Literature DB >> 21939691

Comparison of rat sensory behavioral tasks to detect somatosensory morbidity after diffuse brain-injury.

Annastazia Ellouise Learoyd1, Jonathan Lifshitz.   

Abstract

Brain injury disrupts neuronal circuits, impacting neurological function. Selective and sensitive behavioral tests are required to explore neurological dysfunction, recovery and potential therapy. Previously we reported that the Whisker Nuisance Task (WNT), where whiskers are manually stimulated in an open field, shows sensory sensitivity in diffuse brain-injured rats. To further explore this somatosensory morbidity, we evaluated three additional whisker-dependent tasks: Gap Cross Test, a novel Angle Entrance Task and Whisker Guided Exploration Task. Brain-injured (n=11) and sham (n=8) rats were tested before midline fluid percussion brain injury (moderate: 2.0atm) and 1 and 4 weeks after injury. For the WNT, we confirmed that brain-injured rats develop significant sensory sensitivity to whisker stimulation over 28 days. In the Gap Cross Test, where rats cross progressively larger elevated gaps, we found that animals were inconsistent in crossable distance regardless of injury. In the Angle Entrance Task, where rats enter 30°, 40°, 50° or 80° corners, rats performed consistently regardless of injury. In the Whisker Guided Exploration Task, where rats voluntarily explore an oval circuit, we identified significant decreases in the number of rears and reversals and changes in the predominant location (injured rats spend more time in the inside of the turn compared to the outside) after injury and increased thigmotaxis after sham and brain-injury. Both the WNT and Whisker Guided Exploration Task show injury-induced somatosensory behavioral morbidity; however, the WNT remains more sensitive in detecting brain injury, possibly due to imposed whisker stimulation that elicits agitation similar to the human condition.
Copyright © 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21939691      PMCID: PMC3270820          DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2011.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Res        ISSN: 0166-4328            Impact factor:   3.332


  40 in total

1.  Whiskers, barrels, and cortical efferent pathways in gap crossing by rats.

Authors:  E W Jenkinson; M Glickstein
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Comparison of patients with and without emotional/behavioral deterioration during the first year after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  T W Dunlop; G B Udvarhelyi; A F Stedem; J M O'Connor; M L Isaacs; J G Puig; J H Mather
Journal:  J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.198

3.  Predicting sensorimotor and memory deficits after neonatal ischemic stroke with reperfusion in the rat.

Authors:  Valentine Bouet; Thomas Freret; Steve Ankri; Madeleine Bezault; Sylvain Renolleau; Michel Boulouard; Etienne Jacotot; David Chauvier; Pascale Schumann-Bard
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-27       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Rats can learn a roughness discrimination using only their vibrissal system.

Authors:  E Guić-Robles; C Valdivieso; G Guajardo
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1989-01-01       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Behavioral properties of the trigeminal somatosensory system in rats performing whisker-dependent tactile discriminations.

Authors:  D J Krupa; M S Matell; A J Brisben; L M Oliveira; M A Nicolelis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-08-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Traumatic brain injury and its effects on synaptic plasticity.

Authors:  Benedict C Albensi; Damir Janigro
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.311

7.  Symptoms at one year following concussion from minor head injuries.

Authors:  W H Rutherford; J D Merrett; J R McDonald
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1979-02       Impact factor: 2.586

8.  Role of vibrissae for depth perception in the rat (Rattus norvegicus).

Authors:  H R Schiffman; R Lore; J Passafiume; R Neeb
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 2.844

Review 9.  Cellular and subcellular change evoked by diffuse traumatic brain injury: a complex web of change extending far beyond focal damage.

Authors:  Orsolya Farkas; John T Povlishock
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.453

10.  Texture discrimination and unit recordings in the rat whisker/barrel system.

Authors:  Thomas Prigg; Daniel Goldreich; George E Carvell; Daniel J Simons
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2002-12
View more
  15 in total

1.  Does time heal all wounds? Experimental diffuse traumatic brain injury results in persisting histopathology in the thalamus.

Authors:  Theresa Currier Thomas; Sarah B Ogle; Benjamin M Rumney; Hazel G May; P David Adelson; Jonathan Lifshitz
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 2.  Clinical relevance of midline fluid percussion brain injury: Acute deficits, chronic morbidities and the utility of biomarkers.

Authors:  Jonathan Lifshitz; Rachel K Rowe; Daniel R Griffiths; Megan N Evilsizor; Theresa C Thomas; P David Adelson; Tracy K McIntosh
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Morphological and genetic activation of microglia after diffuse traumatic brain injury in the rat.

Authors:  T Cao; T C Thomas; J M Ziebell; J R Pauly; J Lifshitz
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 3.590

Review 4.  Mild traumatic brain injury in translation.

Authors:  Harvey S Levin; Claudia S Robertson
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 5.269

Review 5.  Traumatic brain injury using mouse models.

Authors:  Yi Ping Zhang; Jun Cai; Lisa B E Shields; Naikui Liu; Xiao-Ming Xu; Christopher B Shields
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 6.829

6.  Experimental diffuse brain injury results in regional alteration of gross vascular morphology independent of neuropathology.

Authors:  Jenna M Ziebell; Rachel K Rowe; Jordan L Harrison; Katharine C Eakin; Taylor Colburn; F Anthony Willyerd; Jonathan Lifshitz
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 7.  Microglia: dismantling and rebuilding circuits after acute neurological injury.

Authors:  Jenna M Ziebell; P David Adelson; Jonathan Lifshitz
Journal:  Metab Brain Dis       Date:  2014-04-15       Impact factor: 3.584

8.  Aberrant Somatosensory Processing and Connectivity in Mice Lacking Engrailed-2.

Authors:  Gabriele Chelini; Valerio Zerbi; Luca Cimino; Andrea Grigoli; Marija Markicevic; Francesco Libera; Sergio Robbiati; Mattia Gadler; Silvia Bronzoni; Silvia Miorelli; Alberto Galbusera; Alessandro Gozzi; Simona Casarosa; Giovanni Provenzano; Yuri Bozzi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Cortical hypoexcitation defines neuronal responses in the immediate aftermath of traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Victoria Philippa Anne Johnstone; Edwin Bingbing Yan; Dasuni Sathsara Alwis; Ramesh Rajan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Spatial Distribution of Neuropathology and Neuroinflammation Elucidate the Biomechanics of Fluid Percussion Injury.

Authors:  Joshua A Beitchman; Jonathan Lifshitz; Neil G Harris; Theresa Currier Thomas; Audrey D Lafrenaye; Anders Hånell; C Edward Dixon; John T Povlishock; Rachel K Rowe
Journal:  Neurotrauma Rep       Date:  2021-02-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.