Literature DB >> 15988809

Cortical margining capabilities of fins associated with ventral cervical spine instrumentation.

Byung Ho Jin1, Heum Dai Kwon, Yong Eun Cho.   

Abstract

Fins incorporated into the design of a dynamic cervical spine implant have been employed to enhance axial load- bearing ability, yet their true biomechanical advantages, if any, have not been defined. Therefore, the goal of this study was to assess the biomechanical and axial load-bearing contributions of the fin components of the DOC ventral cervical stabilization system. Eighteen fresh cadaveric thoracic vertebrae (T1-T3) were obtained. Three test conditions were devised and studied: Condition A (DOC implants with fins were placed against the superior endplate and bone screws were not inserted); Condition B (DOC implant without fins was placed and bone screws were inserted); and Condition C (DOC implant with fins were placed against the superior endplate and bone screws were inserted). Specimens were tested by applying a pure axial compressive load to the superior platform of the DOC construct, and load-displacement data were collected. Condition C specimens had the greatest stiffness (459 +/- 80 N/mm) and yield load (526 +/- 168 N). Condition A specimens were the least stiff (266 +/- 53 N/mm), and had the smallest yield loads (180 +/- 54 N). The yield load of condition A plus condition B was approximately equal to that of condition C, with condition A contributing about one-third and condition B contributing two-thirds of the overall load-bearing capacity. Although the screws alone contributed to a substantial portion of axial load-bearing ability, the addition of the fins further increased load-bearing capabilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15988809      PMCID: PMC2815814          DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2005.46.3.372

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Yonsei Med J        ISSN: 0513-5796            Impact factor:   2.759


  22 in total

1.  The effect of locking fixation screws on the stability of anterior cervical plating.

Authors:  J M Spivak; D Chen; F J Kummer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Dynamic cervical plates: biomechanical evaluation of load sharing and stiffness.

Authors:  D S Brodke; S Gollogly; R Alexander Mohr; B K Nguyen; A T Dailey
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Fracture risk: a role for compact bone.

Authors:  R B Mazess
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 4.333

4.  The effects of rigid spinal instrumentation and solid bony fusion on spinal kinematics. A posterolateral spinal arthrodesis model.

Authors:  M Kanayama; B W Cunningham; J C Weis; L M Parker; K Kaneda; P C McAfee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Load sharing between the shell and centrum in the lumbar vertebral body.

Authors:  M J Silva; T M Keaveny; W C Hayes
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Cervical stabilization by plate and bone fusion.

Authors:  J A Brown; P Havel; N Ebraheim; S H Greenblatt; W T Jackson
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The relative contribution of trabecular and cortical bone to the strength of human lumbar vertebrae.

Authors:  S D Rockoff; E Sweet; J Bleustein
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Res       Date:  1969

8.  The outcome of pseudarthrosis after cervical anterior fusion.

Authors:  M Newman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.468

9.  Direct and computed tomography thickness measurements of the human, lumbar vertebral shell and endplate.

Authors:  M J Silva; C Wang; T M Keaveny; W C Hayes
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Correlation between the compressive strength of iliac and vertebral trabecular bone in normal individuals.

Authors:  L Mosekilde; A Viidik; L Mosekilde
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  1 in total

1.  Retraction: cortical margining capabilities of fins associated with ventral cervical spine instrumentation.

Authors:  Byung-Ho Jin
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2006-04-30       Impact factor: 2.759

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.