Literature DB >> 15973098

Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus milligan-morgan hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial with 2-year postoperative follow up.

Jean François Gravié1, Paul-Antoine Lehur, Noël Huten, Marc Papillon, Michel Fantoli, Bernard Descottes, Patrick Pessaux, Jean-Pierre Arnaud.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH group) performed using a circular stapler with that of the Milligan-Morgan technique (MM group). The goals of the study were to evaluate the efficacy and reproducibility of stapled hemorrhoidopexy and define its place among conventional techniques.
METHODS: A series of 134 patients were included at 7 hospital centers. They were randomized according to a single-masked design and stratified by center (with balancing every 4 patients). Patients were clinically evaluated preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 1 year, and a minimum of 2 years after treatment. Patients completed a questionnaire before and 1 year after surgery to evaluate symptoms, function, and overall satisfaction.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 2.21 years +/- 0.26 (1.89-3.07). Nine patients (7%) could not be monitored at 1 or 2 years, but 4 of these 9 nevertheless filled in the 1-year questionnaire. The patients in the SH group experienced less postoperative pain/discomfort as scored by pain during bowel movement (P < 0.001), total analgesic requirement over the first 3 days (according to the World Health Organization [WHO] class II analgesics [P = 0.002]; class III [P = 0.066]), and per-patient consumption frequency of class III analgesics (P = 0.089). A clear difference in morphine requirement became evident after 24 hours (P = 0.010). Hospital stay was significantly shorter in the SH group (SH 2.2 +/- 1.2 [0; 5.0] versus MM 3.1 +/- 1.7 [1; 8.0] P < 0.001). At 1 year, no differences in the resolution of symptoms were observed between the 2 groups, and over 2 years, the overall incidence of complications was the same, specifically fecaloma (P = 0.003) in the MM group and external hemorrhoidal thrombosis (P = 0.006) in the SH group. Impaired sphincter function was observed at 1 year with no significant difference between the groups for urgency (12%), continence problems (10%), or tenesmus (3%). No patient needed a second procedure for recurrence within 2 years, although partial residual prolapse was detected in 4 SH patients (7.5%) versus 1 MM patient (1.8%) (P = 0.194).
CONCLUSION: Stapled hemorrhoidopexy causes significantly less postoperative pain. The technique is reproducible and can achieve comparable outcomes as those of the MM technique as long as the well-described steps of the technique are followed. Like with conventional surgery, anorectal dysfunction can occur after stapled hemorrhoidopexy in some patients. Its effectiveness in relieving symptoms is equivalent to conventional surgery, and the number of hemorrhoidal prolapse recurrences at 2 years is not significantly different. Hemorroidopexy is applicable for treating reducible hemorrhoidal prolapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15973098      PMCID: PMC1357701          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000169570.64579.31

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  17 in total

1.  Randomized trial assessing anal sphincter injuries after stapled haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  Y H Ho; F Seow-Choen; C Tsang; K W Eu
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.939

2.  Circular stapled anopexy for haemorrhoidal disease: results.

Authors:  P A Lehur; J F Gravié; G Meurette
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.788

3.  Stapled hemorrhoidectomy--cost and effectiveness. Randomized, controlled trial including incontinence scoring, anorectal manometry, and endoanal ultrasound assessments at up to three months.

Authors:  Y H Ho; W K Cheong; C Tsang; J Ho; K W Eu; C L Tang; F Seow-Choen
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.585

4.  Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  M Rowsell; M Bello; D M Hemingway
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-03-04       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Stapling procedure for haemorrhoids versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  B J Mehigan; J R Monson; J E Hartley
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-03-04       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Randomized clinical trial of stapled versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  R Shalaby; A Desoky
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  [Treatment of hemorrhoids with the Longo technique. Preliminary results of a prospective study on 94 cases].

Authors:  M Papillon; J P Arnaud; B Descottes; J F Gravie; X Huten; N De Manzini
Journal:  Chirurgie       Date:  1999-12

8.  Persistent pain and faecal urgency after stapled haemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  M J Cheetham; N J Mortensen; P O Nystrom; M A Kamm; R K Phillips
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2000-08-26       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Day-case stapled (circular) vs. diathermy hemorrhoidectomy: a randomized, controlled trial evaluating surgical and functional outcome.

Authors:  Matti Kairaluoma; Kyösti Nuorva; Ilmo Kellokumpu
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 10.  [Management of postoperative pain in surgical units].

Authors:  A Delbos
Journal:  Ann Fr Anesth Reanim       Date:  1998
View more
  49 in total

1.  Partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy: a minimally invasive technique for hemorrhoids.

Authors:  Hong-Cheng Lin; Qiu-Lan He; Dong-Lin Ren; Hui Peng; Shang-Kui Xie; Dan Su; Xiao-Xue Wang
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 2.549

2.  Partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy for grade III-IV prolapsing hemorrhoids: a two-year prospective controlled study.

Authors:  H-C Lin; D-L Ren; Q-L He; H Peng; S-K Xie; D Su; X-X Wang
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-03-09       Impact factor: 3.781

Review 3.  A systematic review comparing transanal haemorrhoidal de-arterialisation to stapled haemorrhoidopexy in the management of haemorrhoidal disease.

Authors:  M S Sajid; U Parampalli; P Whitehouse; P Sains; M R McFall; M K Baig
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-12-20       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  Hector Ortiz
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  Controversies in the treatment of common anal problems.

Authors:  Ismail Sagap; Feza-H Remzi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 6.  Stapled haemorrhoidopexy compared to Milligan-Morgan and Ferguson haemorrhoidectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  K Laughlan; D G Jayne; D Jackson; F Rupprecht; G Ribaric
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-11-27       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Severe rectal bleeding following PPH-stapler procedure for haemorroidal disease.

Authors:  M Ammendola; Giulio Sammarco; A Carpino; F Ferrari; G Vescio; R Sacco
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

8.  Residual skin tags following procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids: differentiation from recurrence.

Authors:  Xian Hua Gao; Chuan Gang Fu; Paul Fallah-Wandalachi Nabieu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.352

9.  Complications, recurrences, early and late reoperations after stapled haemorrhoidopexy: lessons learned from 1,233 cases.

Authors:  Johannes Jongen; Anne Eberstein; Jens-Uwe Bock; Hans-Günter Peleikis; Volker Kahlke
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 3.445

10.  The tissue selecting technique (TST) versus the Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsing hemorrhoids: a retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  H-C Lin; H-X Luo; A P Zbar; S-K Xie; L Lian; D-L Ren; J-P Wang
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.