Literature DB >> 15980998

A prospective randomized study comparing a cervical carbon fiber cage to the Smith-Robinson technique with allograft and plating: up to 24 months follow-up.

Stephen I Ryu1, Michelle Mitchell, Daniel H Kim.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Intervertebral carbon fiber cages may reduce graft collapse and promote bony fusion. Their safety and efficacy in the cervical spine have been investigated; however, no study has compared the outcomes of anterior cervical decompression and placement of a carbon fiber cage with placement of allograft and plate.
METHODS: Forty consecutive patients who met inclusion criteria were enrolled and randomized to anterior cervical discectomy with carbon fiber cage alone (n=20) or with allograft with plating (n=20). Clinical and radiographic evaluations were performed at baseline and at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months. Neck and arm pain as well as neck disability index (NDI) were assessed at every visit. The Short Form (SF)-36 was completed prior to operation and at 12-month intervals. Cervical radiographs were evaluated pre-op and at every follow-up for evidence of fusion and instability.
RESULTS: No significant difference was found between the two randomized groups with respect to pre-operative age (mean 50 years), sex, employment status, duration of pain or cervical levels affected. The mean follow-up period was 14 months (range, 6-26 months). The clinical pain and disability improvements were similar for both treatments. Post-operative donor site pain was only present in the cage group, but not of significant long-term disability. At up to 24 months, NDI scores were significantly improved in both groups when compared with baseline. At 12 and 24 months, all SF-36 questionnaire responses were also improved in both the treatment groups. However, there was no statistically significant difference in outcomes between the two groups at any time. The fusion rate was 100% in both groups by 12 and 24 months, without evidence of instability. There were no differences in complications between both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The outcomes after cervical decompression and placement of a carbon fiber cage appear to be similar to cervical decompression with allograft and plating by the Smith-Robinson technique.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15980998      PMCID: PMC3489408          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-0951-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  27 in total

1.  Anterior cervical instrumentation enhances fusion rates in multilevel reconstruction in smokers.

Authors:  B Bose
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  2001-02

2.  Height of cervical foramina after anterior discectomy and implantation of a carbon fiber cage.

Authors:  R H Bartels; R Donk; R D van Azn
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.115

3.  Cage versus tricortical graft for cervical interbody fusion. A prospective randomised study.

Authors:  A A Siddiqui; A Jackowski
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2003-09

4.  Anterior cervical interbody fusion using autogeneic and allogeneic bone graft substrate: a prospective comparative analysis.

Authors:  R C Bishop; K A Moore; M N Hadley
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Preliminary experience of carbon fibre cage prostheses for treatment of cervical spine disorders.

Authors:  N S Brooke; A W Rorke; A T King; R W Gullan
Journal:  Br J Neurosurg       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.596

6.  Posterior lumbar interbody fusion. A biomechanical comparison, including a new threaded cage.

Authors:  D S Brodke; J C Dick; D N Kunz; R McCabe; T A Zdeblick
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine interbody fusion cages.

Authors:  F Kandziora; R Pflugmacher; J Schäfer; C Born; G Duda; N P Haas; T Mittlmeier
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  A comparative analysis of fusion rates and donor-site morbidity for autogeneic rib and iliac crest bone grafts in posterior cervical fusions.

Authors:  P D Sawin; V C Traynelis; A H Menezes
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 5.115

9.  A prospective randomized multicenter clinical evaluation of an anterior cervical fusion cage.

Authors:  R J Hacker; J C Cauthen; T J Gilbert; S L Griffith
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  A prospective randomized comparison between the cloward procedure and a carbon fiber cage in the cervical spine: a clinical and radiologic study.

Authors:  Ludek Vavruch; Rune Hedlund; Davood Javid; Waclaw Leszniewski; Adel Shalabi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  11 in total

1.  Subsidence after anterior cervical inter-body fusion. A randomized prospective clinical trial.

Authors:  Erich Kast; Sharam Derakhshani; Matthias Bothmann; Joachim Oberle
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2008-09-17       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Evaluation of bony fusion after anterior cervical discectomy: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  I Noordhoek; M T Koning; C L A Vleggeert-Lankamp
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  A systematic review of comparative studies on bone graft alternatives for common spine fusion procedures.

Authors:  Charla R Fischer; Ryan Cassilly; Winifred Cantor; Emmanuel Edusei; Qusai Hammouri; Thomas Errico
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: review and update for radiologists.

Authors:  Kimia Khalatbari Kani; Felix S Chew
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Anterior surgical treatment of cervical spondylotic myelopathy: review article.

Authors:  John C Quinn; Paul D Kiely; Darren R Lebl; Alexander P Hughes
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2014-08-08

6.  Comparison of Operating Time between Stand-alone Cage and a Standard Method for a Single Level Cervical Disc Disease.

Authors:  Chang Hyoun Kim; Chi Heon Kim; Chun Kee Chung; Tae-Ahn Jahng
Journal:  Korean J Spine       Date:  2012-03-31

7.  Comparative Analysis of Interbody Cages Versus Tricortical Graft with Anterior Plate Fixation for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion in Degenerative Cervical Disc Disease.

Authors:  Pritish Singh; Ashok Kumar; Vishal Shekhawat
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-03-01

8.  Clinical and radiological comparison of femur and fibular allografts for the treatment of cervical degenerative disc diseases.

Authors:  Hyeong-Seok Oh; Chan Shik Shim; Jin-Sung Kim; Sang-Ho Lee
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2013-01-31

9.  Preliminary outcomes of allograft and hydroxyapatite as substitutes for autograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with self-locking standalone cages.

Authors:  Changsheng Yang; Wentao Zhuo; Qingchu Li; Caiqiang Huang; Huibo Yan; Dadi Jin
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-02-08       Impact factor: 2.359

10.  Clinical and radiological evaluation of Trabecular Metal and the Smith-Robinson technique in anterior cervical fusion for degenerative disease: a prospective, randomized, controlled study with 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Håkan Löfgren; M Engquist; P Hoffmann; B Sigstedt; L Vavruch
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.