Literature DB >> 15956152

Report of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group on outcomes research in cardiovascular disease.

Harlan M Krumholz1, Eric D Peterson, John Z Ayanian, Marshall H Chin, Robert F DeBusk, Lee Goldman, Catarina I Kiefe, Neil R Powe, John S Rumsfeld, John A Spertus, William S Weintraub.   

Abstract

The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute convened a working group on outcomes research in cardiovascular disease (CVD). The working group sought to provide guidance on research priorities in outcomes research related to CVD. For the purposes of this document, "outcomes research" is defined as investigative endeavors that generate knowledge to improve clinical decision making and healthcare delivery to optimize patient outcomes. The working group identified the following priority areas: (1) national surveillance projects for high-prevalence CV conditions; (2) patient-centered care; (3) translation of the best science into clinical practice; and (4) studies that place the cost of interventions in the context of their real-world effectiveness. Within each of these topics, the working group described examples of initiatives that could serve the Institute and the public. In addition, the group identified the following areas that are important to the field: (1) promotion of the use of existing data; (2) facilitation of collaborations with other federal agencies; (3) investigations into the basic science of outcomes research, with an emphasis on methodological advances; (4) strengthening of appropriate study sections with individuals who have expertise in outcomes research; and (5) expansion of opportunities to train new outcomes research investigators. The working group concluded that a dedicated investment in CV outcomes research could directly improve the care delivered in the United States.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15956152     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.536102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  36 in total

1.  A Positive Psychology Intervention for Patients with an Acute Coronary Syndrome: Treatment Development and Proof-of-Concept Trial.

Authors:  Jeff C Huffman; Rachel A Millstein; Carol A Mastromauro; Shannon V Moore; Christopher M Celano; C Andres Bedoya; Laura Suarez; Julia K Boehm; James L Januzzi
Journal:  J Happiness Stud       Date:  2015-10-19

2.  Things are Looking up Since We Started Listening to Patients: Trends in the Application of Conjoint Analysis in Health 1982-2007.

Authors:  John F P Bridges; Elizabeth T Kinter; Lillian Kidane; Rebekah R Heinzen; Colleen McCormick
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  The Italian MacNew heart disease health-related quality of life questionnaire: a validation study.

Authors:  Francesco Fattirolli; Niccolò Marchionni; Stefan Höfer; Pantaleo Giannuzzi; Elisabetta Angelino; Paolo Fioretti; Daniela Miani; Neil Oldridge
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2015-02-10       Impact factor: 3.397

4.  Multiple procedures and cumulative individual radiation exposure in interventional cardiology: A long-term retrospective study.

Authors:  Birgitta M Weltermann; Thomas Rock; Gunnar Brix; Alexander Schegerer; Peter Berndt; Anja Viehmann; Sabrina Reinders; Stefan Gesenhues
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Decreased physical effort, fatigue, and mental distress in patients with coronary artery disease: importance of personality-related differences.

Authors:  Adomas Bunevicius; Julija Brozaitiene; Margarita Staniute; Vaidute Gelziniene; Inga Duoneliene; Victor J M Pop; Robertas Bunevicius; Johan Denollet
Journal:  Int J Behav Med       Date:  2014-04

6.  Predictors of Rehospitalization Among Adults With Congenital Heart Disease Are Lesion Specific.

Authors:  Ari M Cedars; Sara Burns; Eric L Novak; Amit P Amin
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2016-09-13

7.  Centers for cardiovascular outcomes research: defining a collaborative vision.

Authors:  Nakela L Cook; Denise E Bonds; Catarina I Kiefe; Jeptha P Curtis; Harlan M Krumholz; Nancy R Kressin; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2013-03-12

8.  Beyond Type D personality: reduced positive affect (anhedonia) predicts impaired health status in chronic heart failure.

Authors:  Aline J Pelle; Susanne S Pedersen; Balázs M Szabó; Johan Denollet
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-05-09       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Negative and positive affect are independently associated with patient-reported health status following percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Henneke Versteeg; Susanne S Pedersen; Ruud A M Erdman; Josephine W I van Nierop; Peter de Jaegere; Ron T van Domburg
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-07-19       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Type D personality is a predictor of poor emotional quality of life in primary care heart failure patients independent of depressive symptoms and New York Heart Association functional class.

Authors:  Susanne S Pedersen; Christoph Herrmann-Lingen; Peter de Jonge; Martin Scherer
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2010-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.