Literature DB >> 15975453

Early visual results with the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens.

Murat Dogru1, Rie Honda, Masahiro Omoto, Ikuko Toda, Hiroshi Fujishima, Hiroyuki Arai, Mie Matsuyama, Saori Nishijima, Yuji Hida, Yukiko Yagi, Kazuo Tsubota.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To prospectively assess the clinical outcome after implantation of the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens (IOL) and a foldable acrylic IOL (AcrySof, Alcon).
SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Tokyo Dental College, Ichikawa Hospital, Ichikawa, and Minami Aoyama Eye Clinics, Tokyo, Yokohama, Japan.
METHODS: Twenty-two eyes of 16 patients with cataract had phacoemulsification implantation of 1CU accommodating IOL. Twenty eyes of 10 age-matched and sex-matched patients with cataract had the same surgery but with a foldable acrylic IOL. All patients had assessments of the amplitude of accommodation, refraction, uncorrected and best corrected distance and near visual acuity, and distance corrected near visual acuity before surgery up to 12 months after surgery. Contrast visual acuities were measured 1 year after surgery. Anterior segment photography, intraocular pressure measurements, specular microscopy, and computerized topography were also performed.
RESULTS: The final best corrected distance visual acuity was above 20/25 in all eyes with the 1CU and the AcrySof IOLs. The mean distance corrected near visual acuity was significantly higher in the 1CU IOL group than in the acrylic IOL group after 3 months. None of the eyes with the AcrySof IOL implants displayed an accommodative response at any examination. The peak mean amplitude of accommodation with the 1CU IOLs was observed at 3 months and was 0.5 diopters +/- 0.44 (SD). Accommodation amplitude declined after 6 months.
CONCLUSION: The 1CU IOL provided additional near acuity postoperatively, but the benefit disappeared at 12 months with a concomitant decrease in accommodation amplitude owing to an increase in anterior and posterior capsular opacities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15975453     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.10.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  13 in total

Review 1.  [Accommodation and presbyopia : part 2: surgical procedures for the correction of presbyopia].

Authors:  M Baumeister; T Kohnen
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 1.059

2.  Depth of focus in pseudophakic eyes.

Authors:  Nikolai M Sergienko; Yury N Kondratenko; Nikolai N Tutchenko
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 3.  Restoration of accommodation: surgical options for correction of presbyopia.

Authors:  Adrian Glasser
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.742

4.  Objective accommodation measurements in prepresbyopic eyes using an autorefractor and an aberrometer.

Authors:  Dorothy M Win-Hall; Adrian Glasser
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.351

Review 5.  Clinical application of accommodating intraocular lens.

Authors:  You-Ling Liang; Song-Bai Jia
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Functionalised polysiloxanes as injectable, in situ curable accommodating intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Xiaojuan Hao; Justine L Jeffery; John S Wilkie; Gordon F Meijs; Anthony B Clayton; Jason D Watling; Arthur Ho; Viviana Fernandez; Carolina Acosta; Hideo Yamamoto; Mohamed G M Aly; Jean-Marie Parel; Timothy C Hughes
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2010-08-07       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Objective accommodation measurements in pseudophakic subjects using an autorefractor and an aberrometer.

Authors:  Dorothy M Win-Hall; Adrian Glasser
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  Adaptive calibration of dynamic accommodation--implications for accommodating intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Clifton M Schor; Shrikant R Bharadwaj
Journal:  J Refract Surg       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Real and pseudoaccommodation in accommodative lenses.

Authors:  Ioannis G Pallikaris; Georgios A Kontadakis; Dimitra M Portaliou
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-09-18       Impact factor: 1.909

10.  Clinical evaluation of accommodative intraocular lens implantation in high myopic eyes.

Authors:  Jae Hui Kim; Chun Sung Park; Tae Young Chung; Eui Sang Chung
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.