Literature DB >> 20660567

Complex cell receptive fields: evidence for a hierarchical mechanism.

Joshua P van Kleef1, Shaun L Cloherty, Michael R Ibbotson.   

Abstract

Simple cells in the primary visual cortex have segregated ON and OFF subregions in their receptive fields, while complex cells have overlapping ON and OFF subregions. These two cell types form the extremes at each end of a continuum of receptive field types. Hubel and Wiesel in 1962 suggested a hierarchical scheme of processing whereby spatially offset simple cells drive complex cells. Simple and complex cells are often classified by their responses to moving sine wave gratings: simple cells have oscillatory responses while complex cells produce unmodulated responses. Here, using moving gratings as stimuli, we show that a significant number of cells that display low levels of response modulation at high contrasts demonstrate high levels of response modulation at low contrasts. Most often a drifting low contrast grating generates a large phasic response at the fundamental frequency of the grating (F(1)) and a smaller but significant phasic response that is approximately 180 deg out-of-phase with the F(1) component. We present several models capable of capturing the effects of stimulus contrast on complex cell responses. The model that best reproduces our experimental results is a variation of the classical hierarchical model. In our model several spatially offset simple cells provide input to a complex cell, with each simple cell exhibiting a different contrast response function. At low contrasts only one of these simple cells is sufficiently excited to reveal its receptive field properties. As contrast is increased additional spatially offset simple cells with higher contrast thresholds add their responses to the overall spiking activity.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20660567      PMCID: PMC2988511          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.191452

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  41 in total

1.  Construction of complex receptive fields in cat primary visual cortex.

Authors:  L M Martinez; J M Alonso
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-11-08       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Rethinking the taxonomy of visual neurons.

Authors:  L F Abbott; F S Chance
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Spatiotemporal tuning of directional neurons in mammalian and avian pretectum: a comparison of physiological properties.

Authors:  M R Ibbotson; N S Price
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  An egalitarian network model for the emergence of simple and complex cells in visual cortex.

Authors:  Louis Tao; Michael Shelley; David McLaughlin; Robert Shapley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Contrast-dependent spatial summation in the lateral geniculate nucleus and retina of the cat.

Authors:  M J Nolt; R D Kumbhani; L A Palmer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-05-05       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The contribution of spike threshold to the dichotomy of cortical simple and complex cells.

Authors:  Nicholas J Priebe; Ferenc Mechler; Matteo Carandini; David Ferster
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-08-29       Impact factor: 24.884

7.  Laminar differences in receptive field properties of cells in cat primary visual cortex.

Authors:  C D Gilbert
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Nonlinear analysis of cat retinal ganglion cells in the frequency domain.

Authors:  J D Victor; R M Shapley; B W Knight
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Projection of X- and Y-cells of the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus to areas 17 and 18 of visual cortex.

Authors:  J Stone; B Dreher
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1973-05       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Spatial and temporal contrast sensitivity of neurones in areas 17 and 18 of the cat's visual cortex.

Authors:  J A Movshon; I D Thompson; D J Tolhurst
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  9 in total

1.  Spatial phase sensitivity of complex cells in primary visual cortex depends on stimulus contrast.

Authors:  H Meffin; M A Hietanen; S L Cloherty; M R Ibbotson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Stability of simple/complex classification with contrast and extraclassical receptive field modulation in macaque V1.

Authors:  Christopher A Henry; Michael J Hawken
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-01-09       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  The divisive normalization model of V1 neurons: a comprehensive comparison of physiological data and model predictions.

Authors:  Tadamasa Sawada; Alexander A Petrov
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Synaptic Basis for Contrast-Dependent Shifts in Functional Identity in Mouse V1.

Authors:  Molis Yunzab; Veronica Choi; Hamish Meffin; Shaun L Cloherty; Nicholas J Priebe; Michael R Ibbotson
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2019-04-09

5.  Comparison of contrast-dependent phase sensitivity in primary visual cortex of mouse, cat and macaque.

Authors:  Molis Yunzab; Shaun L Cloherty; Michael R Ibbotson
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  Learning receptive field properties of complex cells in V1.

Authors:  Yanbo Lian; Ali Almasi; David B Grayden; Tatiana Kameneva; Anthony N Burkitt; Hamish Meffin
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2021-03-02       Impact factor: 4.475

7.  Spectral characteristics of phase sensitivity and discharge rate of neurons in the ascending tectofugal visual system.

Authors:  Marek Wypych; Attila Nagy; Gabriela Mochol; Andrzej Foik; György Benedek; Wioletta J Waleszczyk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Sensory experience modifies feature map relationships in visual cortex.

Authors:  Shaun L Cloherty; Nicholas J Hughes; Markus A Hietanen; Partha S Bhagavatula; Geoffrey J Goodhill; Michael R Ibbotson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-06-16       Impact factor: 8.140

9.  Effects of top-down influence suppression on behavioral and V1 neuronal contrast sensitivity functions in cats.

Authors:  Jian Ding; Zheng Ye; Fei Xu; Xiangmei Hu; Hao Yu; Shen Zhang; Yanni Tu; Qiuyu Zhang; Qingyan Sun; Tianmiao Hua; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  iScience       Date:  2021-12-24
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.