Literature DB >> 15968515

The value of drip infusion cholangiography using multidetector-row helical CT in patients with choledocholithiasis.

Masahiro Okada1, Jun-Ichi Fukada, Kazuhito Toya, Reiko Ito, Toshio Ohashi, Atsunori Yorozu.   

Abstract

The purposes of this study were to investigate the feasibility of drip infusion cholangiography computed tomography (CTCh) for choledocholithiasis and to compare the detection of the stone on CTCh with that of MR cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). CTCh examinations were performed after infusion of intravenous biliary contrast material (iotroxic acid meglumine, 100 ml) for patients with suspected biliary diseases and were reconstructed to maximum intensity projection (MIP) and multiplanar reformation (MPR). Of 432 patients who underwent CTCh, we identified 15 who underwent surgery or cholangioscopic removal for choledocholithiasis and 32 patients who underwent cholecystectomy due to cholecystolithiasis. Their MRCP images were compared with the CTCh images. The sensitivity and specificity of CTCh for detecting choledochal stones were 87% and 96% whereas those of MRCP were 80% and 88%. The sensitivity and specificity of CTCh for detecting gallstones were 78% and 100% whereas those of MRCP were 94% and 88%. CTCh allowed high sensitivity and specificity for detecting choledochal stones but diminished the detection for cholecystolithiasis compared with MRCP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15968515     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-005-2820-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  10 in total

1.  MR cholangiopancreatography: prospective comparison of a breath-hold 2D projection technique with diagnostic ERCP.

Authors:  D J Lomas; P W Bearcroft; A E Gimson
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  The clinical utility of spiral CT cholangiography.

Authors:  D J Breen; A A Nicholson
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.350

3.  Reevaluation of spiral CT cholangiography: basic considerations and reliability for detecting choledocholithiasis in 80 patients.

Authors:  M Takahashi; Y Saida; Y Itai; N Gunji; K Orii; Y Watanabe
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.826

4.  Evaluation of aberrant bile ducts before laparoscopic cholecystectomy: helical CT cholangiography versus MR cholangiography.

Authors:  K Hirao; A Miyazaki; T Fujimoto; I Isomoto; K Hayashi
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 3.959

5.  Oral contrast-enhanced three-dimensional helical-CT cholangiography: clinical applications.

Authors:  Amato Antonio Stabile Ianora; Maurizio Memeo; Arnaldo Scardapane; Antonio Rotondo; Giuseppe Angelelli
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-07-23       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Pitfalls in the interpretation of MR cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  V David; C Reinhold; M Hochman; R Chuttani; J McKee; I Waxman; L Wang; W Li; R Kaplan; R R Edelman
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Transhepatic cholangiography: complicatons and use patterns of the fine-needle technique: a multi-institutional survey.

Authors:  W P Harbin; P R Mueller; J T Ferrucci
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  MR cholangiography and CT cholangiography of pediatric patients with choledochal cysts.

Authors:  W W Lam; T P Lam; H Saing; F L Chan; K L Chan
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  A practical reappraisal of the anatomy of the extrahepatic bile ducts and arteries.

Authors:  E A Benson; R E Page
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Breath-hold MR cholangiography with snapshot techniques: prospective comparison with endoscopic retrograde cholangiography.

Authors:  N Holzknecht; J Gauger; M Sackmann; R F Thoeni; J Schurig; J Holl; M Weinzierl; T Helmberger; G Paumgartner; M Reiser
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 11.105

  10 in total
  12 in total

Review 1.  CT and MR cholangiography: advantages and pitfalls in perioperative evaluation of biliary tree.

Authors:  T Hyodo; S Kumano; F Kushihata; M Okada; M Hirata; T Tsuda; Y Takada; T Mochizuki; T Murakami
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Choledocholithiasis: repetitive thick-slab single-shot projection magnetic resonance cholangiopancreaticography versus endoscopic ultrasonography.

Authors:  S Schmidt; P Chevallier; S Novellas; E Gelsi; G Vanbiervliet; A Tran; P Schnyder; J N Bruneton
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-08-29       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  A study of multi-detector row CT scan on greater omentum in 50 individuals: correlating with anatomical basis and clinical application.

Authors:  Hang Jin; Peng-qiu Min; Zhi-gang Yang; Bin Song; Bing Wu
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2007-12-04       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 4.  Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Wen Chen; Jing-Jia Mo; Li Lin; Chao-Qun Li; Jian-Feng Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Minimum intensity projections of the biliary system using 16-channel multidetector computed tomography in patients with biliary obstruction: comparison with MRCP.

Authors:  Timm Denecke; Erika Degutyte; Lars Stelter; Lukas Lehmkuhl; Ray Valencia; Enrique Lopez-Hänninen; Roland Felix; Christian Stroszczynski
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-03-03       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Three-dimensional drip infusion CT cholangiography in patients with suspected obstructive biliary disease: a retrospective analysis of feasibility and adverse reaction to contrast material.

Authors:  A Persson; N Dahlström; O Smedby; T B Brismar
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 1.930

7.  Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance pancreatography with gadoteridol by heavily T2-weighted three-dimensional fluid-attenuated inversion recovery: preliminary results in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Kojiro Suzuki; Shinji Naganawa; Naohiro Furuhashi; Masahiro Yamazaki; Hiroshi Ogawa; Hisashi Kawai
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.131

8.  Prevalence and characteristics of clinically significant retained common bile duct stones after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis.

Authors:  Doo-Ho Lee; Young Joon Ahn; Hae Won Lee; Jung Kee Chung; In Mok Jung
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2016-10-31       Impact factor: 1.859

9.  Assessment of the optimal temporal window for intravenous CT cholangiography.

Authors:  Sebastian T Schindera; Rendon C Nelson; Erik K Paulson; David M DeLong; Elmar M Merkle
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-07-03       Impact factor: 7.034

Review 10.  State-of-the-art cross-sectional liver imaging: beyond lesion detection and characterization.

Authors:  Gustavo Felipe Luersen; Priya Bhosale; Janio Szklaruk
Journal:  J Hepatocell Carcinoma       Date:  2015-07-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.