Literature DB >> 15982128

Parafoveal semantic processing of emotional visual scenes.

Manuel G Calvo1, Peter J Lang.   

Abstract

The authors investigated whether emotional pictorial stimuli are especially likely to be processed in parafoveal vision. Pairs of emotional and neutral visual scenes were presented parafoveally (2.1 degrees or 2.5 degrees of visual angle from a central fixation point) for 150-3,000 ms, followed by an immediate recognition test (500-ms delay). Results indicated that (a) the first fixation was more likely to be placed onto the emotional than the neutral scene; (b) recognition sensitivity (A') was generally higher for the emotional than for the neutral scene when the scenes were paired, but there were no differences when presented individually; and (c) the superior sensitivity for emotional scenes survived changes in size, color, and spatial orientation, but not in meaning. The data suggest that semantic analysis of emotional scenes can begin in parafoveal vision in advance of foveal fixation. ((c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15982128     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.31.3.502

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  24 in total

1.  What does the dot-probe task measure? A reverse correlation analysis of electrocortical activity.

Authors:  Nina N Thigpen; L Forest Gruss; Steven Garcia; David R Herring; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Affective priming of emotional pictures in parafoveal vision: left visual field advantage.

Authors:  Manuel G Calvo; Pedro Avero
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Look-don't look! How emotional pictures affect pro- and anti-saccades.

Authors:  Johanna Kissler; Andreas Keil
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Lateralized discrimination of emotional scenes in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Manuel G Calvo; Sandra Rodríguez-Chinea; Andrés Fernández-Martín
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Asymmetry in Gaze Direction Discrimination Between the Upper and Lower Visual Fields.

Authors:  Adam Palanica; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 1.490

6.  Electrophysiological correlates of emotional face processing after mild traumatic brain injury in preschool children.

Authors:  Fabien D'Hondt; Maryse Lassonde; Fanny Thebault-Dagher; Annie Bernier; Jocelyn Gravel; Phetsamone Vannasing; Miriam H Beauchamp
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Emotional attention modulates microsaccadic rate and direction.

Authors:  Koji Kashihara; Kazuo Okanoya; Nobuyuki Kawai
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-03-28

8.  Effects of Peripheral Eccentricity and Head Orientation on Gaze Discrimination.

Authors:  Adam Palanica; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2014-01-01

9.  Recognition of facial expressions is influenced by emotional scene gist.

Authors:  Ruthger Righart; Beatrice de Gelder
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.282

10.  Eye movements when looking at unusual/weird scenes: are there cultural differences?

Authors:  Keith Rayner; Monica S Castelhano; Jinmian Yang
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.051

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.