Literature DB >> 15956525

Three-dimensional dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography using sensitivity encoding for the evaluation of intracranial arteriovenous malformations: a preliminary study.

Jean-Yves Gauvrit1, Xavier Leclerc, Catherine Oppenheim, Thierry Munier, Denis Trystram, Henda Rachdi, François Nataf, Jean-Pierre Pruvo, Jean-François Meder.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Our aim was to develop 3D dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography with high temporal resolution without sacrificing spatial resolution by using sensitivity encoding for the evaluation of cerebral arteriovenous malformations.
METHODS: Nineteen patients with 19 angiographically proven arteriovenous malformations (16 supratentorial and 3 infratentorial) were assessed by conventional catheter angiography and 3D dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography. A 3D contrast-enhanced gradient-echo sequence with sensitivity encoding based on a parallel imaging technique was performed and acquired 20 dynamic images, repeated 18 times every 1.7 seconds. Three-dimensional dynamic MR digital subtraction angiograms were analyzed independently by two radiologists in a blinded fashion with regard to arteriovenous malformation nidus and venous drainage. Conventional catheter angiography was used as reference.
RESULTS: All MR imaging examinations were assessable. Interobserver agreement was excellent for the detection of nidus and for the evaluation of nidus size (kappa = 1 and 0.875, respectively) but moderate for the visualization of the venous drainage (kappa = 0.56). All nidi detected on conventional catheter angiography were clearly depicted on 3D dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography. The evaluation of the size of the nidus by both techniques was similar. On 3D dynamic MR angiograms, veins were correctly analyzed in 17 of 19 arteriovenous malformations.
CONCLUSION: Our preliminary study demonstrates that 3D dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography using sensitivity encoding with a high spatial resolution is appropriate for the assessment of arteriovenous malformations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15956525      PMCID: PMC8149077     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  38 in total

1.  On improving temporal and spatial resolution of 3D contrast-enhanced body MR angiography with parallel imaging.

Authors:  Qun Chen; Carla V Quijano; Vu M Mai; Saravanan K Krishnamoorthy; Wei Li; Pippa Storey; Robert R Edelman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Comparison of intracranial 3D-ToF-MRA with and without parallel acquisition techniques at 1.5T and 3.0T: preliminary results.

Authors:  J Gaa; S Weidauer; M Requardt; B Kiefer; H Lanfermann; F E Zanella
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.990

3.  Magnetic resonance angiography of vascular malformations

Authors: 
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.266

4.  Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays.

Authors:  D K Sodickson; W J Manning
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.668

5.  Dural arteriovenous fistulae: noninvasive diagnosis with dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Stuart C Coley; Charles A J Romanowski; Timothy J Hodgson; Paul D Griffiths
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Time-resolved projection MRA: clinical application in intracranial vascular malformations.

Authors:  J Klisch; R Strecker; J Hennig; M Schumacher
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.804

7.  Preliminary experience with dynamic MR projection angiography in the evaluation of cervicocranial steno-occlusive disease.

Authors:  S G Wetzel; R Haselhorst; D Bilecen; P A Lyrer; E Seifritz; G Bongartz; E W Radue; K Scheffler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: comparison of novel magnetic resonance angiographic techniques and conventional catheter angiography.

Authors:  D J Warren; N Hoggard; L Walton; M W Radatz; A A Kemeny; D M Forster; I D Wilkinson; P D Griffiths
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: evaluation with combined 3D time-of-flight MR angiography and MR digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Kyo Noguchi; Elias R Melhem; Tadayoshi Kanazawa; Michiya Kubo; Naoya Kuwayama; Hikaru Seto
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.959

Review 10.  [Imaging of non-traumatic intracerebral hematoma].

Authors:  X Leclerc; C Khalil; S Silvera; J Y Gauvrit; S Bracard; J F Meder; J P Pruvo
Journal:  J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.447

View more
  17 in total

1.  Detection of residual brain arteriovenous malformations after radiosurgery: diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced four-dimensional MR angiography at 3.0 T.

Authors:  H K Lim; C G Choi; S M Kim; J L Kim; D H Lee; S J Kim; D C Suh
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-01-31       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Brain arteriovenous malformation diagnosis: value of time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3.0T compared to DSA.

Authors:  A Machet; C Portefaix; K Kadziolka; G Robin; O Lanoix; L Pierot
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Quality-evaluation scheme for cerebral time-resolved 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography techniques.

Authors:  H Raoult; J-C Ferré; X Morandi; B Carsin-Nicol; M Carsin; M Cuggia; M Law; J-Y Gauvrit
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Three-dimensional dynamic magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of radiosurgically treated cerebral arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  Jean-Yves Gauvrit; Catherine Oppenheim; Francois Nataf; Olivier Naggara; Denis Trystram; Thierry Munier; Daniel Fredy; Jean-Pierre Pruvo; François-Xavier Roux; Xavier Leclerc; Jean-François Meder
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Dynamic 3D-CT angiography.

Authors:  M Matsumoto; N Kodama; Y Endo; J Sakuma; Ky Suzuki; T Sasaki; K Murakami; Ke Suzuki; T Katakura; F Shishido
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  3D time-resolved contrast-enhanced cerebrovascular MR angiography with subsecond frame update times using radial k-space trajectories and highly constrained projection reconstruction.

Authors:  Y Wu; N Kim; F R Korosec; A Turk; H A Rowley; O Wieben; C A Mistretta; P A Turski
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Recent advances in 3D time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography.

Authors:  Stephen J Riederer; Clifton R Haider; Eric A Borisch; Paul T Weavers; Phillip M Young
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Noncontrast enhanced four-dimensional dynamic MRA with golden angle radial acquisition and K-space weighted image contrast (KWIC) reconstruction.

Authors:  Hee Kwon Song; Lirong Yan; Robert X Smith; Yiqun Xue; Stanislas Rapacchi; Subashini Srinivasan; Daniel B Ennis; Peng Hu; Nader Pouratian; Danny J J Wang
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  Dural arteriovenous fistula involving the transverse sigmoid sinus after treatment: assessment with magnetic resonance digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Kyo Noguchi; Naoya Kuwayama; Michiya Kubo; Yuichi Kamisaki; Gakuto Tomizawa; Keisuke Kameda; Hideto Kawabe; Shinichi Ogawa; Hiroshi Kato; Masashi Shimizu; Naoto Watanabe; Hikaru Seto
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2007-03-20       Impact factor: 2.804

10.  Time-of-Arrival Parametric Maps and Virtual Bolus Images Derived From Contrast-Enhanced Time-Resolved Radial Magnetic Resonance Angiography Improve the Display of Brain Arteriovenous Malformation Vascular Anatomy.

Authors:  Tilman Schubert; Yijing Wu; Kevin M Johnson; Oliver Wieben; Jane Maksimovic; Charles Mistretta; Patrick Turski
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 6.016

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.