PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To delineate how recent findings on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) can improve prediction of risk, detection, and prediction of clinical endpoints of prostate cancer (PCa). RECENT FINDINGS: The widely used PSA cut-point of 4.0 ng/ml increasingly appears arbitrary, but no cut-point achieves both high sensitivity and high specificity. The accuracy of detecting PCa can be increased by additional predictive factors and a combinations of markers. Evidence implies that a panel of kallikrein markers improves the specificity and reduces costs by eliminating unnecessary biopsies. Large, population-based studies have provided evidence that PSA can be used to predict PCa risk many years in advance, improve treatment selection and patient care, and predict the risk of complications and disease recurrence. However, definitive evidence is currently lacking as to whether PSA screening lowers PCa -specific mortality. SUMMARY: PSA is still the main tool for early detection, risk stratification, and monitoring of PCa. However, PSA values are affected by many technical and biological factors. Instead of using a fixed PSA cut-point, using statistical prediction models and considering the integration additional markers may be able to improve and individualize PCa diagnostics. A single PSA measurement at early middle age can predict risk of advanced PCa decades in advance and stratify patients for intensity of subsequent screening.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To delineate how recent findings on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) can improve prediction of risk, detection, and prediction of clinical endpoints of prostate cancer (PCa). RECENT FINDINGS: The widely used PSA cut-point of 4.0 ng/ml increasingly appears arbitrary, but no cut-point achieves both high sensitivity and high specificity. The accuracy of detecting PCa can be increased by additional predictive factors and a combinations of markers. Evidence implies that a panel of kallikrein markers improves the specificity and reduces costs by eliminating unnecessary biopsies. Large, population-based studies have provided evidence that PSA can be used to predict PCa risk many years in advance, improve treatment selection and patient care, and predict the risk of complications and disease recurrence. However, definitive evidence is currently lacking as to whether PSA screening lowers PCa -specific mortality. SUMMARY:PSA is still the main tool for early detection, risk stratification, and monitoring of PCa. However, PSA values are affected by many technical and biological factors. Instead of using a fixed PSA cut-point, using statistical prediction models and considering the integration additional markers may be able to improve and individualize PCa diagnostics. A single PSA measurement at early middle age can predict risk of advanced PCa decades in advance and stratify patients for intensity of subsequent screening.
Authors: Xiaoju Wang; Jianjun Yu; Arun Sreekumar; Sooryanarayana Varambally; Ronglai Shen; Donald Giacherio; Rohit Mehra; James E Montie; Kenneth J Pienta; Martin G Sanda; Philip W Kantoff; Mark A Rubin; John T Wei; Debashis Ghosh; Arul M Chinnaiyan Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2005-09-22 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: John Concato; Carolyn K Wells; Ralph I Horwitz; David Penson; Graeme Fincke; Dan R Berlowitz; Gregory Froehlich; Dawna Blake; Martyn A Vickers; Gerald A Gehr; Nabil H Raheb; Gail Sullivan; Peter Peduzzi Journal: Arch Intern Med Date: 2006-01-09
Authors: Martijn P M Q van Gils; Daphne Hessels; Onno van Hooij; Sander A Jannink; W Pim Peelen; Suzanne L J Hanssen; J Alfred Witjes; Erik B Cornel; Herbert F M Karthaus; Geert A H J Smits; Gerhard A Dijkman; Peter F A Mulders; Jack A Schalken Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2007-02-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Amit Gupta; Yair Lotan; Raheela Ashfaq; Claus G Roehrborn; Ganesh V Raj; Corinne C Aragaki; Francesco Montorsi; Shahrokh F Shariat Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2008-06-23 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: James A Eastham; Elyn Riedel; Peter T Scardino; Moshe Shike; Martin Fleisher; Arthur Schatzkin; Elaine Lanza; Lianne Latkany; Colin B Begg Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-05-28 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Sven Wenske; Ruslan Korets; Angel M Cronin; Andrew J Vickers; Martin Fleisher; Howard I Scher; Kim Pettersson; Bertrand Guillonneau; Peter T Scardino; James A Eastham; Hans Lilja Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2009-02-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: Giuseppe Coppolino; Davide Bolignano; Laura Rivoli; Giuseppe Mazza; Piera Presta; Giorgio Fuiano Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-02-06 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Shao Wei Xie; Yan Qing Wang; Bai Jun Dong; Jian Guo Xia; Hong Li Li; Shi Jun Zhang; Feng Hua Li; Wei Xue Journal: J Cancer Date: 2018-10-22 Impact factor: 4.207