Literature DB >> 1597601

Effect of ear-canal air pressure on evoked otoacoustic emissions.

S L Naeve1, R H Margolis, S C Levine, E M Fournier.   

Abstract

The effect of ear-canal air pressure on click-evoked otoacoustic emissions was measured for pressures ranging from 200 to -200 daPa and stimulus levels ranging from 60-90 dB PeSPL. Positive and negative ear-canal pressures (relative to ambient pressure) reduced the emission amplitude by 3-6 dB. A spectral analysis of the emissions revealed that the effect of ear-canal air pressure is that of a high-pass filter with a cutoff frequency of 2600 Hz and a slope of 4 dB/oct. The spectral changes are the expected effect of an increase in stiffness of the middle ear and were independent of pressure polarity and click level. Ear-canal air pressure substantially reduced the reproducibility of the emission waveform, in many cases rendering the emission indistinguishable from background noise. The implication of these findings for hearing screening applications is that a high false alarm rate may occur in normal-hearing patients with intratympanic air pressures that are significantly different from ambient pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1597601     DOI: 10.1121/1.403695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  12 in total

1.  Chirp-Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions and Middle Ear Absorbance for Monitoring Ototoxicity in Cystic Fibrosis Patients.

Authors:  Angela C Garinis; Douglas H Keefe; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Daniel B Putterman; Garnett P McMillan; Jeffrey A Gold; M Patrick Feeney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jan/Feb       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Pressurized transient otoacoustic emissions measured using click and chirp stimuli.

Authors:  Douglas H Keefe; M Patrick Feeney; Lisa L Hunter; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Chris A Sanford
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Influence of static middle ear pressure on transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions and distortion products.

Authors:  P K Plinkert; F Bootz; T Vossieck
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Distortion Product Otoacoustic Emissions in Screening for Early Stages of High-frequency Hearing Loss in Adolescents.

Authors:  Danique E Paping; Marc van der Schroef; Hiske W Helleman; André Goedegebure; Rob J Baatenburg de Jong; Jantien L Vroegop
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2022 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.293

5.  Assessing Sensorineural Hearing Loss Using Various Transient-Evoked Otoacoustic Emission Stimulus Conditions.

Authors:  Daniel B Putterman; Douglas H Keefe; Lisa L Hunter; Angela C Garinis; Denis F Fitzpatrick; Garnett P McMillan; M Patrick Feeney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2017 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 6.  Masculinization of the mammalian cochlea.

Authors:  Dennis McFadden
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Reliability of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and their relation to loudness.

Authors:  Megan J Thorson; Judy G Kopun; Stephen T Neely; Hongyang Tan; Michael P Gorga
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 2.482

8.  Effect of age on click-evoked otoacoustic emission: A systematic review.

Authors:  Jinfeng Liu; Ningyu Wang
Journal:  Neural Regen Res       Date:  2012-04-15       Impact factor: 5.135

9.  Top-Down Cognitive and Linguistic Influences on the Suppression of Spontaneous Otoacoustic Emissions.

Authors:  Viorica Marian; Tuan Q Lam; Sayuri Hayakawa; Sumitrajit Dhar
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Acoustic immittance in children without otoacoustic emissions.

Authors:  Ana Emilia Linares; Renata Mota Mamede Carvallo
Journal:  Braz J Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2008 May-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.