Literature DB >> 10642425

Two-stage global search designs for linkage analysis II: including discordant relative pairs in the study.

X Guo1, R C Elston.   

Abstract

The optimal two-stage designs proposed by Elston [1992, 1994] for a global search of the genome to locate disease genes by linkage analysis typically halve the cost of a study compared to one-stage designs [Elston et al., 1996]. These designs were based on sampling affected pairs of relatives. Usually, using affected relative pairs is more powerful than using discordant relative pairs [Blackwelder and Elston, 1985; Risch 1990b]. However, in certain situations discordant relative pairs can be as powerful as, or even more powerful than, affected relative pairs. In addition, combining discordant pairs with affected pairs provides a control study. In this paper, we investigate optimal two-stage designs when: 1) using only discordant relative pairs, and 2) combining discordant with affected relative pairs. We show that including discordant relatives pairs into the study not only provides a control, but is also cost effective. Copyright 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10642425     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2272(200002)18:2<111::AID-GEPI2>3.0.CO;2-M

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Epidemiol        ISSN: 0741-0395            Impact factor:   2.135


  8 in total

1.  A novel framework for sib pair linkage analysis.

Authors:  G David Poznik; Katarzyna Adamska; Xin Xu; Andrzej S Krolewski; John J Rogus
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-12-08       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Weighting affected sib pairs by marker informativity.

Authors:  Daniel Franke; Andreas Ziegler
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Program update and novel use of the DESPAIR program to design a genome-wide linkage study using relative pairs.

Authors:  Heather M Ochs-Balcom; Xiuqing Guo; Takashi Yonebayashi; Georgia Wiesner; Robert C Elston
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 0.444

4.  Modifier gene study of meconium ileus in cystic fibrosis: statistical considerations and gene mapping results.

Authors:  Ruslan Dorfman; Weili Li; Lei Sun; Fan Lin; Yongqian Wang; Andrew Sandford; Peter D Paré; Karen McKay; Hana Kayserova; Tereza Piskackova; Milan Macek; Kamila Czerska; Dorota Sands; Harm Tiddens; Sonia Margarit; Gabriela Repetto; Marci K Sontag; Frank J Accurso; Scott Blackman; Garry R Cutting; Lap-Chee Tsui; Mary Corey; Peter Durie; Julian Zielenski; Lisa J Strug
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 4.132

5.  Germline mutations in MSR1, ASCC1, and CTHRC1 in patients with Barrett esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Mohammed Orloff; Charissa Peterson; Xin He; Shireen Ganapathi; Brandie Heald; Yi-ran Yang; Gurkan Bebek; Todd Romigh; Jee Hoon Song; Wenjing Wu; Stefan David; Yulan Cheng; Stephen J Meltzer; Charis Eng
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 6.  Toward a better understanding of ADHD: LPHN3 gene variants and the susceptibility to develop ADHD.

Authors:  Mauricio Arcos-Burgos; Maximilian Muenke
Journal:  Atten Defic Hyperact Disord       Date:  2010-10-16

7.  Search for intracranial aneurysm susceptibility gene(s) using Finnish families.

Authors:  Jane M Olson; Sompong Vongpunsawad; Helena Kuivaniemi; Antti Ronkainen; Juha Hernesniemi; Markku Ryynänen; Lee-Lian Kim; Gerard Tromp
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 2.103

8.  Design considerations in a sib-pair study of linkage for susceptibility loci in cancer.

Authors:  Richard A Kerber; Christopher I Amos; Beow Y Yeap; Dianne M Finkelstein; Duncan C Thomas
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 2.103

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.