Literature DB >> 16007335

Relationship between bone morphology and bone quality in male tibias: implications for stress fracture risk.

Steven M Tommasini1, Philip Nasser, Mitchell B Schaffler, Karl J Jepsen.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Biomechanical properties were assessed from the tibias of 17 adult males 17-46 years of age. Tissue-level mechanical properties varied with bone size. Narrower tibias were comprised of tissue that was more brittle and more prone to accumulating damage compared with tissue from wider tibias.
INTRODUCTION: A better understanding of the factors contributing to stress fractures is needed to identify new prevention strategies that will reduce fracture incidence. Having a narrow (i.e., more slender) tibia relative to body mass has been shown to be a major predictor of stress fracture risk and fragility in male military recruits and male athletes. The intriguing possibility that slender bones, like those shown in animal models, may be composed of more damageable material has not been considered in the human skeleton.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Polar moment of inertia, section modulus, and antero-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) widths were determined for tibial diaphyses from 17 male donors 17-46 years of age. A slenderness index was defined as the inverse ratio of the section modulus to tibia length and body weight. Eight prismatic cortical bone samples were generated from each tibia, and tissue-level mechanical properties including modulus, strength, total energy, postyield strain, and tissue damageability were measured by four-point bending from monotonic (n = 4/tibia) and damage accumulation (n = 4/tibia) test methods. Partial correlation coefficients were determined between each geometrical parameter and each tissue-level mechanical property while taking age into consideration.
RESULTS: Significant correlations were observed between tibial morphology and the mechanical properties that characterized tissue brittleness and damageability. Positive correlations were observed between measures of bone size (AP width) and measures of tissue ductility (postyield strain, total energy), and negative correlations were observed between bone size (moment of inertia, section modulus) and tissue modulus.
CONCLUSIONS: The correlation analysis suggested that bone morphology could be used as a predictor of tissue fragility and stress fracture risk. The average mechanical properties of cortical tissue varied as a function of the overall size of the bone. Therefore, under extreme loading conditions (e.g., military training), variation in bone quality parameters related to damageability may be a contributing factor to the increased risk of stress fracture for individuals with more slender bones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16007335     DOI: 10.1359/JBMR.050326

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  42 in total

Review 1.  Aging and bone.

Authors:  A L Boskey; R Coleman
Journal:  J Dent Res       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 6.116

Review 2.  Functional interactions among morphologic and tissue quality traits define bone quality.

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Zoledronate treatment has different effects in mouse strains with contrasting baseline bone mechanical phenotypes.

Authors:  M W Aref; E M B McNerny; D Brown; K J Jepsen; M R Allen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Femoral Neck External Size but not aBMD Predicts Structural and Mass Changes for Women Transitioning Through Menopause.

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen; Andrew Kozminski; Erin Mr Bigelow; Stephen H Schlecht; Robert W Goulet; Sioban D Harlow; Jane A Cauley; Carrie Karvonen-Gutierrez
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  Skeletal outcomes by peripheral quantitative computed tomography and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in adolescent girls with anorexia nervosa.

Authors:  A D DiVasta; H A Feldman; J M O'Donnell; J Long; M B Leonard; C M Gordon
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 6.  A biomechanical perspective on bone quality.

Authors:  C J Hernandez; T M Keaveny
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 4.398

7.  The amount of periosteal apposition required to maintain bone strength during aging depends on adult bone morphology and tissue-modulus degradation rate.

Authors:  Karl J Jepsen; Nelly Andarawis-Puri
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Interindividual variation in functionally adapted trait sets is established during postnatal growth and predictable based on bone robustness.

Authors:  Nirnimesh Pandey; Siddharth Bhola; Andrew Goldstone; Fred Chen; Jessica Chrzanowski; Carl J Terranova; Richard Ghillani; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 6.741

9.  Bone density, structure, and strength in juvenile idiopathic arthritis: importance of disease severity and muscle deficits.

Authors:  Jon M Burnham; Justine Shults; Sarah E Dubner; Harjeet Sembhi; Babette S Zemel; Mary B Leonard
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2008-08

10.  Fourier transform infrared imaging microspectroscopy and tissue-level mechanical testing reveal intraspecies variation in mouse bone mineral and matrix composition.

Authors:  Hayden-William Courtland; Philip Nasser; Andrew B Goldstone; Lyudmila Spevak; Adele L Boskey; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 4.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.