Literature DB >> 15995422

Outcome instruments for patellofemoral arthroplasty.

Elizabeth W Paxton1, Donald C Fithian.   

Abstract

Although there are numerous patient outcome instruments available, the most reliable and valid instruments for evaluating patient outcomes after patellofemoral arthroplasty have not been identified. In this article, we review and evaluate the psychometric properties and practical considerations of administering general health instruments (Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Short Form-36 and Short Form-12), knee scales (Knee Society Clinical Rating System, Knee Outcome Survey, International Knee Documentation Committee form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) and a disease specific scale (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) for patellofemoral arthroplasty outcome assessment. Based on our review of the literature, we recommend the Short Form-36 and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for evaluation of patellofemoral arthroplasty outcomes and provide recommendations for implementation of these instruments in a clinical setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15995422     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000171544.38095.77

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  6 in total

Review 1.  Patellofemoral arthroplasty, where are we today?

Authors:  Sébastien Lustig; Robert A Magnussen; Diane L Dahm; David Parker
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Isolated patellofemoral osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Hans-Peter W van Jonbergen; Rudolf W Poolman; Albert van Kampen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.717

3.  Influence of the anterior notch in mobile-bearing UKA on patellofemoral radiotracer uptake and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Dietmar Dammerer; Michael Liebensteiner; Hannes Rochau; Christian Uprimny; Vinzenz Smekal; Ralf Rosenberger; Elvire Servien
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 4.  Measures of knee function: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADL), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Activity Rating Scale (ARS), and Tegner Activity Score (TAS).

Authors:  Natalie J Collins; Devyani Misra; David T Felson; Kay M Crossley; Ewa M Roos
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.794

5.  No bias for developer publications and no difference between first-generation trochlear-resurfacing versus trochlear-cutting implants in 15,306 cases of patellofemoral joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Birgit Reihs; Florian Reihs; Gerold Labek; Markus Hochegger; Andreas Leithner; Nikolaus Böhler; Patrick Sadoghi
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Conversion of patellofemoral arthroplasty to total knee arthroplasty: A matched case-control study of 13 patients.

Authors:  Hans-Peter W van Jonbergen; Dirk M Werkman; Albert van Kampen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.717

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.