Literature DB >> 15967525

Micro ionization chamber dosimetry in IMRT verification: clinical implications of dosimetric errors in the PTV.

Francisco Sánchez-Doblado1, Roberto Capote, Joan V Roselló, Antonio Leal, Juan I Lagares, Rafael Arráns, Günther H Hartmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Absolute dose measurements for Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) beamlets is difficult due to the lack of lateral electron equilibrium. Recently we found that the absolute dosimetry in the penumbra region of the IMRT beamlet, can suffer from significant errors (Capote et al., Med Phys 31 (2004) 2416-2422). This work has the goal to estimate the error made when measuring the Planning Target Volume's (PTV) absolute dose by a micro ion chamber (microIC) in typical IMRT treatment. The dose error comes from the assumption that the dosimetric parameters determining the absolute dose are the same as for the reference conditions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two IMRT treatment plans for common prostate carcinoma case, derived by forward and inverse optimisation, were considered. Detailed geometrical simulation of the microIC and the dose verification set-up was performed. The Monte Carlo (MC) simulation allows us to calculate the delivered dose to water and the dose delivered to the active volume of the ion chamber. However, the measured dose in water is usually derived from chamber readings assuming reference conditions. The MC simulation provides needed correction factors for ion chamber dosimetry in non reference conditions.
RESULTS: Dose calculations were carried out for some representative beamlets, a combination of segments and for the delivered IMRT treatments. We observe that the largest dose errors (i.e. the largest correction factors) correspond to the smaller contribution of the corresponding IMRT beamlets to the total dose delivered in the ionization chamber within PTV.
CONCLUSION: The clinical impact of the calculated dose error in PTV measured dose was found to be negligible for studied IMRT treatments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15967525     DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2005.04.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiother Oncol        ISSN: 0167-8140            Impact factor:   6.280


  8 in total

1.  The change of response of ionization chambers in the penumbra and transmission regions: impact for IMRT verification.

Authors:  D González-Castaño; J Pena; F Sánchez-Doblado; G H Hartmann; F Gómez; A Leal
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2007-09-08       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  The effect of influence quantities and detector orientation on small-field patient-specific IMRT QA: comparison of measurements with various ionization chambers.

Authors:  Henry Finlay Godson; Ravikumar Manickam; Sathiyan Saminathan; Kadirampatti Mani Ganesh; Retna Ponmalar
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2016-12-01

3.  Optimized point dose measurement: An effective tool for QA in intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Authors:  Alok Kumar; Gautam Mukherjee; Girigesh Yadav; Vinod Pandey; Kalyan Bhattacharya
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2007-10

4.  Optimized point dose measurement for monitor unit verification in intensity modulated radiation therapy using 6 MV photons by three different methodologies with different detector-phantom combinations: A comparative study.

Authors:  Biplab Sarkar; Bhaswar Ghosh; Sukumaran Mahendramohan; Ayan Basu; Jyotirup Goswami; Amitabh Ray
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2010-07

5.  Statistical analysis of IMRT dosimetry quality assurance measurements for local delivery guideline.

Authors:  Jin Beom Chung; Jae Sung Kim; Sung Whan Ha; Sung-Joon Ye
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 6.  Monte Carlo methods for device simulations in radiation therapy.

Authors:  Hyojun Park; Harald Paganetti; Jan Schuemann; Xun Jia; Chul Hee Min
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 4.174

7.  aSi-EPID transit signal calibration for dynamic beams: a needful step for the IMRT in vivo dosimetry.

Authors:  Francesca Greco; Angelo Piermattei; Luigi Azario; Lorenzo Placidi; Savino Cilla; Rocchina Caivano; Vincenzo Fusco; Andrea Fidanzio
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Characterization of cylindrical ionization chambers for patient specific IMRT QA.

Authors:  Danielle Fraser; William Parker; Jan Seuntjens
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2009-09-30       Impact factor: 2.102

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.