Literature DB >> 15982231

Patch test reactions to cosmetic allergens in 1995-1997 and 2000-2002 in Finland--a multicentre study.

T Hasan1, T Rantanen, K Alanko, R J Harvima, R Jolanki, K Kalimo, A Lahti, K Lammintausta, A I Lauerma, A Laukkanen, T Luukkaala, R Riekki, K Turjanmaa, E Varjonen, A-M Vuorela.   

Abstract

Contact sensitivity to cosmetics is common, but the sensitizing chemicals vary between countries and study periods. The present survey aimed at revealing the recent trends in patch test sensitivity with cosmetic chemicals in Finland. We report a retrospective multicentre survey of patch test reactions focusing on cosmetic-related substances and comparing the test results in 1995-97 with those in 2000-02. The most striking increases in the frequency of the patch test sensitivity were found with balsam of Peru and propolis from 4.0% to 6.2% (P < 0.001) and from 0.5% to 1.4% (P < 0.001), respectively, whereas the most prominent decreases were found with methylchloro/methylisothiazolinone and chlorhexidine diglugonate from 2.4% to 1.3% (P < 0.001) and from 1.2% to 0.5% (P < 0.001), respectively. The level of patch test sensitivity to methyldibromo glutaronitrile increased, although not significantly, from 1.0% to 1.5%. An increasing tendency was also found with hair dye chemicals 4-aminophenol and toluene-2,5-diamine or toluene-2,5-diamine sulfate from 1.3% to 3.8% and from 1.4% to 5.2%, respectively, while such a tendency was not found among permanent wave chemicals. The sensitivity level of fragrance mix remained the same (6% - 7%). We conclude that surveys revealing the state of sensitivity to cosmetic chemicals should be performed periodically in different countries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15982231     DOI: 10.1111/j.0105-1873.2005.00630.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contact Dermatitis        ISSN: 0105-1873            Impact factor:   6.600


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of Marketed Cosmetic Products Constituents with the Antigens Included in Cosmetic-related Patch Test.

Authors:  Seung Hyun Cheong; You Won Choi; Ki Bum Myung; Hae Young Choi
Journal:  Ann Dermatol       Date:  2010-08-05       Impact factor: 1.444

Review 2.  Skin Toxicity of Selected Hair Cosmetic Ingredients: A Review Focusing on Hairdressers.

Authors:  Cara Symanzik; Patricia Weinert; Željka Babić; Sarah Hallmann; Martin Stibius Havmose; Jeanne Duus Johansen; Sanja Kezic; Marija Macan; Jelena Macan; Julia Strahwald; Rajka Turk; Henk F van der Molen; Swen Malte John; Wolfgang Uter
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 4.614

3.  Hair dye use and prostate cancer risk: A prospective analysis in the Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene Cancer Prevention Study cohort.

Authors:  Jung-Eun Lim; Jiaqi Huang; Satu Mӓnnistӧ; Stephanie J Weinstein; Demetrius Albanes
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 6.921

4.  Adverse cutaneous reactions to skin care products on the face vary with age, but not with sex.

Authors:  Li-Ning Huang; Yi-Ping Zhong; Dan Liu; Xiao-Hua Wang; Can-Yi Gong; Si Wen; Peter M Elias; Bin Yang; Mao-Qiang Man
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2018-09-12       Impact factor: 6.600

5.  Propolis and allergic reactions.

Authors:  Nandini D Basavaiah; Deepak B Suryakanth
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2012-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.