Conformational constraint as a means for understanding RNA-aminoglycoside specificity.

The lack of high RNA target selectivity displayed by aminoglycoside antibiotics results from both their electrostatically driven binding mode and their conformational adaptability. The inherent flexibility around their glycosidic bonds allows them to easily assume a variety of conformations, permitting them to structurally adapt to diverse RNA targets. This structural promiscuity results in the formation of aminoglycoside complexes with diverse RNA targets in which the antibiotics assume distinct conformations. Such differences suggest that covalently linking individual rings in an aminoglycoside could reduce its available conformations, thereby altering target selectivity. To explore this possibility, conformationally constrained neomycin and paromomycin analogues designed to mimic the A-site bound aminoglycoside structure have been synthesized and their affinities to the TAR and A-site, two therapeutically relevant RNA targets, have been evaluated. As per design, this constraint has minimal deleterious effect on binding to the A-site. Surprisingly, however, preorganizing these neomycin-class antibiotics into a TAR-disfavored structure has no deleterious effect on binding to this HIV-1 RNA sequence. We rationalize these observations by suggesting that the A-site and HIV TAR possess inherently different selectivities toward aminoglycosides. The inherent plasticity of the TAR RNA, coupled to the remaining flexibility within the conformationally constrained analogues, makes this RNA site an accommodating target for such polycationic ligands. In contrast, the deeply encapsulating A-site is a more discriminating RNA target. These observations suggest that future design of novel target selective RNA-based therapeutics will have to consider the inherent "structural" selectivity of the RNA target and not only the selectivity patterns displayed by the low molecular weight ligands.