Miao; Laura Scrimgeour; Kelly Johnson; Marian Rewers; George S Eisenbarth Journal: Diabetes Date: 2011-11-28 Impact factor: 9.461