Literature DB >> 15953422

Spatiotemporal elements of macaque v1 receptive fields.

Nicole C Rust1, Odelia Schwartz, J Anthony Movshon, Eero P Simoncelli.   

Abstract

Neurons in primary visual cortex (V1) are commonly classified as simple or complex based upon their sensitivity to the sign of stimulus contrast. The responses of both cell types can be described by a general model in which the outputs of a set of linear filters are nonlinearly combined. We estimated the model for a population of V1 neurons by analyzing the mean and covariance of the spatiotemporal distribution of random bar stimuli that were associated with spikes. This analysis reveals an unsuspected richness of neuronal computation within V1. Specifically, simple and complex cell responses are best described using more linear filters than the one or two found in standard models. Many filters revealed by the model contribute suppressive signals that appear to have a predominantly divisive influence on neuronal firing. Suppressive signals are especially potent in direction-selective cells, where they reduce responses to stimuli moving in the nonpreferred direction.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15953422     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2005.05.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuron        ISSN: 0896-6273            Impact factor:   17.173


  187 in total

1.  Suppressive mechanisms in monkey V1 help to solve the stereo correspondence problem.

Authors:  Seiji Tanabe; Ralf M Haefner; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Local sensitivity to stimulus orientation and spatial frequency within the receptive fields of neurons in visual area 2 of macaque monkeys.

Authors:  X Tao; B Zhang; E L Smith; S Nishimoto; I Ohzawa; Y M Chino
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-11-23       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The accuracy of membrane potential reconstruction based on spiking receptive fields.

Authors:  Deepankar Mohanty; Benjamin Scholl; Nicholas J Priebe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Receptive field dimensionality increases from the auditory midbrain to cortex.

Authors:  Craig A Atencio; Tatyana O Sharpee; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Characterizing responses of translation-invariant neurons to natural stimuli: maximally informative invariant dimensions.

Authors:  Michael Eickenberg; Ryan J Rowekamp; Minjoon Kouh; Tatyana O Sharpee
Journal:  Neural Comput       Date:  2012-06-26       Impact factor: 2.026

6.  Complex cell receptive fields: evidence for a hierarchical mechanism.

Authors:  Joshua P van Kleef; Shaun L Cloherty; Michael R Ibbotson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-07-26       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Bayesian inference for generalized linear models for spiking neurons.

Authors:  Sebastian Gerwinn; Jakob H Macke; Matthias Bethge
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 2.380

8.  Dynamics of visual receptive fields in the macaque frontal eye field.

Authors:  J Patrick Mayo; Amie R DiTomasso; Marc A Sommer; Matthew A Smith
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Deep Learning Models of the Retinal Response to Natural Scenes.

Authors:  Lane T McIntosh; Niru Maheswaranathan; Aran Nayebi; Surya Ganguli; Stephen A Baccus
Journal:  Adv Neural Inf Process Syst       Date:  2016

10.  Identifying Dendritic Processing.

Authors:  Aurel A Lazar; Yevgeniy B Slutskiy
Journal:  Adv Neural Inf Process Syst       Date:  2010
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.