Literature DB >> 15979051

Comparison of MukB homodimer versus MukBEF complex molecular architectures by electron microscopy reveals a higher-order multimerization.

Kyoko Matoba1, Mitsuyoshi Yamazoe, Kouta Mayanagi, Kosuke Morikawa, Sota Hiraga.   

Abstract

The complex of MukF, MukE, and MukB proteins participates in organization of sister chromosomes and partitioning into both daughter cells in Escherichia coli. We purified the MukB homodimer and the MukBEF complex and analyzed them by electron microscopy to compare both structures. A MukB homodimer shows a long rod-hinge-rod v-shape with small globular domains at both ends. The MukBEF complex shows a similar structure having larger globular domains than those of the MukB homodimer. These results suggest that MukF and MukE bind to the globular domains of a MukB homodimer. The globular domains of the MukBEF complex frequently associate with each other in an intramolecular fashion, forming a ring. In addition, MukBEF complex molecules tend to form multimers by the end-to-end joining with other MukBEF molecules in an intermolecular fashion, resulting in fibers and rosette-form structures in the absence of ATP and DNA in vitro.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15979051     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.05.163

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun        ISSN: 0006-291X            Impact factor:   3.575


  30 in total

1.  Using DNA as a fiducial marker to study SMC complex interactions with the atomic force microscope.

Authors:  M E Fuentes-Perez; E J Gwynn; M S Dillingham; F Moreno-Herrero
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Escherichia coli condensin MukB stimulates topoisomerase IV activity by a direct physical interaction.

Authors:  Yinyin Li; Nichole K Stewart; Anthony J Berger; Seychelle Vos; Allyn J Schoeffler; James M Berger; Brian T Chait; Martha G Oakley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  SMC complexes in bacterial chromosome condensation and segregation.

Authors:  Alexander V Strunnikov
Journal:  Plasmid       Date:  2005-10-17       Impact factor: 3.466

4.  DNA reshaping by MukB. Right-handed knotting, left-handed supercoiling.

Authors:  Zoya M Petrushenko; Chien-Hung Lai; Rachna Rai; Valentin V Rybenkov
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-12-20       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  Chromosome condensation in the absence of the non-SMC subunits of MukBEF.

Authors:  Qinhong Wang; Elena A Mordukhova; Andrea L Edwards; Valentin V Rybenkov
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Antagonistic interactions of kleisins and DNA with bacterial Condensin MukB.

Authors:  Zoya M Petrushenko; Chien-Hung Lai; Valentin V Rybenkov
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  A new family of bacterial condensins.

Authors:  Zoya M Petrushenko; Weifeng She; Valentin V Rybenkov
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 3.501

8.  MukEF Is required for stable association of MukB with the chromosome.

Authors:  Weifeng She; Qinhong Wang; Elena A Mordukhova; Valentin V Rybenkov
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-07-20       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  ATP-induced shrinkage of DNA with MukB protein and the MukBEF complex of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Ning Chen; Anatoly A Zinchenko; Yuko Yoshikawa; Sumiko Araki; Shun Adachi; Mitsuyoshi Yamazoe; Sota Hiraga; Kenichi Yoshikawa
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 10.  Functional taxonomy of bacterial hyperstructures.

Authors:  Vic Norris; Tanneke den Blaauwen; Armelle Cabin-Flaman; Roy H Doi; Rasika Harshey; Laurent Janniere; Alfonso Jimenez-Sanchez; Ding Jun Jin; Petra Anne Levin; Eugenia Mileykovskaya; Abraham Minsky; Milton Saier; Kirsten Skarstad
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 11.056

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.