Literature DB >> 25511169

Lateralized discrimination of emotional scenes in peripheral vision.

Manuel G Calvo1, Sandra Rodríguez-Chinea, Andrés Fernández-Martín.   

Abstract

This study investigates whether there is lateralized processing of emotional scenes in the visual periphery, in the absence of eye fixations; and whether this varies with emotional valence (pleasant vs. unpleasant), specific emotional scene content (babies, erotica, human attack, mutilation, etc.), and sex of the viewer. Pairs of emotional (positive or negative) and neutral photographs were presented for 150 ms peripherally (≥6.5° away from fixation). Observers judged on which side the emotional picture was located. Low-level image properties, scene visual saliency, and eye movements were controlled. Results showed that (a) correct identification of the emotional scene exceeded the chance level; (b) performance was more accurate and faster when the emotional scene appeared in the left than in the right visual field; (c) lateralization was equivalent for females and males for pleasant scenes, but was greater for females and unpleasant scenes; and (d) lateralization occurred similarly for different emotional scene categories. These findings reveal discrimination between emotional and neutral scenes, and right brain hemisphere dominance for emotional processing, which is modulated by sex of the viewer and scene valence, and suggest that coarse affective significance can be extracted in peripheral vision.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25511169     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-4174-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  42 in total

Review 1.  Unconscious processing of emotions and the right hemisphere.

Authors:  Guido Gainotti
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Quantifying facial expression recognition across viewing conditions.

Authors:  Deborah Goren; Hugh R Wilson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Peripheral vision and preferential emotion processing.

Authors:  Andrea De Cesarei; Maurizio Codispoti; Harald T Schupp
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2009-10-28       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  The time course of implicit affective picture processing: an eye movement study.

Authors:  Eugene McSorley; Carien M van Reekum
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2013-03-25

Review 5.  A review on sex differences in processing emotional signals.

Authors:  M E Kret; B De Gelder
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-01-08       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Parafoveal semantic processing of emotional visual scenes.

Authors:  Manuel G Calvo; Peter J Lang
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Lateralization of affective processing in the insula.

Authors:  Emma G Duerden; Marie Arsalidou; Minha Lee; Margot J Taylor
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2013-04-13       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Are there sex differences in ERPs related to processing empathy-evoking pictures?

Authors:  Y Groen; A A Wijers; O Tucha; M Althaus
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Emotional scene content drives the saccade generation system reflexively.

Authors:  Lauri Nummenmaa; Jukka Hyönä; Manuel G Calvo
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Emotional scenes elicit more pronounced self-reported emotional experience and greater EPN and LPP modulation when compared to emotional faces.

Authors:  Nathaniel Thom; Justin Knight; Rod Dishman; Dean Sabatinelli; Douglas C Johnson; Brett Clementz
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.526

View more
  3 in total

1.  Dynamic Reconfiguration of the Supplementary Motor Area Network during Imagined Music Performance.

Authors:  Shoji Tanaka; Eiji Kirino
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Positive affective priming decreases the middle late positive potential response to negative images.

Authors:  Lauren D Hill; Valerie G Starratt; Mercedes Fernandez; Jaime L Tartar
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 2.708

3.  Laterality in Responses to Acoustic Stimuli in Giant Pandas.

Authors:  He Liu; Yezhong Tang; Yanxia Ni; Guangzhan Fang
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 2.752

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.