Literature DB >> 10460385

MR cholangiopancreatography: prospective comparison of a breath-hold 2D projection technique with diagnostic ERCP.

D J Lomas1, P W Bearcroft, A E Gimson.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare prospectively a breath-hold projection magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) technique with diagnostic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). Seventy-six patients with suspected strictures or choledocholithiasis were referred for MRCP and subsequent ERCP examination, which were performed within 4 h of each other. The MRCP technique was performed using fat-suppressed rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement (RARE) projection images obtained in standardised planes with additional targeted projections as required by the supervising radiologist. Two radiologists (in consensus) assessed the MRCP results prospectively and independently for the presence of bile duct calculi, strictures, non-specific biliary dilatation and pancreatic duct dilatation, and recorded a single primary diagnosis. The ERCP was assessed prospectively and independently by a single endoscopist and used as a gold standard for comparison with MRCP. Diagnostic agreement was assessed by the Kappa statistic. The MRCP technique failed in two patients and ERCP in five. In the remaining 69 referrals ERCP demonstrated normal findings in 23 cases, strictures in 19 cases, choledocholithiasis in 9 cases, non-specific biliary dilatation in 14 cases and chronic pancreatitis in 4 cases. The MRCP technique correctly demonstrated 22 of 23 normal cases, 19 strictures with one false positive (sensitivity 100 %, specificity 98 %), all 9 cases of choledocholithiasis with two false positives (sensitivity 100 %, specificity 97 %), 12 of 14 cases of non-specific biliary dilatation and only 1 of 4 cases of chronic pancreatitis. There was overall good agreement for diagnosis based on a kappa value of 0.88. Breath-hold projection MRCP can provide non-invasively comparable diagnostic information to diagnostic ERCP for suspected choledocholithiasis and biliary strictures and may allow more selective use of therapeutic ERCP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10460385     DOI: 10.1007/s003300050859

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  10 in total

1.  The value of drip infusion cholangiography using multidetector-row helical CT in patients with choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Masahiro Okada; Jun-Ichi Fukada; Kazuhito Toya; Reiko Ito; Toshio Ohashi; Atsunori Yorozu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-06-21       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Comparison of different MRCP techniques for the depiction of biliary complications after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Sonja Kinner; Alexander Dechêne; Susanne C Ladd; Thomas Zöpf; Evelin Maldonado de Dechêne; Guido Gerken; Thomas C Lauenstein
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-02-16       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography in choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Wen Chen; Jing-Jia Mo; Li Lin; Chao-Qun Li; Jian-Feng Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  Postoperative biliary adverse events following orthotopic liver transplantation: assessment with magnetic resonance cholangiography.

Authors:  Piero Boraschi; Francescamaria Donati
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 5.  Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Vanja Giljaca; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Yemisi Takwoingi; David Higgie; Goran Poropat; Davor Štimac; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-26

6.  Is ERCP really necessary in case of suspected spontaneous passage of bile duct stones?

Authors:  Yuji Sakai; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Takeshi Ishihara; Seigo Yukisawa; Tadashi Ohara; Masaru Tsuboi; Yoshihiko Ooka; Kazuki Kato; Kiyotake Katsuura; Michio Kimura; Makoto Takahashi; Kazuhisa Nemoto; Masaru Miyazaki; Osamu Yokosuka
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Diagnosis and management of acute cholangitis.

Authors:  John G Lee
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 46.802

8.  Appropriate patient selection in the management of common bile duct stones: when not to do ERCP.

Authors:  Palak Jitendrakumar Trivedi; Donald Tse; Ibrahim Al-Bakir; Horace D'Costa
Journal:  ISRN Surg       Date:  2012-06-13

9.  MRCP compared to diagnostic ERCP for diagnosis when biliary obstruction is suspected: a systematic review.

Authors:  Eva C Kaltenthaler; Stephen J Walters; Jim Chilcott; Anthony Blakeborough; Yolanda Bravo Vergel; Steven Thomas
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 1.930

10.  JPN Guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis: diagnostic criteria for acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  Masaru Koizumi; Tadahiro Takada; Yoshifumi Kawarada; Koichi Hirata; Toshihiko Mayumi; Masahiro Yoshida; Miho Sekimoto; Masahiko Hirota; Yasutoshi Kimura; Kazunori Takeda; Shuji Isaji; Makoto Otsuki; Seiki Matsuno
Journal:  J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2006
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.