Literature DB >> 9122793

Load sharing between the shell and centrum in the lumbar vertebral body.

M J Silva1, T M Keaveny, W C Hayes.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A finite element parametric analysis to investigate the relative load carrying roles of the shell and centrum in the lumbar vertebral body.
OBJECTIVE: To address the issue of the structural role of the vertebral shell and clarify some of the contradictions raised by previous studies. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: A number of experimental and finite element studies have attempted to quantify the relative structural roles of the shell and centrum, but these studies support no consensus on the relative contribution of the shell to vertebral body strength.
METHODS: The authors developed finite element models to predict the fraction of the total compressive force acting on the lumbar vertebral body that is carried by the shell. Parametric variations were investigated to determine how the fraction of shell force was affected by changes in shell thickness, shell and centrum modulus, centrum anistropy, and loading conditions.
RESULTS: The fraction of compressive force carried by the shell increased from approximately 0 at the endplate to approximately 0.2 at the mid-transverse plane for a typical case. The shell force was highly sensitive to the degree of anisotropy of the trabecular centrum but was relatively insensitive to changes in shell thickness and the ratio of shell-to-centrum elastic modulus.
CONCLUSIONS: The conflicting conclusions of previous studies about the structural roles of the vertebral shell and centrum can be explained by differences in their methods. Our findings support the claims that the shell accounts for only approximately 10% of vertebral strength in vivo and that the trabecular centrum is the dominant structural component of the vertebral body.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9122793     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199701150-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  40 in total

1.  The importance of the endplate for interbody cages in the lumbar spine.

Authors:  Anne Polikeit; Stephen J Ferguson; Lutz P Nolte; Tracy E Orr
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  [Stress levels in bones and bone cement in the thoracolumbar spine afer kyphoplasty. Finite element study].

Authors:  L M Villarraga Ph D; P A Cripton; A J Bellezza; U Berlemann; S M Kurtz; A A Edidin
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Factors influencing stresses in the lumbar spine after the insertion of intervertebral cages: finite element analysis.

Authors:  Anne Polikeit; Stephen J Ferguson; Lutz P Nolte; Tracy E Orr
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2002-12-19       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Overview of osteoporosis: pathophysiology and determinants of bone strength.

Authors:  Christopher M Bono; Thomas A Einhorn
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-09-12       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Biomechanical evaluation of the Total Facet Arthroplasty System® (TFAS®): loading as compared to a rigid posterior instrumentation system.

Authors:  Simon G Sjovold; Qingan Zhu; Anton Bowden; Chad R Larson; Peter M de Bakker; Marta L Villarraga; Jorge A Ochoa; David M Rosler; Peter A Cripton
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Calibration of the mechanical properties in a finite element model of a lumbar vertebra under dynamic compression up to failure.

Authors:  Anaïs Garo; Pierre Jean Arnoux; Eric Wagnac; Carl Eric Aubin
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 2.602

7.  Quantification of the roles of trabecular microarchitecture and trabecular type in determining the elastic modulus of human trabecular bone.

Authors:  Xiaowei S Liu; Paul Sajda; Punam K Saha; Felix W Wehrli; X Edward Guo
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Effect of specimen-specific anisotropic material properties in quantitative computed tomography-based finite element analysis of the vertebra.

Authors:  Ginu U Unnikrishnan; Glenn D Barest; David B Berry; Amira I Hussein; Elise F Morgan
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 2.097

9.  Comparison of quantitative computed tomography-based measures in predicting vertebral compressive strength.

Authors:  Jenni M Buckley; Kenneth Loo; Julie Motherway
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2006-12-15       Impact factor: 4.398

10.  Compressive axial mechanical properties of rat bone as functions of bone volume fraction, apparent density and micro-ct based mineral density.

Authors:  Esther Cory; Ara Nazarian; Vahid Entezari; Vartan Vartanians; Ralph Müller; Brian D Snyder
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2009-12-08       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.