BACKGROUND: Identification of cardio-toxic psychological symptoms in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients is important. PURPOSE: We examined the association of negative affectivity (NA), social inhibition (SI), and their combination in the distressed (Type D) personality with functional status, fatigue, and mental distress in CAD patients. METHOD: Following acute coronary syndrome, 690 consecutive CAD patients agreed to participate in this cross-sectional study and were evaluated for clinical characteristics, including left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and for NA, SI, and Type D personality (i.e., NA and SI; DS14 scale) when they entered a cardiac rehabilitation program in Lithuania. Patient-centered outcomes included functional status (bicycle ergometer), symptoms of fatigue (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20), and mental distress (Beck Depression Inventory-II and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). RESULTS: The reference subgroup (neither NA nor SI) included 34 % of patients; 13 % had NA only, 19 % had SI only, and 34 % had Type D profile. Type D patients had worse functional status, and Type D patients and NA-only patients had higher symptom levels of fatigue and mental distress. In multivariate regression models that included LVEF, clinical characteristics, and depressive symptoms, Type D personality was an independent predictor of decreased exercise capacity (OR = 1.77, 95 % CI 1.06-2.95, p = .03) and decreased motivation for activity (OR = 3.14, 95 % CI 1.73-5.73, p < .001). Type D, NA, and SI were also independent predictors of mental distress. CONCLUSIONS: Type D personality traits independently predicted poor functional status and worse patient-centered outcomes independently from LVEF and depression. Further studies exploring personality-related differences in cardiovascular outcomes are needed.
BACKGROUND: Identification of cardio-toxic psychological symptoms in coronary artery disease (CAD) patients is important. PURPOSE: We examined the association of negative affectivity (NA), social inhibition (SI), and their combination in the distressed (Type D) personality with functional status, fatigue, and mental distress in CAD patients. METHOD: Following acute coronary syndrome, 690 consecutive CAD patients agreed to participate in this cross-sectional study and were evaluated for clinical characteristics, including left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and for NA, SI, and Type D personality (i.e., NA and SI; DS14 scale) when they entered a cardiac rehabilitation program in Lithuania. Patient-centered outcomes included functional status (bicycle ergometer), symptoms of fatigue (Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory-20), and mental distress (Beck Depression Inventory-II and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). RESULTS: The reference subgroup (neither NA nor SI) included 34 % of patients; 13 % had NA only, 19 % had SI only, and 34 % had Type D profile. Type D patients had worse functional status, and Type D patients and NA-only patients had higher symptom levels of fatigue and mental distress. In multivariate regression models that included LVEF, clinical characteristics, and depressive symptoms, Type D personality was an independent predictor of decreased exercise capacity (OR = 1.77, 95 % CI 1.06-2.95, p = .03) and decreased motivation for activity (OR = 3.14, 95 % CI 1.73-5.73, p < .001). Type D, NA, and SI were also independent predictors of mental distress. CONCLUSIONS: Type D personality traits independently predicted poor functional status and worse patient-centered outcomes independently from LVEF and depression. Further studies exploring personality-related differences in cardiovascular outcomes are needed.
Authors: Adomas Bunevicius; Albinas Stankus; Julija Brozaitiene; Susan S Girdler; Robertas Bunevicius Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2011-07-18 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Adomas Bunevicius; Vilte Gintauskiene; Aurelija Podlipskyte; Remigijus Zaliunas; Julija Brozaitiene; Arthur J Prange; Robertas Bunevicius Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2012-09-28 Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Maja Stulemeijer; Teuntje M J C Andriessen; Jolanda M P Brauer; Pieter E Vos; Sieberen Van Der Werf Journal: Brain Inj Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 2.311
Authors: Kim L Lavoie; Richard P Fleet; Francois Lespérance; André Arsenault; Catherine Laurin; Nancy Frasure-Smith; Simon L Bacon Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Nijole Kazukauskiene; Julius Burkauskas; Jurate Macijauskiene; Inga Duoneliene; Vaidute Gelziniene; Vilija Jakumaite; Julija Brozaitiene Journal: Int J Behav Med Date: 2018-02
Authors: Adomas Bunevicius; Margarita Staniute; Julija Brozaitiene; Victor J M Pop; Julius Neverauskas; Robertas Bunevicius Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2013-03-11 Impact factor: 3.186