Literature DB >> 22402919

Partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy for grade III-IV prolapsing hemorrhoids: a two-year prospective controlled study.

H-C Lin1, D-L Ren, Q-L He, H Peng, S-K Xie, D Su, X-X Wang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy (CSH) is an effective technique for treating prolapsing hemorrhoids; but urgency and anal stenosis are common postoperative complications. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and postoperative outcomes of partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy (PSH), compared with CSH.
METHODS: Seventy-two consecutive patients with grade III and IV hemorrhoids who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria were divided in a non-randomized manner to undergo either PSH (n = 34) or CSH (n = 38). Intraoperative and postoperative parameters in both groups were collected and compared.
RESULTS: The postoperative visual analog score for pain at first defecation was significantly lower in the PSH group than that in the CSH group (P = 0.001). Fewer patients in the PSH group experienced postoperative urgency, compared with those in the CSH group at 12 h, 1 day, and 7 days after surgery (P = 0.025, P = 0.019, and P = 0.043, respectively). Gas incontinence occurred in 3 patients (7.9%) in the CSH group, but in none of patients in the PSH group (P = 0.242). Postoperative anal stenosis developed in one patient (2.6%) in the CSH group, but in none of the patients in the PSH group (P = 1.0). The 2-year recurrence rate was 2.9 and 5.3%, respectively, in the PSH and CSH groups (P = 1.0).
CONCLUSIONS: The 2-year recurrence rate is similar in patients with grade III-IV hemorrhoids treated with PSH or CSH. However, PSH is associated with less postoperative pain, fewer episodes of urgency, and no anal incontinence or anal stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22402919     DOI: 10.1007/s10151-012-0815-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tech Coloproctol        ISSN: 1123-6337            Impact factor:   3.781


  21 in total

1.  Excision of residual skin tags during stapled anopexy does not increase postoperative pain.

Authors:  R Gerjy; P O Nyström
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 3.788

2.  Surgical treatment of anal stenosis.

Authors:  Giuseppe Brisinda; Serafino Vanella; Federica Cadeddu; Gaia Marniga; Pasquale Mazzeo; Francesco Brandara; Giorgio Maria
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Residual skin tags following procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids: differentiation from recurrence.

Authors:  Xian Hua Gao; Chuan Gang Fu; Paul Fallah-Wandalachi Nabieu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Anal stenosis.

Authors:  Mukta V Katdare; Rocco Ricciardi
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Long-term results after stapled hemorrhoidopexy: high patient satisfaction despite frequent postoperative symptoms.

Authors:  P Fueglistaler; M O Guenin; I Montali; B Kern; R Peterli; M von Flüe; C Ackermann
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.585

6.  The Whitehead hemorrhoidectomy. An unjustly maligned procedure.

Authors:  B G Wolff; C E Culp
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Closed vs. open hemorrhoidectomy--is there any difference?

Authors:  G Arbman; H Krook; S Haapaniemi
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.585

Review 8.  Continence disorders after anal surgery--a relevant problem?

Authors:  A Ommer; F A Wenger; T Rolfs; M K Walz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  New approach to large haemorrhoidal prolapse: double stapled haemorrhoidopexy.

Authors:  Gabriele Naldini; Jacopo Martellucci; Pasquale Talento; Angelo Caviglia; Luca Moraldi; Mauro Rossi
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 2.571

10.  Complications and results after stapled haemorrhoidopexy as a day surgical procedure.

Authors:  B Mlakar; P Kosorok
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 3.781

View more
  10 in total

1.  The tissue selecting technique (TST) versus the Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsing hemorrhoids: a retrospective case-control study.

Authors:  H-C Lin; H-X Luo; A P Zbar; S-K Xie; L Lian; D-L Ren; J-P Wang
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 3.781

2.  H.-C. Lin, D.-L. Ren, Q.-L. He, H. Peng, S.-K. Xie, D. Su, X.-X. Wang: Partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy for grade III-IV prolapsing hemorrhoids: a two-year prospective controlled study.

Authors:  I T Khubchandani
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  A prospective randomized controlled trial evaluating the short-term outcomes of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization versus tissue-selecting technique.

Authors:  A L H Leung; T P P Cheung; K Tung; Y P Tsang; H Cheung; C W Lau; C N Tang
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Association of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and hemorrhoids: A nationwide cohort study.

Authors:  Lih-Hwa Lin; Justin Ji-Yuen Siu; Po-Chi Liao; Jen-Huai Chiang; Pei-Chi Chou; Huey-Yi Chen; Tsung-Jung Ho; Ming-Yen Tsai; Yung-Hsiang Chen; Wen-Chi Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Early Experience With a Partial Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy for Treating Patients With Grades III-IV Prolapsing Hemorrhoids.

Authors:  Hyeonseok Jeong; Sunghwan Hwang; Kil O Ryu; Jiyong Lim; Hyun Tae Kim; Hye Mi Yu; Jihoon Yoon; Ju-Young Lee; Hyoung Rae Kim; Young Gil Choi
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2017-02-28

6.  Outcomes of Modified Tissue Selection Therapy Stapler in the Treatment of Prolapsing Hemorrhoids.

Authors:  Chenchen Yuan; Chongjun Zhou; Rong Xue; Xiaofeng Jin; Chun Jin; Chenguo Zheng
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-03-03

7.  Indications, Feasibility, and Safety of TST STARR Plus Stapler for Degree III Hemorrhoids: A Retrospective Study of 125 Hemorrhoids Patients.

Authors:  Jun Wei; Xufeng Ding; Jie Jiang; Lijiang Ji; Hua Huang
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2022-04-13

8.  Partial Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy Versus Circular Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy.

Authors:  Jin Sub Kim
Journal:  Ann Coloproctol       Date:  2017-02-28

9.  Perirectal Hematoma and Intra-Abdominal Bleeding after Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy and STARR-A Proposal for a Decision-Making Algorithm.

Authors:  Georgi Popivanov; Piergiorgio Fedeli; Roberto Cirocchi; Massimo Lancia; Domenico Mascagni; Michela Giustozzi; Ivan Teodosiev; Kirien Kjossev; Marina Konaktchieva
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 2.430

10.  Partial Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy Versus Circumferential Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy for Grade III to IV Prolapsing Hemorrhoids: A Randomized, Noninferiority Trial.

Authors:  Hong-Cheng Lin; Qiu-Lan He; Wan-Jin Shao; Xin-Lin Chen; Hui Peng; Shang-Kui Xie; Xiao-Xue Wang; Dong-Lin Ren
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.585

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.