Literature DB >> 18766370

Depth of focus in pseudophakic eyes.

Nikolai M Sergienko1, Yury N Kondratenko, Nikolai N Tutchenko.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess depth of field/depth of focus in pseudophakic eyes as function of visual acuity.
SETTING: Department of ophthalmology of National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education.
METHODS: Forty-three pseudophakic eyes of 43 patients after implantation in the capsular bag of monofocal posterior chamber IOLs were examined. All patients had visual acuities at least 20/20 for distance. Visual acuity was examined by charts consisting the Landolt's rings under defined constant illumination within distance from 3 m to 20 cm from patients' eyes at various distances with difference of 10 cm (29 measurements). Depth of field was calculated in diopters.
RESULTS: The mean value of the depth of field in pseudophakic eyes with pupil diameter of 3 +/- 0.3 mm was as follows: 1.12 D for visual acuity 20/20, 0.62 D for visual acuity 20/13, and 0.47 D for visual acuity 20/10.
CONCLUSIONS: Depth of focus correlates to normal levels of visual acuity. The higher the visual acuity, the lower the depth of focus. The ability of clear vision due to depth of focus-pseudoaccommodation is passive function. Separating the pseudoaccommodation from artificial accommodation in eyes with accommodative IOLs requires strict standardization of methodology especially regarding diameter of pupil, size of test objects, and level of illumination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18766370     DOI: 10.1007/s00417-008-0923-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0721-832X            Impact factor:   3.117


  13 in total

1.  Measurement of accommodation after implantation of an accommodating posterior chamber intraocular lens.

Authors:  Achim Langenbucher; Stefan Huber; Nhung X Nguyen; Berthold Seitz; Gabriele C Gusek-Schneider; Michael Küchle
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.351

2.  Depth of focus of the human eye.

Authors:  K N OGLE; J T SCHWARTZ
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1959-03

3.  Studies on the depth of focus of the eye.

Authors:  G VON BAHR
Journal:  Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh)       Date:  1952

4.  The depth-of-focus of the human eye for Snellen letters.

Authors:  J Tucker; W N Charman
Journal:  Am J Optom Physiol Opt       Date:  1975-01

5.  Pseudoaccommodation with forward movement of IOLs.

Authors:  David A Atchison
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.351

6.  Pilocarpine-induced shift of an accommodating IOL.

Authors:  Steven J Dell
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.351

7.  Restoring accommodation: what is real and what is pseudo?

Authors:  Spencer P Thornton
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.351

8.  Early visual results with the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens.

Authors:  Murat Dogru; Rie Honda; Masahiro Omoto; Ikuko Toda; Hiroshi Fujishima; Hiroyuki Arai; Mie Matsuyama; Saori Nishijima; Yuji Hida; Yukiko Yagi; Kazuo Tsubota
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.351

9.  Intraocular lens movement caused by ciliary muscle contraction.

Authors:  Oliver Findl; Barbara Kiss; Vanessa Petternel; Rupert Menapace; Michael Georgopoulos; Georg Rainer; Wolfgang Drexler
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 3.351

10.  Clinical study of the 1CU accommodating intraocular lens.

Authors:  Leonardo Mastropasqua; Lisa Toto; Mario Nubile; Gennaro Falconio; Enzo Ballone
Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.351

View more
  8 in total

1.  The clinical depth of field achievable with trifocal and monofocal intraocular lenses: theoretical considerations and proof of concept clinical results.

Authors:  Ante Barišić; Sudi Patel; Nikica Gabric; Claes G Feinbaum
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Subjective and objective depth of field measures in pseudophakic eyes: comparison between extended depth of focus, trifocal and bifocal intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Carlos Palomino-Bautista; Rubén Sánchez-Jean; David Carmona-González; David P Piñero; Ainhoa Molina-Martín
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 2.031

3.  Depth of field and visual performance after implantation of a new hydrophobic trifocal intraocular lens.

Authors:  Carlos Palomino-Bautista; Alejandro Cerviño; Ricardo Cuiña-Sardiña; David Carmona-Gonzalez; Alfredo Castillo-Gomez; Ruben Sanchez-Jean
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 2.086

4.  Depth of field measures in pseudophakic eyes implanted with different type of presbyopia-correcting IOLS.

Authors:  Carlos Palomino-Bautista; Rubén Sánchez-Jean; David Carmona-Gonzalez; David P Piñero; Ainhoa Molina-Martín
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Real and pseudoaccommodation in accommodative lenses.

Authors:  Ioannis G Pallikaris; Georgios A Kontadakis; Dimitra M Portaliou
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-09-18       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  The Predictability of Preoperative Pilocarpine-Induced Lens Shift on the Outcomes of Accommodating Intraocular Lenses Implanted in Senile Cataract Patients.

Authors:  Jin Li; Qi Chen; Zhibo Lin; Lin Leng; Fang Huang; Ding Chen
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 1.909

Review 7.  Accommodative intraocular lenses: where are we and where we are going.

Authors:  Jorge L Alió; Jorge L Alió Del Barrio; Alfredo Vega-Estrada
Journal:  Eye Vis (Lond)       Date:  2017-06-26

8.  Effect of Cycloplegia on Corneal Biometrics and Refractive State.

Authors:  Abbas Bagheri; Mohadeseh Feizi; Aliakbar Shafii; Amir Faramarzi; Mehdi Tavakoli; Shahin Yazdani
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.