AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Subtyping GAD autoantibody (GADA) responses using affinity measurement allows the identification of GADA-positive children with a family history of type 1 diabetes who are at risk of developing diabetes. Here, we asked whether GADA affinity is a useful marker to stratify the risk of type 1 diabetes in GADA-positive schoolchildren from the general population. METHODS: GADA affinity was measured by competitive binding experiments with [(125)I]-labelled and unlabelled human 65 kDa isoform of GAD (GAD65) in sera from 97 GADA-positive children identified in the Karlsburg Type 1 Diabetes Risk Study of a general schoolchild population in north-eastern Germany. GADA epitope specificity was determined using radiobinding assays with [(35)S]-labelled GAD65/67 kDa isoform of GAD (GAD67) chimeric proteins. RESULTS: GADA affinity was high, ≥ 10(10) l/mol, in 33 of 35 multiple islet autoantibody-positive children. In contrast, the affinity ranged widely among 62 single GADA-positive children (median 3.1 × 10(9) l/mol; range 5.6 × 10(6) to >4.0 × 10(11) l/mol; p < 0.0001). High-affinity GADA were associated with HLA-DRB1*03 (p = 0.02) and predominantly directed against the C-terminal and/or middle part of the GAD65 protein. At follow-up, the affinity remained relatively constant. Five of the single GADA-positive children developed additional islet autoantibodies and had high-affinity GADA. Twenty-six children progressed to type 1 diabetes; among them, 23 had GADA affinities of ≥ 10(10) l/mol before disease onset. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Schoolchildren from the general population may develop heterogeneous GADA responses, and a high affinity can identify those GADA-positive children who are more likely to progress to type 1 diabetes.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: Subtyping GAD autoantibody (GADA) responses using affinity measurement allows the identification of GADA-positive children with a family history of type 1 diabetes who are at risk of developing diabetes. Here, we asked whether GADA affinity is a useful marker to stratify the risk of type 1 diabetes in GADA-positive schoolchildren from the general population. METHODS:GADA affinity was measured by competitive binding experiments with [(125)I]-labelled and unlabelled human 65 kDa isoform of GAD (GAD65) in sera from 97 GADA-positive children identified in the Karlsburg Type 1 Diabetes Risk Study of a general schoolchild population in north-eastern Germany. GADA epitope specificity was determined using radiobinding assays with [(35)S]-labelled GAD65/67 kDa isoform of GAD (GAD67) chimeric proteins. RESULTS:GADA affinity was high, ≥ 10(10) l/mol, in 33 of 35 multiple islet autoantibody-positive children. In contrast, the affinity ranged widely among 62 single GADA-positive children (median 3.1 × 10(9) l/mol; range 5.6 × 10(6) to >4.0 × 10(11) l/mol; p < 0.0001). High-affinity GADA were associated with HLA-DRB1*03 (p = 0.02) and predominantly directed against the C-terminal and/or middle part of the GAD65 protein. At follow-up, the affinity remained relatively constant. Five of the single GADA-positive children developed additional islet autoantibodies and had high-affinity GADA. Twenty-six children progressed to type 1 diabetes; among them, 23 had GADA affinities of ≥ 10(10) l/mol before disease onset. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: Schoolchildren from the general population may develop heterogeneous GADA responses, and a high affinity can identify those GADA-positive children who are more likely to progress to type 1 diabetes.
Authors: V Parikka; K Näntö-Salonen; M Saarinen; T Simell; J Ilonen; H Hyöty; R Veijola; M Knip; O Simell Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2012-03-23 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: P Achenbach; V Lampasona; U Landherr; K Koczwara; S Krause; H Grallert; C Winkler; M Pflüger; T Illig; E Bonifacio; A G Ziegler Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2009-07-10 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Andrea K Steck; Alexandra Fouts; Dongmei Miao; Zhiyuan Zhao; Fran Dong; Jay Sosenko; Peter Gottlieb; Marian J Rewers; Liping Yu Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2016-03-18 Impact factor: 6.118
Authors: Alistair J K Williams; Vito Lampasona; Michael Schlosser; Patricia W Mueller; David L Pittman; William E Winter; Beena Akolkar; Rebecca Wyatt; Cristina Brigatti; Stephanie Krause; Peter Achenbach Journal: Diabetes Date: 2015-05-13 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Aldana Trabucchi; Silvina S Bombicino; Alexandra M Targovnik; Juan I Marfía; Adriana V Sabljic; Natalia I Faccinetti; Luciano L Guerra; Ruben F Iacono; María V Miranda; Silvina N Valdez Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2019-01-29 Impact factor: 4.379