Literature DB >> 27054135

Use of the Derriford Appearance Scale 59 to assess patient-reported outcomes in secondary cleft surgery.

Sophie Ricketts1, Eran Regev1, Oleh M Antonyshyn1, Alex Kiss1, Jeffrey A Fialkov1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Secondary rhinoplasty, one of the final procedures in addressing the stigma of the cleft lip and palate (CLP), has both functional and aesthetic objectives. The way in which physicians evaluate outcomes in surgery concerning aesthetics is changing. Well-designed patient-reported outcome measures to assess health-related quality of life improvements attributable to surgery are increasingly being used. The Derriford Appearance Scale 59 (DAS-59) is currently the only available validated patient-reported outcome measure that assesses concern about physical appearance.
METHODS: Twenty patients with CLP presenting between May 2009 and May 2013 for secondary rhinoplasty to Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (Toronto, Ontario) were recruited. DAS-59 measures were administered both preoperatively and at least six months after surgery. Pre- and postoperative measures were scored and compared. Item-by-item analysis of the measure was also performed.
RESULTS: Total scores for this CLP group indicated greater concern about appearance than the general population. Across all subscales of the measure, there was a reduction in scores after secondary rhinoplasty suggesting less patient concern with appearance and a positive effect of surgery on patient quality of life. Item-by-item analysis suggested relatively few items in the measure were driving overall change in total scores.
CONCLUSION: Comparison of pre- and postoperative scores with the DAS-59 in secondary cleft rhinoplasty suggests there is less concern with appearance after surgery. However, a small number of items within this generic scale contributing to this difference may suggest the need for a more patient specific measure for assessment of surgical outcomes in the cleft population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cleft lip and palate; Cleft rhinoplasty; DAS-59; Derriford Appearance Scale; Patient-reported outcomes

Year:  2016        PMID: 27054135      PMCID: PMC4806753          DOI: 10.4172/plastic-surgery.1000956

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Surg (Oakv)        ISSN: 2292-5503            Impact factor:   0.947


  19 in total

1.  The DAS24: a short form of the Derriford Appearance Scale DAS59 to measure individual responses to living with problems of appearance.

Authors:  Tony Carr; Timothy Moss; David Harris
Journal:  Br J Health Psychol       Date:  2005-05

2.  The science behind quality-of-life measurement: a primer for plastic surgeons.

Authors:  Stefan J Cano; Anne Klassen; Andrea L Pusic
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 4.730

3.  Reliability of a multidimensional questionnaire for adults with treated complete cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  A Marcusson; T List; G Paulin; I Akerlind
Journal:  Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg       Date:  2001-09

Review 4.  Measuring quality of life in cleft lip and palate patients: currently available patient-reported outcomes measures.

Authors:  Donna A Eckstein; Rebecca L Wu; Takintope Akinbiyi; Lester Silver; Peter J Taub
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 5.  Quality of life of children treated for cleft lip and/or palate: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anne F Klassen; Elena Tsangaris; Christopher R Forrest; Karen W Y Wong; Andrea L Pusic; Stefan J Cano; Iqra Syed; Meghna Dua; Sonika Kainth; Jessica Johnson; Tim Goodacre
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  Self-reported social, speech, and facial concerns and personality adjustment of adolescents with cleft lip and palate.

Authors:  L C Richman
Journal:  Cleft Palate J       Date:  1983-04

7.  Psychosocial functioning in children with and without orofacial clefts and their parents.

Authors:  Brent R Collett; Yona Keich Cloonan; Matthew L Speltz; Marlene Anderka; Martha M Werler
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2011-01-01

Review 8.  Patient-based measures of outcome in plastic surgery: current approaches and future directions.

Authors:  S J Cano; J P Browne; D L Lamping
Journal:  Br J Plast Surg       Date:  2004-01

Review 9.  Measuring outcomes in craniofacial and pediatric plastic surgery.

Authors:  Karen W Y Wong; Christopher R Forrest; Tim E E Goodacre; Anne F Klassen
Journal:  Clin Plast Surg       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 2.017

Review 10.  MOC-PS(SM) CME article: late cleft lip nasal deformity.

Authors:  Bahman Guyuron
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 4.730

View more
  2 in total

1.  Self-Consciousness of Appearance in Chinese Patients With Cleft Lip: Validation of the Chinese Derriford Appearance Scale 59 (DAS 59) Instrument.

Authors:  Karim A Sakran; Sixing Song; Huo Li; Peiyue Pan; Nan Chen; Ni Zeng; Ting Chi; Bing Shi; Hanyao Huang; Yan Wang; Caixia Gong
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 3.418

2.  Comparison of Corresponding Scores From the Cleft Hearing Appearance and Speech Questionnaire (CHASQ) and CLEFT-Q in Swedish Patients With Cleft Lip and/or Palate.

Authors:  Mia Stiernman; Kristina Klintö; Martin Persson; Magnus Becker
Journal:  Cleft Palate Craniofac J       Date:  2020-10-13
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.