Literature DB >> 22417792

Leading edge vortex in a slow-flying passerine.

Florian T Muijres1, L Christoffer Johansson, Anders Hedenström.   

Abstract

Most hovering animals, such as insects and hummingbirds, enhance lift by producing leading edge vortices (LEVs) and by using both the downstroke and upstroke for lift production. By contrast, most hovering passerine birds primarily use the downstroke to generate lift. To compensate for the nearly inactive upstroke, weight support during the downstroke needs to be relatively higher in passerines when compared with, e.g. hummingbirds. Here we show, by capturing the airflow around the wing of a freely flying pied flycatcher, that passerines may use LEVs during the downstroke to increase lift. The LEV contributes up to 49 per cent to weight support, which is three times higher than in hummingbirds, suggesting that avian hoverers compensate for the nearly inactive upstroke by generating stronger LEVs. Contrary to other animals, the LEV strength in the flycatcher is lowest near the wing tip, instead of highest. This is correlated with a spanwise reduction of the wing's angle-of-attack, partly owing to upward bending of primary feathers. We suggest that this helps to delay bursting and shedding of the particularly strong LEV in passerines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22417792      PMCID: PMC3391469          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0130

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  12 in total

1.  Kinematics of flight and the relationship to the vortex wake of a Pallas' long tongued bat (Glossophaga soricina).

Authors:  Marta Wolf; L Christoffer Johansson; Rhea von Busse; York Winter; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Leading-edge vortex improves lift in slow-flying bats.

Authors:  F T Muijres; L C Johansson; R Barfield; M Wolf; G R Spedding; A Hedenström
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-02-29       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Rotational accelerations stabilize leading edge vortices on revolving fly wings.

Authors:  David Lentink; Michael H Dickinson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Lift production in the hovering hummingbird.

Authors:  Douglas R Warrick; Bret W Tobalske; Donald R Powers
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Flexible wings and fins: bending by inertial or fluid-dynamic forces?

Authors:  Thomas L Daniel; Stacey A Combes
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.326

6.  Vortex wake, downwash distribution, aerodynamic performance and wingbeat kinematics in slow-flying pied flycatchers.

Authors:  Florian T Muijres; Melissa S Bowlin; L Christoffer Johansson; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Aerodynamic performance of a hovering hawkmoth with flexible wings: a computational approach.

Authors:  Toshiyuki Nakata; Hao Liu
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Leading-edge vortex lifts swifts.

Authors:  J J Videler; E J Stamhuis; G D E Povel
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  The aerodynamics of Manduca sexta: digital particle image velocimetry analysis of the leading-edge vortex.

Authors:  Richard J Bomphrey; Nicholas J Lawson; Nicholas J Harding; Graham K Taylor; Adrian L R Thomas
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Aerodynamics of the hovering hummingbird.

Authors:  Douglas R Warrick; Bret W Tobalske; Donald R Powers
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  9 in total

1.  Power reduction and the radial limit of stall delay in revolving wings of different aspect ratio.

Authors:  Jan W Kruyt; GertJan F van Heijst; Douglas L Altshuler; David Lentink
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-04-06       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 2.  The role of the leading edge vortex in lift augmentation of steadily revolving wings: a change in perspective.

Authors:  Mostafa R A Nabawy; William J Crowther
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Power of the wingbeat: modelling the effects of flapping wings in vertebrate flight.

Authors:  M Klein Heerenbrink; L C Johansson; A Hedenström
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.704

4.  Mechanical power curve measured in the wake of pied flycatchers indicates modulation of parasite power across flight speeds.

Authors:  L Christoffer Johansson; Masateru Maeda; Per Henningsson; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 4.118

5.  Multiple leading edge vortices of unexpected strength in freely flying hawkmoth.

Authors:  L Christoffer Johansson; Sophia Engel; Almut Kelber; Marco Klein Heerenbrink; Anders Hedenström
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  In vivo recording of aerodynamic force with an aerodynamic force platform: from drones to birds.

Authors:  David Lentink; Andreas F Haselsteiner; Rivers Ingersoll
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Scaling trends of bird's alular feathers in connection to leading-edge vortex flow over hand-wing.

Authors:  Thomas Linehan; Kamran Mohseni
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Great tits do not compensate over time for a radio-tag-induced reduction in escape-flight performance.

Authors:  Barbara M Tomotani; Florian T Muijres; Bronwyn Johnston; Henk P van der Jeugd; Marc Naguib
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Quantifying the dynamic wing morphing of hovering hummingbird.

Authors:  Masateru Maeda; Toshiyuki Nakata; Ikuo Kitamura; Hiroto Tanaka; Hao Liu
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.963

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.