Literature DB >> 15862449

Quantitative analysis of adhesion and biofilm formation on hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces of clinical isolates of Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Nuno Cerca1, Gerald B Pier, Manuel Vilanova, Rosário Oliveira, Joana Azeredo.   

Abstract

Staphylococcus epidermidis is now well established as a major nosocomial pathogen associated with infections of indwelling medical devices. The major virulence factor of these organisms is their ability to adhere to devices and form biofilms. However, it has not been established that adherence and biofilm formation are closely linked phenotypes for clinical isolates. In this study, the initial adhesion to different materials (acrylic and glass) of 9 clinical isolates of S. epidermidis, along with biofilm-positive and biofilm-negative control strains, was assayed using physico-chemical interactions to analyze the basis for bacterial adherence to the substratum. X-ray photo electron spectroscopy (XPS) analysis of the cell surface elemental composition was also performed in an attempt to find a relationship between chemical composition and adhesion capabilities. Biofilm formation on the two surfaces was evaluated by dry weight measurements. Human erythrocytes were used to evaluate the ability of S. epidermidis strains to cause hemagglutination, an indicator of the production of a poly-N-acetyl glucosamine cell surface polysaccharide also involved in biofilm formation. The clinical isolates exhibited different cell wall physico-chemical properties, resulting in differing abilities to adhere to surfaces. Adhesion to hydrophobic substrata for all strains occurred to a greater extent than that to hydrophilic surfaces. Bacterial cell hydrophobicity seemed to have little or no influence on adhesion. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy analysis showed a high ratio of oxygen/carbon for all strains, which is a common characteristic of S. epidermidis species. No relevant relationship was found between XPS data and adhesion values. All strains forming biofilms were able to agglutinate erythrocytes. However, no direct relationship was found between the amount of biofilm formed and the initial adhesion extent. These results indicate that high levels of initial adherence do not necessarily lead to thick biofilm formation. These two aspects of the pathogenesis of medical device related-infection may need to be evaluated independently to ascertain the contribution of each to the virulence of S. epidermidis causing device-related infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15862449      PMCID: PMC1356821          DOI: 10.1016/j.resmic.2005.01.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Microbiol        ISSN: 0923-2508            Impact factor:   3.992


  32 in total

Review 1.  Contribution of the hydrophobic effect to microbial infection.

Authors:  R J Doyle
Journal:  Microbes Infect       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.700

2.  Physico-chemistry of initial microbial adhesive interactions--its mechanisms and methods for study.

Authors:  R Bos; H C van der Mei; H J Busscher
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 16.408

3.  Screening for Staphylococcus epidermidis markers discriminating between skin-flora strains and those responsible for infections of joint prostheses.

Authors:  J O Galdbart; J Allignet; H S Tung; C Rydèn; N El Solh
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2000-07-06       Impact factor: 5.226

4.  Analysis of bacterial detachment from substratum surfaces by the passage of air-liquid interfaces.

Authors:  C Gómez-Suárez; H J Busscher; H C van der Mei
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Adhesion to silicone rubber of yeasts and bacteria isolated from voice prostheses: influence of salivary conditioning films.

Authors:  H J Busscher; G I Geertsema-Doornbusch; H C van der Mei
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1997-02

Review 6.  Staphylococcus epidermidis infections.

Authors:  Cuong Vuong; Michael Otto
Journal:  Microbes Infect       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.700

7.  Molecular basis of intercellular adhesion in the biofilm-forming Staphylococcus epidermidis.

Authors:  C Heilmann; O Schweitzer; C Gerke; N Vanittanakom; D Mack; F Götz
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.501

8.  Transposon mutants of Staphylococcus epidermidis deficient in elaboration of capsular polysaccharide/adhesin and slime are avirulent in a rabbit model of endocarditis.

Authors:  H Shiro; E Muller; N Gutierrez; S Boisot; M Grout; T D Tosteson; D Goldmann; G B Pier
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 5.226

Review 9.  Biologic properties and vaccine potential of the staphylococcal poly-N-acetyl glucosamine surface polysaccharide.

Authors:  Tomas Maira-Litran; Andrea Kropec; Donald Goldmann; Gerald B Pier
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2004-02-17       Impact factor: 3.641

10.  Essential functional role of the polysaccharide intercellular adhesin of Staphylococcus epidermidis in hemagglutination.

Authors:  D Mack; J Riedewald; H Rohde; T Magnus; H H Feucht; H A Elsner; R Laufs; M E Rupp
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.441

View more
  59 in total

1.  Comparative assessment of antibiotic susceptibility of coagulase-negative staphylococci in biofilm versus planktonic culture as assessed by bacterial enumeration or rapid XTT colorimetry.

Authors:  Nuno Cerca; Silvia Martins; Filipe Cerca; Kimberly K Jefferson; Gerald B Pier; Rosário Oliveira; Joana Azeredo
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2005-06-24       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 2.  Skin microbiota: a source of disease or defence?

Authors:  A L Cogen; V Nizet; R L Gallo
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 9.302

3.  An approach to study ultrastructural changes and adaptive strategies displayed by Acinetobacter guillouiae SFC 500-1A under simultaneous Cr(VI) and phenol treatment.

Authors:  Marilina Fernández; Gustavo M Morales; Elizabeth Agostini; Paola S González
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  From Staphylococcus aureus gene regulation to its pattern formation.

Authors:  A Oelker; T Horger; C Kuttler
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 2.259

5.  Evaluation of the ability of Acinetobacter baumannii to form biofilms on six different biomedical relevant surfaces.

Authors:  C Greene; J Wu; A H Rickard; C Xi
Journal:  Lett Appl Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-28       Impact factor: 2.858

6.  Molecular basis for preferential protective efficacy of antibodies directed to the poorly acetylated form of staphylococcal poly-N-acetyl-beta-(1-6)-glucosamine.

Authors:  Nuno Cerca; Kimberly K Jefferson; Tomas Maira-Litrán; Danielle B Pier; Casie Kelly-Quintos; Donald A Goldmann; Joana Azeredo; Gerald B Pier
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2007-04-30       Impact factor: 3.441

7.  Reducing Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation on stainless steel 316L using functionalized self-assembled monolayers.

Authors:  Kristen M Kruszewski; Laura Nistico; Mark J Longwell; Matthew J Hynes; Joshua A Maurer; Luanne Hall-Stoodley; Ellen S Gawalt
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 7.328

8.  Influence of Surface Properties on the Adhesion of Staphylococcus epidermidis to Acrylic and Silicone.

Authors:  Cláudia Sousa; Pilar Teixeira; Rosário Oliveira
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2009-01-25

9.  Candida albicans virulence and drug-resistance requires the O-acyltransferase Gup1p.

Authors:  Célia Ferreira; Sónia Silva; Fábio Faria-Oliveira; Eva Pinho; Mariana Henriques; Cândida Lucas
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.605

10.  Effect of UV-photofunctionalization on oral bacterial attachment and biofilm formation to titanium implant material.

Authors:  Erica Dorigatti de Avila; Bruno P Lima; Takeo Sekiya; Yasuyoshi Torii; Takahiro Ogawa; Wenyuan Shi; Renate Lux
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 12.479

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.