Literature DB >> 15966845

Absolute quantification strategies in proteomics based on mass spectrometry.

Mark Brönstrup1.   

Abstract

The strong need for quantitative information in proteomics has fueled the development of mass spectrometry-based analytical methods that are able to determine protein abundances. This article reviews mass spectrometry experiments aimed at providing an absolute quantification of proteins. The experiments make use of the isotope-dilution concept by spiking a known amount of synthetic, isotope-labeled reference peptide into the analyte sample. Quantification is achieved by comparing the mass spectrometry signal intensities of the reference with an endogenous peptide that is generated upon proteolytic cleavage of the target protein. In an analogous manner, the level of post-translational modification at a distinct residue within a target protein can be determined. Among the strengths of absolute quantification are low detection limits reaching subfemtomole levels, a high dynamic range spanning approximately five orders of magnitude, low requirements for sample clean-up, and a fast and straightforward method development. Recent studies have demonstrated the compatibility of absolute quantification with various mass spectrometry readout techniques and sample purification steps such as 1D gel electrophoresis, size-exclusion chromatography, isoelectric peptide focusing, strong cation exchange and reversed phase or affinity chromatography. Under ideal conditions, quantification errors and coefficients of variation below 5% have been reported. However, the fact that at the start of the experiment the analyte is a protein and the internal standard is a peptide, severe quantification errors may result due to the selection of unsuitable reference peptides and/or imperfect protein proteolysis. Within the ensemble of mass spectrometry-based quantification methods, absolute quantification is the method of choice in cases where absolute numbers, many repetitive experiments or precise levels of post-translational modifications are required for a few, preselected species of interest. Consequently, prominent application areas include biomarker quantification, the study of post-translational modifications such as phosphorylation or ubiquitination and the comparison of concentrations of interacting proteins.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15966845     DOI: 10.1586/14789450.1.4.503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics        ISSN: 1478-9450            Impact factor:   3.940


  22 in total

Review 1.  Transfusion medicine and proteomics. Alliance or coexistence?

Authors:  Thomas Thiele; Leif Steil; Uwe Völker; Andreas Greinacher
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  Quantitative proteome analysis using D-labeled N-ethylmaleimide and 13C-labeled iodoacetanilide by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Sadamu Kurono; Tamie Kurono; Naoka Komori; Satomi Niwayama; Hiroyuki Matsumoto
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2006-10-16       Impact factor: 3.641

3.  A method to determine the ionization efficiency change of peptides caused by phosphorylation.

Authors:  Yuan Gao; Yinsheng Wang
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 3.109

Review 4.  Biomarker method validation in anticancer drug development.

Authors:  J Cummings; T H Ward; A Greystoke; M Ranson; C Dive
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2007-09-17       Impact factor: 8.739

5.  Optimizing the conditions of a multiple reaction monitoring assay for membrane proteins: quantification of cytochrome P450 11A1 and adrenodoxin reductase in bovine adrenal cortex and retina.

Authors:  Wei-Li Liao; Gun-Young Heo; Nathan G Dodder; Irina A Pikuleva; Illarion V Turko
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Targeted Proteomics for Multiplexed Verification of Markers of Colorectal Tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Anuli Christiana Uzozie; Nathalie Selevsek; Asa Wahlander; Paolo Nanni; Jonas Grossmann; Achim Weber; Federico Buffoli; Giancarlo Marra
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 7.  Quantitative targeted proteomics for membrane transporter proteins: method and application.

Authors:  Xi Qiu; Hui Zhang; Yurong Lai
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 4.009

8.  Comparative analyses of differentially induced T-cell receptor-mediated phosphorylation pathways in T lymphoma cells.

Authors:  Serina Ortiz; Wenhui Lee; David Smith; Stephen J Forman; Terry D Lee; Chih-Pin Liu
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2010-12

9.  Shotgun proteomics in neuroscience.

Authors:  Lujian Liao; Daniel B McClatchy; John R Yates
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 17.173

10.  Rapid assessment of RNAi-mediated protein depletion by selected reaction monitoring mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Veronika A Glukhova; Daniela M Tomazela; Geoffrey D Findlay; Raymond J Monnat; Michael J MacCoss
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 4.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.