Literature DB >> 15982812

Use of a novel thermal operant behavioral assay for characterization of orofacial pain sensitivity.

John K Neubert1, Charles G Widmer, Wendi Malphurs, Heather L Rossi, Charles J Vierck, Robert M Caudle.   

Abstract

Orofacial pain has been well-characterized clinically, but evaluation of orofacial pain in animals has not kept pace. The objective of this study was to describe behavioral responses to facial thermal stimulation and inflammation with/without an analgesic using a novel operant paradigm. Animals were trained to voluntarily place their face against a stimulus thermode (37.7-57.2 degrees C) providing access to positive reinforcement. These contingencies present a conflict between positive reward and tolerance for nociceptive stimulation. Inflammation was induced and morphine was provided as an analgesic in a subset of animals. Six outcome measures were determined: reward intake, reward licking contacts, stimulus facial contacts, facial contact duration, ratio of reward/stimulus contacts, and ratio of facial contact duration/event. Animals displayed aversive behaviors to the higher temperatures, denoted by a significant decrease in reward intake, total facial contact duration, and reward licking events. The number of facial contacts increased with increasing temperature, replacing long drinking bouts with more frequent short drinks, as reflected by a low ratio of facial contact duration/event. The number of reward licking/facial contact events was significantly decreased as the thermal stimulus intensity increased, providing another pain index derived from this operant method. These outcomes were significantly affected in the direction of increased nociception following inflammation, and these indices of hyperalgesia were reversed with morphine administration. These data reflect an orofacial pain behavior profile that was based on an animal's responses in an operant escape paradigm. This technique allows evaluation of nociceptive processing and modulation throughout the neuraxis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15982812     DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.05.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  70 in total

1.  Comparison of rat sensory behavioral tasks to detect somatosensory morbidity after diffuse brain-injury.

Authors:  Annastazia Ellouise Learoyd; Jonathan Lifshitz
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Morphine and MK-801 administration leads to alternative N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor 1 splicing and associated changes in reward seeking behavior and nociception on an operant orofacial assay.

Authors:  E M Anderson; A Y Del Valle-Pinero; S K Suckow; T A Nolan; J K Neubert; R M Caudle
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Adaptation of a novel operant orofacial testing system to characterize both mechanical and thermal pain.

Authors:  Todd A Nolan; Jordan Hester; Yvonne Bokrand-Donatelli; Robert M Caudle; John K Neubert
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-10-23       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Effects of environmental enrichment on thermal sensitivity in an operant orofacial pain assay.

Authors:  Heather L Rossi; John K Neubert
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Pain control through selective chemo-axotomy of centrally projecting TRPV1+ sensory neurons.

Authors:  Matthew R Sapio; John K Neubert; Danielle M LaPaglia; Dragan Maric; Jason M Keller; Stephen J Raithel; Eric L Rohrs; Ethan M Anderson; John A Butman; Robert M Caudle; Dorothy C Brown; John D Heiss; Andrew J Mannes; Michael J Iadarola
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 6.  From blast to bench: A translational mini-review of posttraumatic headache.

Authors:  Laura S Moye; Amynah A Pradhan
Journal:  J Neurosci Res       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 4.164

7.  [Characteristics of orofacial operant test for orofacial pain sensitivity caused by occlusal interference in rats].

Authors:  S S Bai; S Y Mo; X X Xu; Y Liu; Q F Xie; Y Cao
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2020-02-18

8.  Thermosensitive transient receptor potential (TRP) channel agonists and their role in mechanical, thermal and nociceptive sensations as assessed using animal models.

Authors:  A H Klein; Minh Trannyguen; Christopher L Joe; Carstens M Iodi; E Carstens
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.833

Review 9.  Evaluation of reward from pain relief.

Authors:  Edita Navratilova; Jennifer Yanhua Xie; Tamara King; Frank Porreca
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 5.691

10.  Characterization of bilateral trigeminal constriction injury using an operant facial pain assay.

Authors:  H L Rossi; A C Jenkins; J Kaufman; I Bhattacharyya; R M Caudle; J K Neubert
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 3.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.