Objective: Large-scale screening of the general population for islet autoantibodies (IAbs) to detect type 1 diabetes (T1D) has started worldwide. The standard screening method of separate radio-binding assay (RBA) for each IAb is an inefficient bottleneck. Furthermore, most positive results by RBA in screening of general population individuals without a clinical diagnosis of T1D are low-affinity and not predictive of future diabetes. Research Design and Methods: We have developed and validated a novel 6-Plex assay based on electrochemiluminescence (ECL) technology that combines in a single well high-affinity IAbs (to insulin, GAD, IA-2, and ZnT8), transglutaminase autoantibodies for celiac disease, and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antibodies. The Autoimmunity Screening for Kids (ASK) provided 880 serum samples, from 828 children aged 1-17 years without diabetes who were previously tested for IAbs using single ECL assays and RBA assays. Results: Levels of all six antibodies in the 6-Plex ECL assay correlated well with respective single ECL assay levels. Similar to single ECL assays, the 6-Plex ECL assay positivity was congruent with the RBA in 95% (35/37) of children who later developed T1D and in 88% (105/119) high-risk children with multiple IAbs. In contrast, only 56% (86/154, P < 0.0001) of children with persistent single IAb by RBA were found to be positive by 6-Plex ECL assay. Of 555 samples negative for all IAbs by RBA, few (0.2%-0.5%) were positive at low levels in the 6-Plex ECL assay. Conclusions: The study demonstrated that the 6-Plex ECL assay compares favorably to the standard RBAs in terms of disease specificity for general population screening in children. The 6-Plex ECL assay was therefore adopted as the primary screening tool in the general population screening ASK program with advantages of high efficiency, low cost, and low serum volume.
Objective: Large-scale screening of the general population for islet autoantibodies (IAbs) to detect type 1 diabetes (T1D) has started worldwide. The standard screening method of separate radio-binding assay (RBA) for each IAb is an inefficient bottleneck. Furthermore, most positive results by RBA in screening of general population individuals without a clinical diagnosis of T1D are low-affinity and not predictive of future diabetes. Research Design and Methods: We have developed and validated a novel 6-Plex assay based on electrochemiluminescence (ECL) technology that combines in a single well high-affinity IAbs (to insulin, GAD, IA-2, and ZnT8), transglutaminase autoantibodies for celiac disease, and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antibodies. The Autoimmunity Screening for Kids (ASK) provided 880 serum samples, from 828 children aged 1-17 years without diabetes who were previously tested for IAbs using single ECL assays and RBA assays. Results: Levels of all six antibodies in the 6-Plex ECL assay correlated well with respective single ECL assay levels. Similar to single ECL assays, the 6-Plex ECL assay positivity was congruent with the RBA in 95% (35/37) of children who later developed T1D and in 88% (105/119) high-risk children with multiple IAbs. In contrast, only 56% (86/154, P < 0.0001) of children with persistent single IAb by RBA were found to be positive by 6-Plex ECL assay. Of 555 samples negative for all IAbs by RBA, few (0.2%-0.5%) were positive at low levels in the 6-Plex ECL assay. Conclusions: The study demonstrated that the 6-Plex ECL assay compares favorably to the standard RBAs in terms of disease specificity for general population screening in children. The 6-Plex ECL assay was therefore adopted as the primary screening tool in the general population screening ASK program with advantages of high efficiency, low cost, and low serum volume.
Entities:
Keywords:
Autoantibodies; General population; Multiplex ECL assay; Type 1 diabetes
Authors: Dongmei Miao; Andrea K Steck; Li Zhang; K Michelle Guyer; Ling Jiang; Taylor Armstrong; Sarah M Muller; Jeffrey Krischer; Marian Rewers; Liping Yu Journal: Diabetes Technol Ther Date: 2015-01-06 Impact factor: 6.118
Authors: M Schlosser; K Koczwara; H Kenk; M Strebelow; I Rjasanowski; R Wassmuth; P Achenbach; A-G Ziegler; E Bonifacio Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2005-07-12 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: R Brett McQueen; Cristy Geno Rasmussen; Kathleen Waugh; Brigitte I Frohnert; Andrea K Steck; Liping Yu; Judith Baxter; Marian Rewers Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2020-04-23 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Dongmei Miao; K Michelle Guyer; Fran Dong; Ling Jiang; Andrea K Steck; Marian Rewers; George S Eisenbarth; Liping Yu Journal: Diabetes Date: 2013-08-23 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Peter Achenbach; Mohammed I Hawa; Stephanie Krause; Vito Lampasona; Samuel T Jerram; Alistair J K Williams; Ezio Bonifacio; Anette G Ziegler; R David Leslie Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2018-04-04 Impact factor: 10.122