Literature DB >> 9883537

Multipoint linkage analysis using affected relative pairs and partially informative markers.

J Teng1, D Siegmund.   

Abstract

Linkage analysis is a method of identifying regions of the human genome harboring genes affecting the risk for a particular disease. It works by finding chromosomal segments inherited by affected relatives from a common ancestor (i.e., identical by descent or IBD) in excess of that expected by chance. Two complicating factors are that only a relatively small number of genomic locations (marker loci) are examined and the number of distinct realizations (alleles) at each marker is not large. Hence, unambiguous determination of IBD is impossible for any genomic location without additional information. Assuming data from a set of mapped, partially informative markers, we evaluate the effectiveness of a method that analyzes the array of markers on each chromosome jointly (multipoint methods) as a function of the informativeness and density of the markers. For the special case of pairs of half siblings whose parents are also typed, a combination of analysis and simulation is used to obtain insight into the problem of setting thresholds to control the false-positive error rate. Approximations are given for the power, and guidelines are developed to help describe the trade-offs between marker density and informativeness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9883537

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  8 in total

1.  On a randomization procedure in linkage analysis.

Authors:  H Zhao; K R Merikangas; K K Kidd
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  Relationship estimation by Markov-process models in a sib-pair linkage study.

Authors:  J M Olson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  On a randomization procedure.

Authors:  A Kong; D L Nicolae
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Upward bias in estimation of genetic effects.

Authors:  D Siegmund
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-10-17       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  "Bias toward the null" means reduced power.

Authors:  Solveig K Sieberts; Karl W Broman; Daniel F Gudbjartsson
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Weighting affected sib pairs by marker informativity.

Authors:  Daniel Franke; Andreas Ziegler
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Significant linkage on chromosome 10p in families with bulimia nervosa.

Authors:  Cynthia M Bulik; B Devlin; Silviu-Alin Bacanu; Laura Thornton; Kelly L Klump; Manfred M Fichter; Katherine A Halmi; Allan S Kaplan; Michael Strober; D Blake Woodside; Andrew W Bergen; J Kelly Ganjei; Scott Crow; James Mitchell; Alessandro Rotondo; Mauro Mauri; Giovanni Cassano; Pamela Keel; Wade H Berrettini; Walter H Kaye
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2002-12-10       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Searching for epistasis and linkage heterogeneity by correlations of pedigree-specific linkage scores.

Authors:  Daniel J Schaid; Shannon K McDonnell; Erin E Carlson; Stephen N Thibodeau; Janet L Stanford; Elaine A Ostrander
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.135

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.