Literature DB >> 15979120

Recovery of thermophilic campylobacters from pond water and sediment and the problem of interference by background bacteria in enrichment culture.

H H Abulreesh1, T A Paget, R Goulder.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to address problems in the determination of thermophilic campylobacters in turbid pond water and sediment. Thirty sets of three samples of pond water (volumes 10, 100, 1000 ml) or sediment (0.1, 1.0, 5.0 ml) were examined for the presence of thermophilic campylobacters. The different volumes of pond water were processed by membrane filtration followed by selective enrichment. The samples of sediment were subjected directly to selective enrichment. Presumptive isolates were confirmed by Gram stain, cell morphology, presence of oxidase and catalase, growth under microaerobic but not aerobic conditions, and PCR. Confirmed Campylobacter species were recovered only from 10 and 100 ml samples of water and from 0.1 and 1.0 ml samples of sediments. The 1000 ml samples of water and 5.0 ml samples of sediment never gave positive isolates. PCR indicated that the confirmed isolates were all either Campylobacter jejuni or C. coli. Enrichment cultures from 1000 ml filtrations contained the highest number of background bacteria. It is suggested that the processing of large volumes of turbid environmental water samples or of sediment is counterproductive and may not yield positive Campylobacter cultures. This is probably due to antagonistic effects of large numbers of background bacteria out-competing campylobacters during the enrichment stage. Pilot studies to establish appropriate volumes of pond water or sediment samples should be undertaken before routine determination of campylobacters is begun.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15979120     DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2005.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Water Res        ISSN: 0043-1354            Impact factor:   11.236


  6 in total

1.  Development of a rapid and sensitive method combining a cellulose ester microfilter and a real-time quantitative PCR assay to detect Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in 20 liters of drinking water or low-turbidity waters.

Authors:  Adeline Tissier; Martine Denis; Philippe Hartemann; Benoît Gassilloud
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Environmental monitoring of waterborne Campylobacter: evaluation of the Australian standard and a hybrid extraction-free MPN-PCR method.

Authors:  Rebekah Henry; Christelle Schang; Gayani I Chandrasena; Ana Deletic; Mark Edmunds; Dusan Jovanovic; Peter Kolotelo; Jonathan Schmidt; Richard Williamson; David McCarthy
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 5.640

3.  Diversity and Persistence of Salmonella enterica Strains in Rural Landscapes in the Southeastern United States.

Authors:  John J Maurer; Gordon Martin; Sonia Hernandez; Ying Cheng; Peter Gerner-Smidt; Kelley B Hise; Melissa Tobin D'Angelo; Dana Cole; Susan Sanchez; Marguerite Madden; Steven Valeika; Andrea Presotto; Erin K Lipp
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Influencing factors and applicability of the viability EMA-qPCR for a detection and quantification of Campylobacter cells from water samples.

Authors:  Diana Seinige; Maren von Köckritz-Blickwede; Carsten Krischek; Günter Klein; Corinna Kehrenberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Campylobacter in an Urban Estuary: Public Health Insights from Occurrence, HeLa Cytotoxicity, and Caco-2 Attachment Cum Invasion.

Authors:  Mahbubul H Siddiqee; Rebekah Henry; Rhys A Coleman; Ana Deletic; David T McCarthy
Journal:  Microbes Environ       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  An Improved Culture Method for Selective Isolation of Campylobacter jejuni from Wastewater.

Authors:  Jinyong Kim; Euna Oh; Graham S Banting; Shannon Braithwaite; Linda Chui; Nicholas J Ashbolt; Norman F Neumann; Byeonghwa Jeon
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 5.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.