Literature DB >> 12028801

Using performance indicators to improve health care quality in the public sector: a review of the literature.

Tim Freeman1.   

Abstract

Given the increasing importance of performance indicators in current UK health policy, this paper provides a systematic review of empirical and theoretical writings concerning their use to improve health care quality. The paper outlines potential problems and explores how best to derive, implement and use performance indicator data, presenting results thematically. The two principal uses of indicator systems are as summative mechanisms for external accountability and verification, and as formative mechanisms for internal quality improvement. In the UK, the use of performance indicators in assurance and performance management systems has heavily influenced debate over their value. Major problems reported include the potential to undermine the conditions required for quality improvement, perverse incentives and the difficulty of using data to promote change. Technical problems include indicator selection; the availability, validity and reliability of data; confounding; and problems with robustness, sensitivity and specificity. Factors that help in the derivation, implementation and use of indicator systems include clear objectives, involvement of stakeholders in development, and use of 'soft' data to aid interpretation.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12028801     DOI: 10.1258/0951484021912897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Manage Res        ISSN: 0951-4848


  50 in total

1.  Antidepressant drugs affect dopamine uptake.

Authors:  A E Halaris; K T Belendiuk; D X Freedman
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  1975-10-15       Impact factor: 5.858

2.  Achieving progress through clinical governance? A national study of health care managers' perceptions in the NHS in England.

Authors:  T Freeman; K Walshe
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-10

3.  The double edged sword of performance measurement.

Authors:  Kenneth W Kizer; Susan R Kirsh
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Assessing the acceptability of quality indicators and linkages to payment in primary care in nova scotia.

Authors:  Fred Burge; Beverley Lawson; Wayne Putnam
Journal:  Healthc Policy       Date:  2011-05

5.  GP perceptions of appraisal: professional development, performance management, or both?

Authors:  Oliver Boylan; Terry Bradley; Agnes McKnight
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Gauging to gain: primary care performance measurement.

Authors:  Sharon Johnston; Simone Dahrouge; William Hogg
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 7.  Improving measurement of primary care system performance.

Authors:  William Hogg; Elizabeth Dyke
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.275

8.  Cancer of the head and neck: a set of indicators based on register and administrative data.

Authors:  A Andreano; M Ansarin; D Alterio; R Bruschini; M G Valsecchi; A G Russo
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 2.124

9.  Understanding uptake of continuous quality improvement in Indigenous primary health care: lessons from a multi-site case study of the Audit and Best Practice for Chronic Disease project.

Authors:  Karen L Gardner; Michelle Dowden; Samantha Togni; Ross Bailie
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2010-03-13       Impact factor: 7.327

10.  Quality of care and health-related quality of life of climacteric stage women cared for in family medicine clinics in Mexico.

Authors:  Svetlana Vladislavovna Doubova Dubova; Sergio Flores-Hernández; Leticia Rodriguez-Aguilar; Ricardo Pérez-Cuevas
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.