Literature DB >> 15957625

Initial transcutaneous PCO2 overshoot with ear probe at 42 degrees C.

Sohei Kagawa1, Norimasa Otani, Masayuki Kamide, Pierre-Alain Gisiger, Patrick Eberhard, John W Severinghaus.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate an unexpectedly high initial skin CO2 pressure with a new small earlobe probe* heated to 42 degrees C containing both transcutaneous (tcPCO2) and pulse oximeter saturation (SpO2) sensors.
METHODS: The probe was mounted on the ear lobe of six patients during abdominal or thoracic surgery and on several awake volunteers. The probe was mounted on a cheek or forearm in two other volunteers. Patients were artificially ventilated under general anesthesia at constant end-expiratory PCO2.
RESULTS: In patients, at 8 +/- 3 min after mounting, tcPCO2 peaked 5 mmHg higher than its final value (p = 0.0067, n = 6, paired t-test). After 25 min, tcPCO2 was not different from PaCO2 (arterial). Similar overshoots were recorded with this device when mounted on the arm or cheek and with a standard transcutaneous PCO2 probe set to 42 degrees C, mounted on the ear lobe, arm or chest of awake volunteers. In two volunteers, we found that heating the sensor to 45 degrees C for the first 15 min on the ear, and then decreasing it to 42 degrees C prevented overshoot, and provided valid tcPCO2 data 3 - 5 min after application of the sensor.
CONCLUSIONS: A temperature of 42 degrees C may increase local skin temperature and metabolism before vasodilating more remote arteriolar control of sub-sensor capillary flow. We suggest that transcutaneous PCO2 probes be initially set to 44 - 45 degrees C for 5 - 15 min to induce prompt vasodilation to prevent this overshoot and then reduced to 42 degrees C to avoid skin thermal injury in case of long-term application.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15957625     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-005-5492-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  2 in total

1.  Methods of measurement of blood and gas carbon dioxide during anesthesia.

Authors:  J W SEVERINGHAUS
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1960 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 7.892

2.  Combining transcutaneous blood gas measurement and pulse oximetry.

Authors:  Patrick Eberhard; P A Gisiger; J P Gardaz; D R Spahn
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.108

  2 in total
  7 in total

1.  Clinical validation of a digital transcutaneous PCO2/SpO2 ear sensor in adult patients after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Werner Baulig; Philipp Schütt; Hans R Roth; Josef Hayoz; Edith R Schmid
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2007-08-16       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Transcutaneous PCO2 monitors are more accurate than end-tidal PCO2 monitors.

Authors:  Makihiko Hirabayashi; Chieko Fujiwara; Norimasa Ohtani; Sohei Kagawa; Masayuki Kamide
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Accuracy of a transcutaneous carbon dioxide pressure monitoring device in emergency room patients with acute respiratory failure.

Authors:  P-E Gancel; E Roupie; L Guittet; S Laplume; N Terzi
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Recent advance in patient monitoring.

Authors:  Tomoki Nishiyama
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2010-09-20

5.  Incidence and severity of respiratory insufficiency detected by transcutaneous carbon dioxide monitoring after cardiac surgery and intensive care unit discharge.

Authors:  Elaine E Lagow; Barbara Bobbi Leeper; Linda W Jennings; Michael A E Ramsay
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2013-10

Review 6.  State-of-the-art sensor technology in Spain: invasive and non-invasive techniques for monitoring respiratory variables.

Authors:  Christian Domingo; Lluis Blanch; Gaston Murias; Manel Luján
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2010-05-05       Impact factor: 3.576

7.  Optimal clinical time for reliable measurement of transcutaneous CO2 with ear probes: counterbalancing overshoot and the vasodilatation effect.

Authors:  Christian Domingo; Elisa Canturri; Amalia Moreno; Humildad Espuelas; Laura Vigil; Manel Luján
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 3.576

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.