Literature DB >> 15976230

Reduction of anesthesia process times after the introduction of an internal transfer pricing system for anesthesia services.

Martin Schuster1, Thomas Standl, Hajo Reissmann, Ludwig Kuntz, Jochen Schulte Am Esch.   

Abstract

To improve operating room workflow, an internal transfer pricing system (ITPS) for anesthesia services was introduced in our hospital in 2001. The basic principle of the ITPS is that the department of anesthesia receives reimbursement only for the surgically controlled time, not for anesthesia-controlled time (ACT). A reduction in anesthesia process times is therefore beneficial for the anesthesia department. In this study, we analyzed the ACT (with its parts: preparation before induction, induction, extubation, and recovery room transfer) for 3 yr before and 3 yr after the introduction of the ITPS in 55,776 cases. Furthermore, the anesthesia cases were subsegmented into 10 different anesthesia techniques, and the process times were studied. The average total ACT was reduced from 40.4 +/- 23.5 min in 1998 to 34.3 +/- 21.7 min in 2003. The main effect came from reductions in anesthesia preparation time and recovery room transfer time, whereas induction and extubation time changed little. A significant reduction in average ACT was seen in 7 of 10 analyzed anesthesia techniques, ranging from 4 to 18 min. We conclude that transfer pricing of anesthesia services based on the surgically controlled time can be a successful approach to reduce anesthesia process times.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15976230     DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000154187.47998.60

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  7 in total

1.  [The use of diagnosis-related-groups data for external benchmarking of anesthesia and intensive care services].

Authors:  M Schuster; L Kuntz; D Hermening; M Bauer; K Abel; A E Goetz
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 2.  [Operation room management in quality control certification of a mainstream hospital].

Authors:  W Leidinger; J N Meierhofer; G Schüpfer
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  [Key performance indicators of OR efficiency. Myths and evidence of key performance indicators in OR management].

Authors:  M Schuster; L L Wicha; M Fiege
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  [Utilization rates and turnover times as indicators of OR workflow efficiency].

Authors:  M Schuster; L L Wicha; M Fiege; A E Goetz
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  [The Göttingen manual for OR managers].

Authors:  M Bauer; J Hinz; A Klockgether-Radke
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Operating room management and operating room productivity: the case of Germany.

Authors:  Maresi Berry; Thomas Berry-Stölzle; Alexander Schleppers
Journal:  Health Care Manag Sci       Date:  2008-09

7.  Estimating anesthesia time using the medicare claim: a validation study.

Authors:  Jeffrey H Silber; Paul R Rosenbaum; Orit Even-Shoshan; Lanyu Mi; Fabienne A Kyle; Yun Teng; Dale W Bratzler; Lee A Fleisher
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 7.892

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.