Literature DB >> 22138985

Development of a rapid and sensitive method combining a cellulose ester microfilter and a real-time quantitative PCR assay to detect Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in 20 liters of drinking water or low-turbidity waters.

Adeline Tissier1, Martine Denis, Philippe Hartemann, Benoît Gassilloud.   

Abstract

Investigations of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in samples of drinking water suspected of being at the origin of an outbreak very often lead to negative results. One of the reasons for this failure is the small volume of water typically used for detecting these pathogens (10 to 1,000 ml). The efficiencies of three microfilters and different elution procedures were determined using real-time quantitative PCR to propose a procedure allowing detection of Campylobacter in 20 liters of drinking water or low-turbidity water samples. The results showed that more than 80% of the bacteria inoculated in 1 liter of drinking water were retained on each microfilter. An elution with a solution containing 3% beef extract, 0.05 M glycine at pH 9, combined with direct extraction of the bacterial genomes retained on the cellulose ester microfilter, allowed recovery of 87.3% (±22% [standard deviation]) of Campylobacter per 1 liter of tap water. Recoveries obtained from 20-liter volumes of tap water spiked with a C. coli strain were 69.5% (±10.3%) and 78.5% (±15.1%) for 91 CFU and 36 CFU, respectively. Finally, tests performed on eight samples of 20 liters of groundwater collected from an alluvial well used for the production of drinking water revealed the presence of C. jejuni and C. coli genomes, whereas no bacteria were detected with the normative culture method in volumes ranging from 10 to 1,000 ml. In the absence of available epidemiological data and information on bacterial viability, these last results indicate only that the water resource is not protected from contamination by Campylobacter.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22138985      PMCID: PMC3264133          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.06754-11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  21 in total

Review 1.  Campylobacters in water, sewage and the environment.

Authors:  K Jones
Journal:  Symp Ser Soc Appl Microbiol       Date:  2001

Review 2.  Campylobacter in waterfowl and aquatic environments: incidence and methods of detection.

Authors:  Hussein H Abulreesh; Timothy A Paget; Raymond Goulder
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-12-01       Impact factor: 9.028

3.  Evaluation of 1MDS electropositive microfilters for simultaneous recovery of multiple microbe classes from tap water.

Authors:  Amy L Polaczyk; Jacqueline M Roberts; Vincent R Hill
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2006-10-05       Impact factor: 2.363

4.  Molecular detection of Campylobacter spp. in drinking, recreational and environmental water supplies.

Authors:  J Moore; P Caldwell; B Millar
Journal:  Int J Hyg Environ Health       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.840

5.  Development of a real-time fluorescence resonance energy transfer PCR to identify the main pathogenic Campylobacter spp.

Authors:  A Ménard; F Dachet; V Prouzet-Mauleon; M Oleastro; F Mégraud
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 8.067

6.  Recovery of thermophilic campylobacters from pond water and sediment and the problem of interference by background bacteria in enrichment culture.

Authors:  H H Abulreesh; T A Paget; R Goulder
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 11.236

Review 7.  Campylobacter jejuni Infections: update on emerging issues and trends.

Authors:  B M Allos
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-03-28       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Description and sources of contamination by Campylobacter spp. of river water destined for human consumption in Brittany, France.

Authors:  M Denis; B Chidaine; M-J Laisney; F Mégraud; P Fravalo
Journal:  Pathol Biol (Paris)       Date:  2009-11-25

9.  Prevalence and occurrence of zoonotic bacterial pathogens in surface waters determined by quantitative PCR.

Authors:  W Ahmed; S Sawant; F Huygens; A Goonetilleke; T Gardner
Journal:  Water Res       Date:  2009-04-10       Impact factor: 11.236

10.  A methods comparison for the isolation and detection of thermophilic Campylobacter in agricultural watersheds.

Authors:  Izhar U H Khan; Vic Gannon; Alyssa Loughborough; Cassandra Jokinen; Rob Kent; Wendell Koning; David R Lapen; Diane Medeiros; Jim Miller; Norman Neumann; Rob Phillips; Will Robertson; Hans Schreier; Edward Topp; Eric van Bochove; Thomas A Edge
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2009-10-06       Impact factor: 2.363

View more
  6 in total

1.  A novel triplex quantitative PCR strategy for quantification of toxigenic and nontoxigenic Vibrio cholerae in aquatic environments.

Authors:  Rupert Bliem; Sonja Schauer; Helga Plicka; Adelheid Obwaller; Regina Sommer; Adolf Steinrigl; Munirul Alam; Georg H Reischer; Andreas H Farnleitner; Alexander Kirschner
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Comparative analysis and limitations of ethidium monoazide and propidium monoazide treatments for the differentiation of viable and nonviable campylobacter cells.

Authors:  Diana Seinige; Carsten Krischek; Günter Klein; Corinna Kehrenberg
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Influencing factors and applicability of the viability EMA-qPCR for a detection and quantification of Campylobacter cells from water samples.

Authors:  Diana Seinige; Maren von Köckritz-Blickwede; Carsten Krischek; Günter Klein; Corinna Kehrenberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  One step forwards for the routine use of high-throughput DNA sequencing in environmental monitoring. An efficient and standardizable method to maximize the detection of environmental bacteria.

Authors:  Antonia Bruno; Anna Sandionigi; Andrea Galimberti; Eleonora Siani; Massimo Labra; Clementina Cocuzza; Emanuele Ferri; Maurizio Casiraghi
Journal:  Microbiologyopen       Date:  2016-10-27       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Ruminant and chicken: important sources of campylobacteriosis in France despite a variation of source attribution in 2009 and 2015.

Authors:  Amandine Thépault; Valérie Rose; Ségolène Quesne; Typhaine Poezevara; Véronique Béven; Edouard Hirchaud; Fabrice Touzain; Pierrick Lucas; Guillaume Méric; Leonardos Mageiros; Samuel K Sheppard; Marianne Chemaly; Katell Rivoal
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Prevalence and Characteristics of Campylobacter Throughout the Slaughter Process of Different Broiler Batches.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Zhang; Mengjun Tang; Qian Zhou; Jing Zhang; Xingxing Yang; Yushi Gao
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 5.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.