Literature DB >> 20711261

Comparison of Marketed Cosmetic Products Constituents with the Antigens Included in Cosmetic-related Patch Test.

Seung Hyun Cheong1, You Won Choi, Ki Bum Myung, Hae Young Choi.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Currently, cosmetic series (Chemotechnique Diagnostics, Sweden) is the most widely used cosmetic-related patch test in Korea. However, no studies have been conducted on how accurately it reflects the constituents of the cosmetics in Korea.
OBJECTIVE: We surveyed the constituents of various cosmetics and compare with the cosmetic series, to investigate whether it is accurate in determining allergic contact dermatitis caused by cosmetics sold in Korea.
METHODS: Cosmetics were classified into 11 categories and the survey was conducted on the constituents of 55 cosmetics, with 5 cosmetics in each category. The surveyed constituents were classified by chemical function and compared with the antigens of cosmetic series.
RESULTS: 155 constituents were found in 55 cosmetics, and 74 (47.7%) of constituents were included as antigen. Among them, only 20 constituents (27.0%) were included in cosmetic series. A significant number of constituents, such as fragrance, vehicle and surfactant were not included. Only 41.7% of antigens in cosmetic series were found to be in the cosmetics sampled.
CONCLUSION: The constituents not included in the patch test but possess antigenicity are widely used in cosmetics. Therefore, the patch test should be modified to reflect ingredients in the marketed products that may stimulate allergies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allergic contact dermatitis; Cosmetic products; Cosmetics; Ingredients; Patch test

Year:  2010        PMID: 20711261      PMCID: PMC2917678          DOI: 10.5021/ad.2010.22.3.262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Dermatol        ISSN: 1013-9087            Impact factor:   1.444


  36 in total

1.  A primer on cosmetics. AAD Advisory Board, CTFA Task Force on Cosmetics.

Authors:  W G Larsen; E M Jackson; M O Barker; R M Bednarz; P G Engasser; M N O'Donoghue; J S Strauss
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 11.527

2.  Allergic cheilitis due to castor oil in lipsticks.

Authors:  A A Fisher
Journal:  Cutis       Date:  1991-06

3.  Contact allergy to cosmetics: causative ingredients.

Authors:  A C de Groot
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 6.600

4.  Allergy to ingredients of vehicles.

Authors:  M Hannuksela; M Kousa; V Pirilä
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1976-04       Impact factor: 6.600

5.  The allergens in cosmetics.

Authors:  A C de Groot; D P Bruynzeel; J D Bos; H L van der Meeren; T van Joost; B A Jagtman; J W Weyland
Journal:  Arch Dermatol       Date:  1988-10

6.  Clinical relevance of positive patch test reactions to the 26 EU-labelled fragrances.

Authors:  Eleonoor J van Oosten; Marie-Louise A Schuttelaar; Pieter Jan Coenraads
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 6.600

7.  Propolis allergy. (III). Sensitization studies with minor constituents.

Authors:  B M Hausen; E Wollenweber
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 8.  Cosmetics and contact dermatitis.

Authors:  P G Engasser
Journal:  Dermatol Clin       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 3.478

9.  Contact dermatitis from antioxidants.

Authors:  J Roed-Petersen; N Hjorth
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 9.302

10.  A five-year study of cosmetic reactions.

Authors:  R M Adams; H I Maibach
Journal:  J Am Acad Dermatol       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 11.527

View more
  1 in total

1.  Patch testing in suspected allergic contact dermatitis to cosmetics.

Authors:  Pramod Kumar; Rekha Paulose
Journal:  Dermatol Res Pract       Date:  2014-09-09
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.