Literature DB >> 16007070

Initiation of epigenetic reprogramming of the X chromosome in somatic nuclei transplanted to a mouse oocyte.

Siqin Bao1, Naoki Miyoshi, Ikuhiro Okamoto, Thomas Jenuwein, Edith Heard, M Azim Surani.   

Abstract

The active and inactive X chromosomes have distinct epigenetic marks in somatic nuclei, which undergo reprogramming after transplantation into oocytes. We show that, despite the disappearance of Xist RNA coating in 30 min, the epigenetic memory of the inactive X persists with the precocious appearance of histone H3 trimethylation of lysine 27 (H3-3meK27), without the expected colocalization with Eed/Ezh2. Subsequently, Xist re-appears on the original inactive X, and the silent Xist on the active X undergoes re-activation, resulting in unusual biallelic Xist RNA domains. Despite this abnormal Xist expression pattern, colocalization of H3-3meK27 and Eed is thereafter confined to a single Xist domain, which is presumably on the original inactive X. These epigenetic events differ markedly from the kinetics of preferential paternal X inactivation in normal embryos. All the epigenetic marks on the X are apparently erased in the epiblast, suggesting that the oocyte and epiblast may have distinct properties for stepwise programming of the genome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16007070      PMCID: PMC1369137          DOI: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  EMBO Rep        ISSN: 1469-221X            Impact factor:   8.807


  26 in total

1.  Preferential inactivation of the paternally derived X chromosome in the extraembryonic membranes of the mouse.

Authors:  N Takagi; M Sasaki
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-08-21       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Epigenetic dynamics of imprinted X inactivation during early mouse development.

Authors:  Ikuhiro Okamoto; Arie P Otte; C David Allis; Danny Reinberg; Edith Heard
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-12-11       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Reactivation of the paternal X chromosome in early mouse embryos.

Authors:  Winifred Mak; Tatyana B Nesterova; Mariana de Napoles; Ruth Appanah; Shinya Yamanaka; Arie P Otte; Neil Brockdorff
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-01-30       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 4.  Recent advances in X-chromosome inactivation.

Authors:  Edith Heard
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 8.382

5.  Conservation of position and exclusive expression of mouse Xist from the inactive X chromosome.

Authors:  N Brockdorff; A Ashworth; G F Kay; P Cooper; S Smith; V M McCabe; D P Norris; G D Penny; D Patel; S Rastan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-05-23       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Relationship between the parental origin of the X chromosomes, embryonic cell lineage and X chromosome expression in mice.

Authors:  V E Papaioannou; J D West
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1981-04       Impact factor: 1.588

7.  A gene from the region of the human X inactivation centre is expressed exclusively from the inactive X chromosome.

Authors:  C J Brown; A Ballabio; J L Rupert; R G Lafreniere; M Grompe; R Tonlorenzi; H F Willard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-01-03       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Expression of Xist during mouse development suggests a role in the initiation of X chromosome inactivation.

Authors:  G F Kay; G D Penny; D Patel; A Ashworth; N Brockdorff; S Rastan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-01-29       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Differential histone H3 Lys-9 and Lys-27 methylation profiles on the X chromosome.

Authors:  Claire Rougeulle; Julie Chaumeil; Kavitha Sarma; C David Allis; Danny Reinberg; Philip Avner; Edith Heard
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  A chromosomal memory triggered by Xist regulates histone methylation in X inactivation.

Authors:  Alexander Kohlmaier; Fabio Savarese; Monika Lachner; Joost Martens; Thomas Jenuwein; Anton Wutz
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2004-07-13       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  19 in total

1.  Repressive and active histone methylation mark distinct promoters in human and mouse spermatozoa.

Authors:  Urszula Brykczynska; Mizue Hisano; Serap Erkek; Liliana Ramos; Edward J Oakeley; Tim C Roloff; Christian Beisel; Dirk Schübeler; Michael B Stadler; Antoine H F M Peters
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 15.369

2.  Efficiencies and mechanisms of nuclear reprogramming.

Authors:  V Pasque; K Miyamoto; J B Gurdon
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  2010-11-03

3.  Defective chromatin structure in somatic cell cloned mouse embryos.

Authors:  Miao Zhang; Fengchao Wang; Zhaohui Kou; Yu Zhang; Shaorong Gao
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Understanding the X chromosome inactivation cycle in mice: a comprehensive view provided by nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Mami Oikawa; Kimiko Inoue; Hirosuke Shiura; Shogo Matoba; Satoshi Kamimura; Michiko Hirose; Kazuyuki Mekada; Atsushi Yoshiki; Satoshi Tanaka; Kuniya Abe; Fumitoshi Ishino; Atsuo Ogura
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 4.528

Review 5.  Regulation of X-chromosome inactivation by the X-inactivation centre.

Authors:  Sandrine Augui; Elphège P Nora; Edith Heard
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  X-inactivation and X-reactivation: epigenetic hallmarks of mammalian reproduction and pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Bernhard Payer; Jeannie T Lee; Satoshi H Namekawa
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-06-12       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Identification of inappropriately reprogrammed genes by large-scale transcriptome analysis of individual cloned mouse blastocysts.

Authors:  Atsushi Fukuda; Feng Cao; Shinnosuke Morita; Kaori Yamada; Yuko Jincho; Shouji Tane; Yusuke Sotomaru; Tomohiro Kono
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Histone variant macroH2A confers resistance to nuclear reprogramming.

Authors:  Vincent Pasque; Astrid Gillich; Nigel Garrett; John B Gurdon
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  Epigenetic reversion of post-implantation epiblast to pluripotent embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Siqin Bao; Fuchou Tang; Xihe Li; Katsuhiko Hayashi; Astrid Gillich; Kaiqin Lao; M Azim Surani
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Xenopus egg extract treatment reduced global DNA methylation of donor cells and enhanced somatic cell nuclear transfer embryo development in pigs.

Authors:  Xiaoyu Yang; Jiude Mao; Eric M Walters; Ming-Tao Zhao; Jennifer Teson; Kiho Lee; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Biores Open Access       Date:  2012-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.