Literature DB >> 15993830

Effects of stimulus-stimulus compatibility and stimulus-response compatibility on response inhibition.

Frederick Verbruggen1, Baptist Liefooghe, Wim Notebaert, André Vandierendonck.   

Abstract

Previous studies demonstrated that interference control in stimulus-stimulus compatibility tasks slowed down stopping in the stop signal task (e.g., Kramer, A. F., Humphrey, D. G., Larish, J. F., Logan, G. D., & Strayer, D. L. (1994). Aging and inhibition: beyond a unitary view of inhibitory processing in attention. psychology and aging, 9, 491-512). In the present study, the impact of stimulus-stimulus compatibility and stimulus-response compatibility on response inhibition is further investigated. In Experiment 1, the stop signal task was combined with a traditional horizontal Simon task and with a vertical variant. For both dimensions, stopping responses was prolonged in incompatible trials, but only when the previous trial was compatible. In Experiment 2, the Simon task was combined with a spatial Stroop task in order to compare the effects of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response compatibility. The results demonstrated that both types of compatibility influenced stopping in a similar way. These findings are in favor of the hypothesis that response inhibition in the stop signal task and interference control in conflict tasks rely on similar mechanisms.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15993830     DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.05.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)        ISSN: 0001-6918


  27 in total

1.  Somatosensory effects of action inhibition: a study with the stop-signal paradigm.

Authors:  Eamonn Walsh; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 20.229

3.  Investigating the role of conflict resolution in memory updating by means of the one-back choice RT task.

Authors:  Arnaud Szmalec; Jelle Demanet; André Vandierendonck; Frederick Verbruggen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-04-24

4.  Post-conflict slowing after incongruent stimuli: from general to conflict-specific.

Authors:  Alodie Rey-Mermet; Beat Meier
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-03-28

5.  Strategic down-regulation of attentional resources as a mechanism of proactive response inhibition.

Authors:  Zachary D Langford; Ruth M Krebs; Durk Talsma; Marty G Woldorff; C N Boehler
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.386

6.  Visual selection and response selection without effector selection in tasks with circular arrays.

Authors:  Robert W Proctor; Alice F Healy
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-02       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  Attentional bias on motor control: is motor inhibition influenced by attentional reorienting?

Authors:  Pauline M Hilt; Pasquale Cardellicchio
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2018-03-08

8.  Carving executive control at its joints: Working memory capacity predicts stimulus-stimulus, but not stimulus-response, conflict.

Authors:  Matt E Meier; Michael J Kane
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 9.  Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms.

Authors:  Frederick Verbruggen; Gordon D Logan
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  The neural basis of cognitive control: response selection and inhibition.

Authors:  Vina M Goghari; Angus W MacDonald
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 2.310

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.